<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Lacrosse Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:38:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: trevorwells</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31745</link>
		<dc:creator>trevorwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31745</guid>
		<description>Dugger,

I am feeling great now that I know a Democratic tsunami is brewing:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Anyway, the poll results from SurveyUSA on behalf of WTVD say it all:

41% believe a rape occured, 43% do not and the rest 16% are not sure.

The racial polarization in the community that I&#039;ve spoken of is plainly evident in a poll conducted last week of 500 adults in the RDU viewing area. The defense strategy of polarizing the community is clearly working and will seriously impact the selection of jurors in this case to the extent that the trial should be moved out of metro RDU into another area like the Triad or Charlotte where the intensity of coverage is not so ominpresent. According to WTVD, &quot;Males were slightly more likely than females to believe the rape occurred. An overwhelming number of black respondents - - 72 percent - - believed that a rape occurred, while just 27 percent of whites agreed. Fifty-six percent of whites did not believe the rape accusation, with only 15 percent of blacks agreeing. &quot;

As I&#039;ve said before, no matter what the truth of this case is, we&#039;ll find it out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger,</p>
<p>I am feeling great now that I know a Democratic tsunami is brewing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.democracycorps.com/weekly/Public_Polling_Report_-_April_24_06.pdf</a></p>
<p>Anyway, the poll results from SurveyUSA on behalf of WTVD say it all:</p>
<p>41% believe a rape occured, 43% do not and the rest 16% are not sure.</p>
<p>The racial polarization in the community that I&#8217;ve spoken of is plainly evident in a poll conducted last week of 500 adults in the RDU viewing area. The defense strategy of polarizing the community is clearly working and will seriously impact the selection of jurors in this case to the extent that the trial should be moved out of metro RDU into another area like the Triad or Charlotte where the intensity of coverage is not so ominpresent. According to WTVD, &#8220;Males were slightly more likely than females to believe the rape occurred. An overwhelming number of black respondents &#8211; - 72 percent &#8211; - believed that a rape occurred, while just 27 percent of whites agreed. Fifty-six percent of whites did not believe the rape accusation, with only 15 percent of blacks agreeing. &#8221;</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, no matter what the truth of this case is, we&#8217;ll find it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31744</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31744</guid>
		<description>Trevor,

&quot;Haven t heard from ya in awhile. Hope all is well.&quot;

Quite well. And you, Trevor?

Unfortunately you seem to be hopelessly biased against the defendants in this case. Witness: &quot;deliberately overplayed to polarize the community along racial lines &quot;.  Some mind reading going on there my friend - on behalf of the accuser.  Smells like a progressive lynch mob (which I guess must be OK if the lynching is in support of a progressive political cause - just like leaking, huh - some is OK) to me.

Dugger,   Put down the rope and  lets just let the facts, instead of race or sexual orientation,  determine this case.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor,</p>
<p>&#8220;Haven t heard from ya in awhile. Hope all is well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quite well. And you, Trevor?</p>
<p>Unfortunately you seem to be hopelessly biased against the defendants in this case. Witness: &#8220;deliberately overplayed to polarize the community along racial lines &#8220;.  Some mind reading going on there my friend &#8211; on behalf of the accuser.  Smells like a progressive lynch mob (which I guess must be OK if the lynching is in support of a progressive political cause &#8211; just like leaking, huh &#8211; some is OK) to me.</p>
<p>Dugger,   Put down the rope and  lets just let the facts, instead of race or sexual orientation,  determine this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31743</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31743</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How far is it from gay-bashing to sexual assault and rape. I don t think its that far.&lt;/i&gt;
Well, good for you.

But, it is far.

Very far.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How far is it from gay-bashing to sexual assault and rape. I don t think its that far.</i><br />
Well, good for you.</p>
<p>But, it is far.</p>
<p>Very far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31742</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31742</guid>
		<description>This case really demonstrated the reverse bias in the media...

Remember how it was all set up in the beginning?

