<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wedge, Wedge, Baby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31692</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31692</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s review, for those who don&#039;t read their own blockquotes: &lt;i&gt;In short, you can t simply assume that a tax cut caused the record revenues that followed. Record high revenues happen all the time, no matter what tax policies are implemented.&lt;/i&gt;
I ask you again: Who said that tax decreases, and tax decreases alone, caused revenue increases?
You probably don&#039;t remember this, but someone -- not you -- had said that the tax increases did not cause revenues to increase. Your &quot;meme - breaking&quot; research only served to show that revenues increased with or without tax decreases.
Which means, of course that revenues increased after a tax cut.
So I ask again (that&#039;s three times now) if revenues increase with the tax cuts [thus making the cry that, &quot;We can&#039;t afford tax cuts!&quot; totally bogus], then what is wrong with tax cuts?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s review, for those who don&#8217;t read their own blockquotes: <i>In short, you can t simply assume that a tax cut caused the record revenues that followed. Record high revenues happen all the time, no matter what tax policies are implemented.</i><br />
I ask you again: Who said that tax decreases, and tax decreases alone, caused revenue increases?<br />
You probably don&#8217;t remember this, but someone &#8212; not you &#8212; had said that the tax increases did not cause revenues to increase. Your &#8220;meme &#8211; breaking&#8221; research only served to show that revenues increased with or without tax decreases.<br />
Which means, of course that revenues increased after a tax cut.<br />
So I ask again (that&#8217;s three times now) if revenues increase with the tax cuts [thus making the cry that, "We can't afford tax cuts!" totally bogus], then what is wrong with tax cuts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31691</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31691</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So Quaker only exploded the meme that there weren t any increased revenues before there were tax cuts. And, of course, no one, at anytime, anywhere, said that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s review, for those with impaired short-term memory.

In 45 out of the last 54 fiscal years, tax revenues set a new record. It happened in years when there were tax decreases. It happened in years when there were no tax changes. It happened in years when there were tax increases.

In short, you can&#039;t simply assume that a tax cut &lt;em&gt;caused&lt;/em&gt; the record revenues that followed. Record high revenues happen all the time, no matter what tax policies are implemented.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So Quaker only exploded the meme that there weren t any increased revenues before there were tax cuts. And, of course, no one, at anytime, anywhere, said that.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s review, for those with impaired short-term memory.</p>
<p>In 45 out of the last 54 fiscal years, tax revenues set a new record. It happened in years when there were tax decreases. It happened in years when there were no tax changes. It happened in years when there were tax increases.</p>
<p>In short, you can&#8217;t simply assume that a tax cut <em>caused</em> the record revenues that followed. Record high revenues happen all the time, no matter what tax policies are implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31690</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31690</guid>
		<description>Wow, Farris.

I had no idea you were so acrobatic.

On one hand, you argue gloom and doom that there&#039;s no way the general fund can ever afford to pay off those bogus bonds owed to the Social Security fund. Why, we&#039;ll have to take money away from education or highways or defense.

But at the very same time, everything is all sunshine and roses what with the economy just booming away as a result of those nifty Bush tax cuts. Revenues are up! Hooray!

Your position raises an interesting question: At what rate of economic growth will projected tax revenues be sufficient to cover Social Security obligations? Are we there yet?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Farris.</p>
<p>I had no idea you were so acrobatic.</p>
<p>On one hand, you argue gloom and doom that there&#8217;s no way the general fund can ever afford to pay off those bogus bonds owed to the Social Security fund. Why, we&#8217;ll have to take money away from education or highways or defense.</p>
<p>But at the very same time, everything is all sunshine and roses what with the economy just booming away as a result of those nifty Bush tax cuts. Revenues are up! Hooray!</p>
<p>Your position raises an interesting question: At what rate of economic growth will projected tax revenues be sufficient to cover Social Security obligations? Are we there yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31689</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31689</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know to explain this slowly to you, using a keyboard, midderpidge:

It is a questionnaire. The person who answers the questionnaire -- a reasonable, intelligent and sober person -- obviously, not you midderpidge, -- is being asked to make choices as to what things he thinks the Republican Party should focus on.

