<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snow The Pacifier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32174</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32174</guid>
		<description>Unlike Scottie, Snow has a bit of a disadvantage to start off with. When Scottie first took over he had manly Jeff Gannon to grasp on to, at times when the questioning got hard.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike Scottie, Snow has a bit of a disadvantage to start off with. When Scottie first took over he had manly Jeff Gannon to grasp on to, at times when the questioning got hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32173</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32173</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I get credit every day&#038; &lt;/i&gt;

..but i'd prefer cash.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I get credit every day&#038; </i></p>
<p>..but i&#8217;d prefer cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32172</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32172</guid>
		<description>"I get credit every day&#038; from the people that count Paul"

Of course you do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I get credit every day&#038; from the people that count Paul&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32171</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32171</guid>
		<description>I repeat:

Well, how long has McLellan been on the job since he found out that A) he works for liars and B) The liars thought of him as a convenient dishrag? Wow, what character, what class. McClellan is a scumbag along with the rest of them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I repeat:</p>
<p>Well, how long has McLellan been on the job since he found out that A) he works for liars and B) The liars thought of him as a convenient dishrag? Wow, what character, what class. McClellan is a scumbag along with the rest of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32170</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32170</guid>
		<description>I get credit every day...from the people that count Paul
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get credit every day&#8230;from the people that count Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32169</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32169</guid>
		<description>As to your "medical practice" I'll hold you to your own standard:  You don t get credit unless you show your work&#038; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to your &#8220;medical practice&#8221; I&#8217;ll hold you to your own standard:  You don t get credit unless you show your work&#038; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32168</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32168</guid>
		<description>" He told the reporters that he was told that Rove and Libby weren t involved."

That's what I meant when I wrote:"Now was McClellan in on the deception or a mere dupe of higher ups?" Rove may not have knowingly lied but he  passed on the lies of others as truth. pedro is all offended because of what he perceives as a slight to McLellan's character. Well, how long has McLellan been on the job since he found out that A) he works for liars and B) The liars thought of him as a convenient dishrag? Wow, what character, what class. McClellan is a scumbag along with the rest of them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; He told the reporters that he was told that Rove and Libby weren t involved.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I meant when I wrote:&#8221;Now was McClellan in on the deception or a mere dupe of higher ups?&#8221; Rove may not have knowingly lied but he  passed on the lies of others as truth. pedro is all offended because of what he perceives as a slight to McLellan&#8217;s character. Well, how long has McLellan been on the job since he found out that A) he works for liars and B) The liars thought of him as a convenient dishrag? Wow, what character, what class. McClellan is a scumbag along with the rest of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32167</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32167</guid>
		<description>I'm not going to get bogged down in conservative nonsense of documenting the obvious. You guys would want a thirty page report if I said the sky was blue. But start &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;rls=GGGL,GGGL:2005-09,GGGL:en&#038;q=site:thinkprogress.org+%22Scott+McClellan%22" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to get bogged down in conservative nonsense of documenting the obvious. You guys would want a thirty page report if I said the sky was blue. But start <a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;rls=GGGL,GGGL:2005-09,GGGL:en&#038;q=site:thinkprogress.org+%22Scott+McClellan%22" rel="nofollow">here</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32166</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32166</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You guys would want a thirty page report if I said the sky was blue. But start... &lt;/i&gt;
And they'd still disagree.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You guys would want a thirty page report if I said the sky was blue. But start&#8230; </i><br />
And they&#8217;d still disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32165</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32165</guid>
		<description>"You don t get credit unless you show your work&#038; "

Which reminds me, we're still waiting for those publishing citations of yours, pedro ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You don t get credit unless you show your work&#038; &#8221;</p>
<p>Which reminds me, we&#8217;re still waiting for those publishing citations of yours, pedro &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garth</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32164</link>
		<dc:creator>garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32164</guid>
		<description>pedro, bush's lies are translated to the press by the press secretary. Bush has lied about:

Domestic wiretapping
Uniting, not dividing
"changing the tone"
helping the poor
helping with gas costs
preserving SS
helping the military
wether or not we were going to war in Iraq
wether or not he was going to fire the person/people who leaked information in re Plame
Clean Air.
Clean Water.
Toxins in our environment
the disbursement of his tax cuts
giving one god-damn about anyone who is not as wealthy or wealthier than he is

and on,
and on,
and on.

McLelland repeated those lies. are you dim? Are you a tiny baby grasping at mama neocon's tit? repeating a lie is lying too, you know.

you can find your own references to the above. If you think coming and trolling someone's comments is a place to have a well-orchestrated airing of facts, you're an ass. They're out there, you just can't see it. you're an ideological hack who trolls comments. does that make you feel good?