Not &quot;A drug-addled stripper accuses lacrosse player of rape&quot; but &quot;College co-ed from the poor little college across town&quot;....

Comeon guys, give me a break...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case really demonstrated the reverse bias in the media&#8230;</p>
<p>Remember how it was all set up in the beginning?</p>
<p>Not &#8220;A drug-addled stripper accuses lacrosse player of rape&#8221; but &#8220;College co-ed from the poor little college across town&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Comeon guys, give me a break&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevorwells</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31741</link>
		<dc:creator>trevorwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31741</guid>
		<description>Dugger,

Haven&#039;t heard from ya in awhile. Hope all is well.  Anyway, there are a set of facts in this case and based on biased media coverage, they form the basis the defense case.  The number one fact we have is that there is no DNA match.  That was deliberately overplayed to polarize the community along racial lines and make the accuser look as uncredible as possible. The fact that most rape convictions are obtained without a DNA foundation is totally left unremarked upon.  Secondly, we have an indicted individual with a history of gratutious violence in the form of gay-bashing.   How far is it from gay-bashing to sexual assault and rape.  I don&#039;t think its that far.  Lastly, we have timeline issues and cell phone photos which conflict with the victim&#039;s account of events.  These will have to be resolved in the course of the prosecution.  Overall, I am inclined to believe this girl as are most of the people I&#039;ve spoken with.  We are pleased that the District Attorney has the courage of his convictions and is poised to press forward agressively in this matter.  I believe that the truth, whatever it may be will emerge.  I just hope that we allow it to emerge by re-electing him next week.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger,</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t heard from ya in awhile. Hope all is well.  Anyway, there are a set of facts in this case and based on biased media coverage, they form the basis the defense case.  The number one fact we have is that there is no DNA match.  That was deliberately overplayed to polarize the community along racial lines and make the accuser look as uncredible as possible. The fact that most rape convictions are obtained without a DNA foundation is totally left unremarked upon.  Secondly, we have an indicted individual with a history of gratutious violence in the form of gay-bashing.   How far is it from gay-bashing to sexual assault and rape.  I don&#8217;t think its that far.  Lastly, we have timeline issues and cell phone photos which conflict with the victim&#8217;s account of events.  These will have to be resolved in the course of the prosecution.  Overall, I am inclined to believe this girl as are most of the people I&#8217;ve spoken with.  We are pleased that the District Attorney has the courage of his convictions and is poised to press forward agressively in this matter.  I believe that the truth, whatever it may be will emerge.  I just hope that we allow it to emerge by re-electing him next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31740</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31740</guid>
		<description>trevor,

You do understand that there are a set of facts to this case?  Those facts have nothing to do with skin color or past social history or previous remarks about a diffreent topic by one of the accuused. Your kind of comment is what would scare me.  You seem to imply that justice will be renderd by finding the accused guilty -0 becasue of skin color and past remarks etc.    Otherwise why all the extraneous BS.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trevor,</p>
<p>You do understand that there are a set of facts to this case?  Those facts have nothing to do with skin color or past social history or previous remarks about a diffreent topic by one of the accuused. Your kind of comment is what would scare me.  You seem to imply that justice will be renderd by finding the accused guilty -0 becasue of skin color and past remarks etc.    Otherwise why all the extraneous BS.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31739</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31739</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It is a sad state of affairs when both sides in a rape case try to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;d take it a step further, and say &quot;It is a sad state of affairs when either side of any case tries to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is a sad state of affairs when both sides in a rape case try to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;d take it a step further, and say &#8220;It is a sad state of affairs when either side of any case tries to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevorwells</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31738</link>
		<dc:creator>trevorwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31738</guid>
		<description>Forced by defense attorneys divulging her identity, Kim Roberts has stepped forward as the second dancer in the Duke Lacrosse rape case. Underlying her story that corroborates much of what the unnamed accuser has said is a past history of embezzlement. Her credibility as well as that of the accuser will be put on trial in a manner in which polarizes the white community to take sides with their lighter skinned comrade with a history of gay-bashing. It is iteresting that the Duke community is willing to take the word of a hyper-aggressive gay basher over that of a woman with little to gain from being exposed as a part of this case.