In no place, or on any question, is a person asked to decide how well the Republicans are doing in any area, or how well the Democrats might do.
So, while your circuitous attempt at deriding Republicans gets around a &quot;B&quot; for effort, you get an &quot;F&quot; in comprehension, and an &quot;F&quot; in insight.

Total score = D-
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know to explain this slowly to you, using a keyboard, midderpidge:</p>
<p>It is a questionnaire. The person who answers the questionnaire &#8212; a reasonable, intelligent and sober person &#8212; obviously, not you midderpidge, &#8212; is being asked to make choices as to what things he thinks the Republican Party should focus on.</p>
<p>In no place, or on any question, is a person asked to decide how well the Republicans are doing in any area, or how well the Democrats might do.<br />
So, while your circuitous attempt at deriding Republicans gets around a &#8220;B&#8221; for effort, you get an &#8220;F&#8221; in comprehension, and an &#8220;F&#8221; in insight.</p>
<p>Total score = D-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31688</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31688</guid>
		<description>Wow, he&#039;s sending you a message that says don&#039;t vote Republican.  They are doing poorly or failing in nearly every category he named.

Category                                                               Grade

Keeping Taxes Low  (for the wealthy)                            C  (A)
Immigration &amp; border security                                      F
Winning the War On Terror                                           F
Growing Our Economy                                                 C
Improving education                                                    D
Increasing access to affordable health care                    F
Protecting Social Security                                             F
Energy independence                                                   F
Appointing qualified judges                                           D
Strengthening marriage and the family                          C
Morals and ethics in government                                    F
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, he&#8217;s sending you a message that says don&#8217;t vote Republican.  They are doing poorly or failing in nearly every category he named.</p>
<p>Category                                                               Grade</p>
<p>Keeping Taxes Low  (for the wealthy)                            C  (A)<br />
Immigration &#038; border security                                      F<br />
Winning the War On Terror                                           F<br />
Growing Our Economy                                                 C<br />
Improving education                                                    D<br />
Increasing access to affordable health care                    F<br />
Protecting Social Security                                             F<br />
Energy independence                                                   F<br />
Appointing qualified judges                                           D<br />
Strengthening marriage and the family                          C<br />
Morals and ethics in government                                    F</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qkslvr_wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31687</link>
		<dc:creator>qkslvr_wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31687</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the revenue things is funny funny funny.  &quot;revenues are up!  The economy is growing!&quot;

It always does that.

And yes, social security might actually be in trouble now, after bush has been raiding it to pay for Bush&#039;s Boondoggle.

You guys are aboslutely amazing.  You take a budget surplus, squander it, then brag about it.

You also are all about private citizens investing stupidly, but get upset and complain about &quot;IOUs&quot; when the government invests safely.

WTF?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the revenue things is funny funny funny.  &#8220;revenues are up!  The economy is growing!&#8221;</p>
<p>It always does that.</p>
<p>And yes, social security might actually be in trouble now, after bush has been raiding it to pay for Bush&#8217;s Boondoggle.</p>
<p>You guys are aboslutely amazing.  You take a budget surplus, squander it, then brag about it.</p>
<p>You also are all about private citizens investing stupidly, but get upset and complain about &#8220;IOUs&#8221; when the government invests safely.</p>
<p>WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31686</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31686</guid>
		<description>fact check: &lt;i&gt;aren t TAX CUTS resulting in TOO MUCH TAXATION?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Does not compute...  Does not compute... Must lie down...&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fact check: <i>aren t TAX CUTS resulting in TOO MUCH TAXATION?</i></p>
<p><i> Does not compute&#8230;  Does not compute&#8230; Must lie down&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31685</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31685</guid>
		<description>Got this from Ken Mehlman today: Note the ABSENCE of any mention of stem cell research

1.) Which issues will be most important in determining your vote this November? (select up to three)
Keeping Taxes Low
Immigration &amp; border security
Winning the War On Terror
Growing Our Economy
Improving education
Increasing access to affordable health care
Protecting Social Security
Energy independence
Appointing qualified judges
Strengthening marriage and the family
Morals and ethics in government