They're pretty well-documented. and if you want to split hairs over the definition of a lie, well, you're an ass.

finally, i think you're an ass.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pedro, bush&#8217;s lies are translated to the press by the press secretary. Bush has lied about:</p>
<p>Domestic wiretapping<br />
Uniting, not dividing<br />
&#8220;changing the tone&#8221;<br />
helping the poor<br />
helping with gas costs<br />
preserving SS<br />
helping the military<br />
wether or not we were going to war in Iraq<br />
wether or not he was going to fire the person/people who leaked information in re Plame<br />
Clean Air.<br />
Clean Water.<br />
Toxins in our environment<br />
the disbursement of his tax cuts<br />
giving one god-damn about anyone who is not as wealthy or wealthier than he is</p>
<p>and on,<br />
and on,<br />
and on.</p>
<p>McLelland repeated those lies. are you dim? Are you a tiny baby grasping at mama neocon&#8217;s tit? repeating a lie is lying too, you know.</p>
<p>you can find your own references to the above. If you think coming and trolling someone&#8217;s comments is a place to have a well-orchestrated airing of facts, you&#8217;re an ass. They&#8217;re out there, you just can&#8217;t see it. you&#8217;re an ideological hack who trolls comments. does that make you feel good?</p>
<p>They&#8217;re pretty well-documented. and if you want to split hairs over the definition of a lie, well, you&#8217;re an ass.</p>
<p>finally, i think you&#8217;re an ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32163</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32163</guid>
		<description>No Ollie,

Really shrill= not backed by any sort of evidence, and is the cheapest form of ad hominem attack along the lines of "your mother wears combat boots".

So he is a regular liar...how about some evidence?

You keep saying he does so regularly, and that it is "simple".  How about you showing us why?

Remember in math class?  You don't get credit unless you show your work...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Ollie,</p>
<p>Really shrill= not backed by any sort of evidence, and is the cheapest form of ad hominem attack along the lines of &#8220;your mother wears combat boots&#8221;.</p>
<p>So he is a regular liar&#8230;how about some evidence?</p>
<p>You keep saying he does so regularly, and that it is &#8220;simple&#8221;.  How about you showing us why?</p>
<p>Remember in math class?  You don&#8217;t get credit unless you show your work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32162</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32162</guid>
		<description>Depends on how you define "sky"
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on how you define &#8220;sky&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32160</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32160</guid>
		<description>It was bad enough the way that the odiously lying Scott McClellan was called  honest

Oliver do you know Scott?  Have you ever been briefed by scott?

Can you please demonstrate a lie told by scott?

Why is it that I am supposed to just take a leftist bloggers word for it that professional journalist just can't seem to decide if someone is honest or not?

Your commentary has really gotten shrill lately....Things ok at work?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was bad enough the way that the odiously lying Scott McClellan was called  honest</p>
<p>Oliver do you know Scott?  Have you ever been briefed by scott?</p>
<p>Can you please demonstrate a lie told by scott?</p>
<p>Why is it that I am supposed to just take a leftist bloggers word for it that professional journalist just can&#8217;t seem to decide if someone is honest or not?</p>
<p>Your commentary has really gotten shrill lately&#8230;.Things ok at work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32161</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32161</guid>
		<description>Ahem (Clipboard detritus):

"Oliver do you know Scott? Have you ever been briefed by scott?"

Let me guess, ped, you do and you have.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem (Clipboard detritus):</p>
<p>&#8220;Oliver do you know Scott? Have you ever been briefed by scott?&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me guess, ped, you do and you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32159</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32159</guid>
		<description>Really shrill = you disagree. Sigh. Been hearing that for years now.

Look, McClellan's whole job is to lie for Bush, something he did regularly. The press simply had to look at his claims and compare them to the facts. They fail at this most basic function, yet if you even hint that Bill Clinton looked at someone funny its a national crisis.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really shrill = you disagree. Sigh. Been hearing that for years now.</p>
<p>Look, McClellan&#8217;s whole job is to lie for Bush, something he did regularly. The press simply had to look at his claims and compare them to the facts. They fail at this most basic function, yet if you even hint that Bill Clinton looked at someone funny its a national crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32158</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32158</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As for lies told by Scot McClellan he has passed along his share of misinformation hasn t he? Rove and Libby weren t involved in the leak of Plame s name? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think if you look up the transcript, you'll find that McClellan didn't say that, categorically. He told the reporters that &lt;em&gt;he was told&lt;/em&gt; that Rove and Libby weren't involved.

Slippery, yes, but also truthful.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As for lies told by Scot McClellan he has passed along his share of misinformation hasn t he? Rove and Libby weren t involved in the leak of Plame s name? </p></blockquote>
<p>I think if you look up the transcript, you&#8217;ll find that McClellan didn&#8217;t say that, categorically. He told the reporters that <em>he was told</em> that Rove and Libby weren&#8217;t involved.</p>
<p>Slippery, yes, but also truthful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/26/snow-the-pacifier/#comment-32157</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1870#comment-32157</guid>
		<description>"do you think there is a problem with firing someone for leaking information they believe is real?"

Let me guess, ped, you do and you have.

As for lies told by Scot McClellan he has passed along his share of misinformation hasn't he? Rove and Libby weren't involved in the leak of Plame's name? Ya right. Now was McClellan in on the deception or a mere dupe of higher ups? What a choice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;do you think there is a problem with firing someone for leaking information they believe is real?&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me guess, ped, you do and you have.</p>
<p>As for lies told by Scot McClellan he has passed along his share of misinformation hasn&#8217;t he? Rove and Libby weren&#8217;t involved in the leak of Plame&#8217;s name? Ya right. Now was McClellan in on the deception or a mere dupe of higher ups? What a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