The politics of race is sometimes nonsensical. Upper middle class sons of privilege playing the victim card over women subjected to racial taunts and sexual assault is a prime example of trying to have it both ways. We are supposed to overlook the lacrosse team&#039;s criminality and run-ins with the law and magnify the past transgressions of the real victims here. The defense plays to the bias in our puritan culture that says unless you&#039;re as pure as the driven snow, don&#039;t attempt to get justice when someone violates you sexually.


It is significant that a prominent white woman in our community, News &amp; Observer columnist Ruth Sheehan, admited to not pressing charges 21 years ago when she was raped. She didn&#039;t want to be tried as though she were the criminal. It is a sad state of affairs when both sides in a rape case try to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved. I cannot wait for the real victim to take the stand and tell her story to the world.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forced by defense attorneys divulging her identity, Kim Roberts has stepped forward as the second dancer in the Duke Lacrosse rape case. Underlying her story that corroborates much of what the unnamed accuser has said is a past history of embezzlement. Her credibility as well as that of the accuser will be put on trial in a manner in which polarizes the white community to take sides with their lighter skinned comrade with a history of gay-bashing. It is iteresting that the Duke community is willing to take the word of a hyper-aggressive gay basher over that of a woman with little to gain from being exposed as a part of this case.</p>
<p>The politics of race is sometimes nonsensical. Upper middle class sons of privilege playing the victim card over women subjected to racial taunts and sexual assault is a prime example of trying to have it both ways. We are supposed to overlook the lacrosse team&#8217;s criminality and run-ins with the law and magnify the past transgressions of the real victims here. The defense plays to the bias in our puritan culture that says unless you&#8217;re as pure as the driven snow, don&#8217;t attempt to get justice when someone violates you sexually.</p>
<p>It is significant that a prominent white woman in our community, News &#038; Observer columnist Ruth Sheehan, admited to not pressing charges 21 years ago when she was raped. She didn&#8217;t want to be tried as though she were the criminal. It is a sad state of affairs when both sides in a rape case try to claim victimhood when there is only one side that can legitimately lay claim to being aggrieved. I cannot wait for the real victim to take the stand and tell her story to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31737</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31737</guid>
		<description>qkslvr_wolf : Why is this national news? Honestly, IDGaF.

We agree on one thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qkslvr_wolf : Why is this national news? Honestly, IDGaF.</p>
<p>We agree on one thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31736</link>
		<dc:creator>scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31736</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Americans with money don t join the military.&lt;/i&gt;

During my ten years on active duty, I served with many who could be considered well off, and at least two who could be considered rich.  As JWG pointed out, though, these were officers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Americans with money don t join the military.</i></p>
<p>During my ten years on active duty, I served with many who could be considered well off, and at least two who could be considered rich.  As JWG pointed out, though, these were officers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qkslvr_wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31735</link>
		<dc:creator>qkslvr_wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31735</guid>
		<description>Why is this national news?  Honestly, IDGaF.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this national news?  Honestly, IDGaF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31734</guid>
		<description>Good post Dana.  For a while, the prevailing sentiment in Big Media was that this was being covered up because of the race of the victims versus the accused.  Now that it appears much more complex and doesn&#039;t fit the usual stereotypes, &#039;there is too much coverage.&#039;

I don&#039;t know, but this is now appearing closer to Tawana Brawley than the Scottsboro boys.  We&#039;ll see.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Dana.  For a while, the prevailing sentiment in Big Media was that this was being covered up because of the race of the victims versus the accused.  Now that it appears much more complex and doesn&#8217;t fit the usual stereotypes, &#8216;there is too much coverage.&#8217;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, but this is now appearing closer to Tawana Brawley than the Scottsboro boys.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31733</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31733</guid>
		<description>Dana: But isn&#039;t pulling an opinion &quot;out of thin air&quot; -- a euphemism for your nethermost orifice -- so much more fun?