2.) What is the most important reason for maintaining and expanding our Republican majorities in 2006? (select one)
To ensure that America continues to stand united and strong in fighting the War on Terror
To help President Bush enact his reform agenda for America
To keep Democrat leaders like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Howard Dean from pushing through their extreme left-wing agenda
To make President Bush&#039;s tax cuts permanent and keep our economy growing
To uphold our nation&#039;s bedrock values

3.) If the Democrats win control of the Congress in 2006, what is the one thing you would be most worried would happen?
Democrats will try to censure or impeach President Bush
Democrat would raise your taxes
Democrats would cut and run from the central front in the War on Terror
Democrats would sell out American values to Hollywood liberals
Democrats would impose government-run health care

4.) As you know, President Bush has announced a bold reform agenda for 2006. Which of his initiatives is most important to you? (select one)
Fighting and Winning the War on Terror
Comprehensive immigration reform that secures our borders
Making tax relief permanent for all taxpayers
Making America more competitive in the global marketplace
Reducing America&#039;s dependence on foreign sources of energy by half

5.) From which sources do you receive most of your news and political information? (select multiple)
ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
Fox News Channel
CNN
MSNBC
News websites
Blogs
Daily Newspaper
Radio
E-mail
News/Opinion Magazines
Friends and Family
Other

6.) On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend voting Republican in the next election to a friend or a colleague?

7.) As an online activist, what features would you like to see on GOP.com? (select multiple)
More ways to connect with fellow Republicans
Volunteer opportunities in my area
Web videos &amp; podcasts with key newsmakers
Online polls
The latest breaking news
Information on the issues important to me
Information on GOP candidates and elected officials
Online Diaries from GOP political leaders
Other

8.) In what year were you born?

9.) Did you vote in the year 2004?
Yes
No
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this from Ken Mehlman today: Note the ABSENCE of any mention of stem cell research</p>
<p>1.) Which issues will be most important in determining your vote this November? (select up to three)<br />
Keeping Taxes Low<br />
Immigration &#038; border security<br />
Winning the War On Terror<br />
Growing Our Economy<br />
Improving education<br />
Increasing access to affordable health care<br />
Protecting Social Security<br />
Energy independence<br />
Appointing qualified judges<br />
Strengthening marriage and the family<br />
Morals and ethics in government</p>
<p>2.) What is the most important reason for maintaining and expanding our Republican majorities in 2006? (select one)<br />
To ensure that America continues to stand united and strong in fighting the War on Terror<br />
To help President Bush enact his reform agenda for America<br />
To keep Democrat leaders like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Howard Dean from pushing through their extreme left-wing agenda<br />
To make President Bush&#8217;s tax cuts permanent and keep our economy growing<br />
To uphold our nation&#8217;s bedrock values</p>
<p>3.) If the Democrats win control of the Congress in 2006, what is the one thing you would be most worried would happen?<br />
Democrats will try to censure or impeach President Bush<br />
Democrat would raise your taxes<br />
Democrats would cut and run from the central front in the War on Terror<br />
Democrats would sell out American values to Hollywood liberals<br />
Democrats would impose government-run health care</p>
<p>4.) As you know, President Bush has announced a bold reform agenda for 2006. Which of his initiatives is most important to you? (select one)<br />
Fighting and Winning the War on Terror<br />
Comprehensive immigration reform that secures our borders<br />
Making tax relief permanent for all taxpayers<br />
Making America more competitive in the global marketplace<br />
Reducing America&#8217;s dependence on foreign sources of energy by half</p>
<p>5.) From which sources do you receive most of your news and political information? (select multiple)<br />
ABC News<br />
CBS News<br />
NBC News<br />
Fox News Channel<br />
CNN<br />
MSNBC<br />
News websites<br />
Blogs<br />
Daily Newspaper<br />
Radio<br />
E-mail<br />
News/Opinion Magazines<br />
Friends and Family<br />
Other</p>
<p>6.) On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend voting Republican in the next election to a friend or a colleague?</p>
<p>7.) As an online activist, what features would you like to see on GOP.com? (select multiple)<br />
More ways to connect with fellow Republicans<br />
Volunteer opportunities in my area<br />
Web videos &#038; podcasts with key newsmakers<br />
Online polls<br />
The latest breaking news<br />
Information on the issues important to me<br />
Information on GOP candidates and elected officials<br />
Online Diaries from GOP political leaders<br />
Other</p>
<p>8.) In what year were you born?</p>
<p>9.) Did you vote in the year 2004?<br />
Yes<br />
No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31684</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31684</guid>
		<description>JK,perhaps you could explain yourself &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; you insult me. It makes you look a wee bit less like an ass.

