Comments on: Questions Swirl

By: jonrog1

jonrog1 — Thu, 04 May 2006 07:05:27 +0000

Just breathing a sigh of relief

Ahh, thank God those years of economic prosperity, government surpluses, international respect and a fully functioning FEMA are over with. Siiiiiiiiigh.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:04:28 +0000

I don’t know exactly what “worth” the link was supposed to have, for you, anyway. The Special Prosecutor crap is coming to an end, and with it, all the sad baggage, for both parties, that it brought with it.

You would have been at the front of the line crowing about what a liliy-livered, yella-bellied cowardly lib he was.
Nah, just breathing a sigh of relief.

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:04:53 +0000

I’m glad he had balls enough to stand up to those bullies who tried to take him down over something that really was none of their business.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:04:40 +0000

Good for you, Curmudgeon. Be sure and read the tombstone carefully, before you start dancing. It might say, Liberalism, R.I.P.

Duros: I wasn’t gleeful, I was disgusted. If he had had any balls, he would have resigned. He was too vain for that.

Did you steal that gag from late-eighties Paula Poundstone? Or was it Joe Piscopo-era SNL?

Neither.

By: qkslvr_wolf

qkslvr_wolf — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:04:11 +0000

So, then, you’ll be calling for the resignation of Bush and company if they’re proven guilty?

No, didn’t think so.

BTW, your link is kind of worthless, because Ken Starr was hired to investigate “whitewater” (on which he found nothing). The article says he was hired to investigate the lewinsky bit. He just decided to investigate the lewinsky thing because…well, I’m not sure. Probably because he isn’t smart enough to whack off and it gave him a big neocon chubby.

Oh, one more thing. Clinton was acquitted. So why are you still talking about it? After all, if you’ve enough faith in the system to not want to talk about someone who has not yet been found guilty, why are you still complaining so bitterly about someone who WAS EXPLICITLY FOUND NOT GUILTY?

Just curious.

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:04:09 +0000

Are you trying to tell me that if he had resigned you would have admired it? Puhleeze.
You would have been at the front of the line crowing about what a liliy-livered, yella-bellied cowardly lib he was.

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:04:03 +0000

He just decided to investigate the lewinsky thing because& well, I m not sure.
‘cuz that’s all they could find. And they had to use a wire to get that!

By: mr.curmudgeon

mr.curmudgeon — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:04:43 +0000

In what way will his indictment do anything for you, and anyone you know?

An idictment moves him closer to accountability, and will most likely impede his ruinous rampage through the American political landscape that is current administration policy.

This is a TREMENDOUSLY good thing. Not to mention the negative effect it will have on public perception of the Republican party.

Which is another good thing. They have failed this country and should suffer the consequences come ’06 and ’08. They need to be stopped, and if guilty of criminal activity, punished.

I don t remember any glee, because I didn t feel any.

Well, good for you! Me? Come indictment time, and (hopefully) conviction time, I’m going to dance on the GOP’s grave. *tap* *tappity* *tap*

By: TomY

TomY — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:04:28 +0000

Anyway, regardless of the origin of the ham sandwich cliche, the only place I see it is in conservative blogosphere, who endlessly ape and chew over the florid, hackneyed, faux-British style of Tyrell and the other dittoplagiarists.

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:59 +0000

Frank, try to remember the glee you felt when Clinton was impeached and then you might understand.

By: TomY

TomY — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:27 +0000

“You ll get our Home Game of What the Hell do I Know? I m just a Liberal!

Thanks, Frank, for proving my point about Conservatives, your cliched language, and your cliched minds. Did you steal that gag from late-eighties Paula Poundstone? Or was it Joe Piscopo-era SNL? Either way, megadittos!

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:24 +0000

Tom may have been referring to this.

By: duros62

duros62 — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:21 +0000

I don t remember any glee, because I didn t feel any.
Yeah, ok.

And I don t remember Pollack being a conservative.
It was not a conservative/liberal observation. It was the absurdity of the process. At least IMO. But I see your point. Not a conservative cliche. Just not a liberal one either.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:16 +0000

And I don’t remember Pollack being a conservative.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:04:10 +0000

I don't remember any glee, because I didn't feel any. But thanks for the revelation of the Democratic's motives behind this. Incidentally, time is running out for you guys

By: Hattie

Hattie — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:04:56 +0000

We wait and hope.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:04:42 +0000

Tommy: That’s not a conservative cliche
Better luck next time.
But you’re not going empty – handed! You’ll get our Home Game of “What the Hell do I Know? I’m just a Liberal!”

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:04:38 +0000

13. He hasn’t been indicted!

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:04:32 +0000

Seriously, Hattie, what are “hoping” for? In what way will his indictment do anything for you, and anyone you know?
Silly.
Not just you.
All you lefties.
Indict him, Indict her, don’t let him / her on the Supreme Court — fail George, fail!

By: TomY

TomY — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:04:07 +0000

I forgot about that ham sandwich line. Truly an immortal in the pantheon of endlessly recycled idiotic conservative cliches, along with “fever swamp,” “moonbat,” and “guilty, your honor.”