I stopped caring about this case a while back  -- probably on &quot;the anniversary&quot; of the Holloway case (which I stopped caring about a &lt;i&gt;looong&lt;/i&gt; time ago.

I am looking forward to possible &quot;civil disturbances&quot; when the white guys are exonerated -- thanks to the already flapping lips of politicians, both black and white.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana: But isn&#8217;t pulling an opinion &#8220;out of thin air&#8221; &#8212; a euphemism for your nethermost orifice &#8212; so much more fun?</p>
<p>I stopped caring about this case a while back  &#8212; probably on &#8220;the anniversary&#8221; of the Holloway case (which I stopped caring about a <i>looong</i> time ago.</p>
<p>I am looking forward to possible &#8220;civil disturbances&#8221; when the white guys are exonerated &#8212; thanks to the already flapping lips of politicians, both black and white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31732</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31732</guid>
		<description>&quot;two much coverage?&quot;  :)

This is one of those stories about which most people have an opinion, and few facts to buttress their opinion.

The young lady in question may or may not have been raped, and if she was raped, the two young gentlemen charged with the crime may or may not have been the rapists.

The last I heard, the DNA didn&#039;t match anyone on the lacrosse team, but the DA went ahead anyway; unless he&#039;s a total loon, he must think he has &lt;i&gt;something.&lt;/i&gt;  One of the gentlemen charged apparently has an iron-clad alibi, but, again, who knows how that will turn out.

I think that the wisest course of action is simply to wait and see what actually happens.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;two much coverage?&#8221;  <img src='http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This is one of those stories about which most people have an opinion, and few facts to buttress their opinion.</p>
<p>The young lady in question may or may not have been raped, and if she was raped, the two young gentlemen charged with the crime may or may not have been the rapists.</p>
<p>The last I heard, the DNA didn&#8217;t match anyone on the lacrosse team, but the DA went ahead anyway; unless he&#8217;s a total loon, he must think he has <i>something.</i>  One of the gentlemen charged apparently has an iron-clad alibi, but, again, who knows how that will turn out.</p>
<p>I think that the wisest course of action is simply to wait and see what actually happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31731</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31731</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Americans with money don t join the military&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Of course they do. They tend to go to college and become officers (at least at the colleges that don&#039;t force the military away), which is probably why you couldn&#039;t find any.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Americans with money don t join the military</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course they do. They tend to go to college and become officers (at least at the colleges that don&#8217;t force the military away), which is probably why you couldn&#8217;t find any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sooperedd</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31730</link>
		<dc:creator>sooperedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31730</guid>
		<description>Americans with money don&#039;t join the military. The military is where the poor folks and those with no better options end up. Did my three years in the Army and the Gulf War and did not run in to anyone that was from a  wealthy family. Why don&#039;t the rich folks demonstrate their patriotism and join the war effort?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans with money don&#8217;t join the military. The military is where the poor folks and those with no better options end up. Did my three years in the Army and the Gulf War and did not run in to anyone that was from a  wealthy family. Why don&#8217;t the rich folks demonstrate their patriotism and join the war effort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cypher</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31729</link>
		<dc:creator>cypher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31729</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know whether they are rapists or not, I lean towards not, but considering the age of our troops, I know these privileged punks are certainly not boys.

And hell, as I recommended for Ben Domenech, if these guys weren&#039;t rapists,  I nevertheless think their next dormitory should be in Baghdad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether they are rapists or not, I lean towards not, but considering the age of our troops, I know these privileged punks are certainly not boys.</p>
<p>And hell, as I recommended for Ben Domenech, if these guys weren&#8217;t rapists,  I nevertheless think their next dormitory should be in Baghdad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sooperedd</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/23/duke-lacrosse-coverage/#comment-31728</link>
		<dc:creator>sooperedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1844#comment-31728</guid>
		<description>We should refer to them more accurately as the two privileged punks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should refer to them more accurately as the two privileged punks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