fact check: Very clever comment... Did you think of it all by yourself, or did your second grade teacher help you?


midderpidge: What does increasing revenue have to do with decreasing the deficit, &lt;i&gt;if the spending keeps increasing&lt;/i&gt;/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK,perhaps you could explain yourself <i>before</i> you insult me. It makes you look a wee bit less like an ass.</p>
<p>fact check: Very clever comment&#8230; Did you think of it all by yourself, or did your second grade teacher help you?</p>
<p>midderpidge: What does increasing revenue have to do with decreasing the deficit, <i>if the spending keeps increasing</i>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31683</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31683</guid>
		<description>JK: Apparently, even though I&#039;m dumber than dirt, I&#039;m smarter than you...
F.I.C.A. is a Tax.
Increasing it was the sleight of hand Clinton (he who did  away with the deficit without decreasing spending) used to &quot;balance the budget.&quot;

As for Quaker&#039;s &quot;blowing up that foolish meme&quot;, if revenues have increased because of the tax cuts, then what&#039;s wrong with the tax cuts?

And second, increases in revenues because personal incomes have increased means that the chunk coming out of people&#039;s wallets is the same.

Not so with tax cuts. So Quaker only exploded the meme that there weren&#039;t any increased revenues before there were tax cuts. And, of course, no one, at anytime, anywhere, said that.

Sort of like &quot;proving&quot; there aren&#039;t any McDonald&#039;s on Jupiter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK: Apparently, even though I&#8217;m dumber than dirt, I&#8217;m smarter than you&#8230;<br />
F.I.C.A. is a Tax.<br />
Increasing it was the sleight of hand Clinton (he who did  away with the deficit without decreasing spending) used to &#8220;balance the budget.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for Quaker&#8217;s &#8220;blowing up that foolish meme&#8221;, if revenues have increased because of the tax cuts, then what&#8217;s wrong with the tax cuts?</p>
<p>And second, increases in revenues because personal incomes have increased means that the chunk coming out of people&#8217;s wallets is the same.</p>
<p>Not so with tax cuts. So Quaker only exploded the meme that there weren&#8217;t any increased revenues before there were tax cuts. And, of course, no one, at anytime, anywhere, said that.</p>
<p>Sort of like &#8220;proving&#8221; there aren&#8217;t any McDonald&#8217;s on Jupiter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31682</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31682</guid>
		<description>If the federal deficit picture is so rosy, why the hell are you so worried about social security?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the federal deficit picture is so rosy, why the hell are you so worried about social security?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31681</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31681</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Only tax increases can decrease the budget deficit&amp;

How&#039;d that work out for Clinton without one GOP vote in 1993?

Man, you are as dumb as dirt.

JK
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>Only tax increases can decrease the budget deficit&#038;</p>
<p>How&#8217;d that work out for Clinton without one GOP vote in 1993?</p>
<p>Man, you are as dumb as dirt.</p>
<p>JK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31680</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31680</guid>
		<description>JK, I see no reason to denigrate dirt like that.  Dirt has a purpose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK, I see no reason to denigrate dirt like that.  Dirt has a purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31679</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31679</guid>
		<description>SaveFarris: You just don&#039;t understand... Congress views all revenue as a &quot;Gift from God&quot; to be spent on whatever they want.

Only tax increases can decrease the budget deficit...

