Comments on: Seriously Stupid

By: frameone

frameone — Fri, 12 May 2006 04:05:24 +0000

Since you felt the need to link to your own comment, I'll join you Idiot.

By: JWG

JWG — Fri, 12 May 2006 03:05:44 +0000

U.S. Supreme Court: SMITH v. MARYLAND No warrant needed.

By: frameone

frameone — Fri, 12 May 2006 03:05:25 +0000

“Is this another one of those leakers/whisteblowers that is good when it is something that the Dems can spin and contort into something it is not ?”

Okay, JD, what is it? Tell us all what you think it is.

By: JD

JD — Fri, 12 May 2006 03:05:15 +0000

Yes, Roni .. this is happening all over our great land.

Who owns your telephone records ?

Is this another one of those leakers/whisteblowers that is good when it is something that the Dems can spin and contort into something it is not ?

By: Leroy Brown

Leroy Brown — Fri, 12 May 2006 01:05:47 +0000

Hey Frank, you got some back-up on that? Or is this just “when the president does it, it’s not a crime” crap?

By: Roni

Roni — Fri, 12 May 2006 01:05:42 +0000

Frank_D Says:
May 11th, 2006 at 7:17 pm
It turns out that keeping track of calls made from one number to another, without actually monitoring the content, does not require a warrant. Once again, we have a scandal – less scandal. Just add left wing panic, and stir.

What are you going to do when Dubya says that breaking into your apartment at Odell Place, ripping you out of your bed in front of your sons, arresting you without cause and throwing you in jail requires no reason … that the government merely suspects you might be associated with Al Qaeda?

Where do you draw the line, Frank?

By: Leroy Brown

Leroy Brown — Fri, 12 May 2006 01:05:35 +0000

What’s really scary is if you read the postings on that article. The one’s talking about how we need to kill those “traitors” in the media for DARING to report this. And then they say it wasn’t a big story anyway.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Fri, 12 May 2006 01:05:19 +0000

The President said its okay, so it is.

We’ll have fun with that, whether it’s Hillary, Al, Wes, Evan, Mark, or whoever in the near future…

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 12 May 2006 00:05:25 +0000

It turns out that keeping track of calls made from one number to another, without actually monitoring the content, does not require a warrant. Once again, we have a scandal – less scandal. Just add left wing panic, and stir.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Thu, 11 May 2006 23:05:27 +0000

The IRS job is to collect that information in order to collect the tax revenue that keeps our country running. The NSA s job is to collect intelligence within the law to protect Americans.
And, of course, if you’re a Democratic, collecting taxes is job #1.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Thu, 11 May 2006 23:05:23 +0000

Hey, Frank, you win idiot non sequitir of the day.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 11 May 2006 22:05:22 +0000

The lengths these people go to justify this are unbelievable. The fact is that government agencies that have unrelated missions are banned from sharing that info from each other, precisely for privacy concerns.

I wish that all of these cons would just get a RFID chip imbedded in them- that way their Leader could monitor every move they make, and that way the rest of us could keep our constitutional freedoms.