On the “Rove is going to be indicted” stories…
John Podhertz: “all the “getting in front of the news cycle” that happened in the 1990s when I was told time and again that Hillary Clinton was about to be indicted. The difference: that stuff was done in conversation. The Jason Leopold stuff about Karl Rove was published electronically.”
12.06.00 Newsmax: “Ray Moving on Clinton Indictment”
12.16.01 Newsmax: “Starr Deputy: ‘Clinton’s Indictment is Going to Happen’”
I’m wondering who snarked falseout into getting up the hopes of millions of far-out whacko leftists.
I had so many letters in my e-mail from whackos practically having electronic orgasms last Sunday that it is beyond funny.
And half the Drudge archives, too.
None of the evidence you present disproves what Podhertz wrote.
Ferris, can you read English? Pod-whore-etz said that the Clinton stuff was done in conversation, where the Leopold rumors were published in cyberspace.
Oliver was simply pointing out that wingnut blog whores didn’t hesitate to print rumors concerning Clinton’s indictment.
Are you being stupid on purpose, or just naturally stupid?