After all, that&#039;s how most people handle their family&#039;s budget deficits -- by robbing the local liquor store?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaveFarris: You just don&#8217;t understand&#8230; Congress views all revenue as a &#8220;Gift from God&#8221; to be spent on whatever they want.</p>
<p>Only tax increases can decrease the budget deficit&#8230;</p>
<p>After all, that&#8217;s how most people handle their family&#8217;s budget deficits &#8212; by robbing the local liquor store?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31678</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31678</guid>
		<description>Guess noone has seen any &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/01/the_disappearin.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent data from the Fed&lt;/a&gt;.  After the Tax Cuts, revenues are ... UP, growing the economy just like we said they would.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess noone has seen any <a href="http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/01/the_disappearin.html" rel="nofollow">recent data from the Fed</a>.  After the Tax Cuts, revenues are &#8230; UP, growing the economy just like we said they would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31677</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31677</guid>
		<description>Yes, revenues are up- just like the have been in 45 of the last 54 years, taking a break only during the Republican recessions.  Thanks to Quaker for blowing up that foolish meme.

Although, if Farris even believes the stupid memes he puts forth here, aren&#039;t TAX CUTS resulting in TOO MUCH TAXATION?  That would be the logical divination, right?  The more tax cuts, the more revenues, right!  So by tax cuts, the cons are actually RAISING the tax burden in this country!  Great work!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, revenues are up- just like the have been in 45 of the last 54 years, taking a break only during the Republican recessions.  Thanks to Quaker for blowing up that foolish meme.</p>
<p>Although, if Farris even believes the stupid memes he puts forth here, aren&#8217;t TAX CUTS resulting in TOO MUCH TAXATION?  That would be the logical divination, right?  The more tax cuts, the more revenues, right!  So by tax cuts, the cons are actually RAISING the tax burden in this country!  Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31676</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31676</guid>
		<description>Or just remove the cap on SS contributions.  Of course, the cons KNOW there is no danger in losing ss, the biggest danger is the cons themselves.

Farris has obviously overdosed on the kool-aid.  He must be snorting it or injecting it or something by now.  I guess none of this kool-aid is enough to make that young republican even CONSIDER joining the military so he can fight for the war he wants.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just remove the cap on SS contributions.  Of course, the cons KNOW there is no danger in losing ss, the biggest danger is the cons themselves.</p>
<p>Farris has obviously overdosed on the kool-aid.  He must be snorting it or injecting it or something by now.  I guess none of this kool-aid is enough to make that young republican even CONSIDER joining the military so he can fight for the war he wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelFB</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31675</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31675</guid>
		<description>SaveFarris said:&lt;blockquote&gt;That s why the situation must be dealt with NOW and not kicked down the road like all the  There Is No Crisis  folks want to do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The only real solution is to roll back not make permanent tax cuts we won&#039;t be able to afford 10 years from now - but your crowd stick their fingers in their ears and shout, &quot;LA LA LA LA! I can&#039;t hear you!&quot; when anyone tries to point that out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaveFarris said:<br />
<blockquote>That s why the situation must be dealt with NOW and not kicked down the road like all the  There Is No Crisis  folks want to do.</p></blockquote>
<p>The only real solution is to roll back not make permanent tax cuts we won&#8217;t be able to afford 10 years from now &#8211; but your crowd stick their fingers in their ears and shout, &#8220;LA LA LA LA! I can&#8217;t hear you!&#8221; when anyone tries to point that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midderpidge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31674</link>
		<dc:creator>midderpidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31674</guid>
		<description>Then deal with the situation SaveFarris, the crisis situation is the sky rocketing federal budget deficits not social security.  War and tax cuts.  Jacking the social security system doesn&#039;t change this.  Adding Bush&#039;s transition costs can only make it worse.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then deal with the situation SaveFarris, the crisis situation is the sky rocketing federal budget deficits not social security.  War and tax cuts.  Jacking the social security system doesn&#8217;t change this.  Adding Bush&#8217;s transition costs can only make it worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/24/wedge-wedge-baby/#comment-31673</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1841#comment-31673</guid>
		<description>Bingo!  That&#039;s why the situation must be dealt with NOW and not kicked down the road like all the &quot;There Is No Crisis&quot; folks want to do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo!  That&#8217;s why the situation must be dealt with NOW and not kicked down the road like all the &#8220;There Is No Crisis&#8221; folks want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

