<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making It Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:01:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31047</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31047</guid>
		<description>Better than a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstagetour/chicks/chicks1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blimp full of helium&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better than a <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstagetour/chicks/chicks1.html" rel="nofollow">blimp full of helium</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31046</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31046</guid>
		<description>Oliver, I&#039;m surprised at you. Nothing about Scott McLellan&#039;s resignation? At least he hasn&#039;t said he wants to spend more time with the family (read: under investigation).

I was thinking how funny it would be if Pappa Bear O&#039;Reilly was Press Secretary.

Frank; he&#039;s so smart he can&#039;t work the remote control!

hehe
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, I&#8217;m surprised at you. Nothing about Scott McLellan&#8217;s resignation? At least he hasn&#8217;t said he wants to spend more time with the family (read: under investigation).</p>
<p>I was thinking how funny it would be if Pappa Bear O&#8217;Reilly was Press Secretary.</p>
<p>Frank; he&#8217;s so smart he can&#8217;t work the remote control!</p>
<p>hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31045</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31045</guid>
		<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=133250&amp;pt=todaysnews&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Radio Ink&lt;/a&gt;: (re: the &quot;Snow as WH press secretary&quot; buzz) &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;One big factor in Snow&#039;s favor is that the Bush administration seems to like all things Fox News, as evidenced by the recent release of Vice President Cheney&#039;s list of requests during hotel stays. One is that all TVs in his suite be tuned to the Fox News Channel.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No wonder he&#039;s so smart!
&lt;i&gt;Hehe&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=133250&#038;pt=todaysnews" rel="nofollow">Radio Ink</a>: (re: the &#8220;Snow as WH press secretary&#8221; buzz)<br />
<blockquote><i>One big factor in Snow&#8217;s favor is that the Bush administration seems to like all things Fox News, as evidenced by the recent release of Vice President Cheney&#8217;s list of requests during hotel stays. One is that all TVs in his suite be tuned to the Fox News Channel.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>No wonder he&#8217;s so smart!<br />
<i>Hehe</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31044</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31044</guid>
		<description>OK, Roni, your freedom to be an asshole is indivisible.
Excuse me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Roni, your freedom to be an asshole is indivisible.<br />
Excuse me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roni</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31043</link>
		<dc:creator>Roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31043</guid>
		<description>Frank_D Says:
April 19th, 2006 at 9:36 pm

Roni: Do me one favor. Before you go off on me the next time, please direct me to one comment you have made on this whole weblog that is on topic, and not devoted entirely to other commenters?
Everyone   yes, everyone   on this blog slings all kinds of mud at other commenters. But, in most instances, you can find amidst the mud, an actual comment, and maybe even a link to other info.
When you ve actually made a comment, and been attacked by someone who has not even made a comment, but strolled onto the blog to fire at me and move on, as you and Jamy have done, you can t complain about anything.


I should &quot;do you one favor&quot;?  LOL.

It&#039;s not your website ... but you get to spout your own unilaterial rules about how and when people can participate?

I take it your comments about your impending divorce, custody of your 2 teenage sons and posting your street address was somehow &quot;on&quot; topic ...?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank_D Says:<br />
April 19th, 2006 at 9:36 pm</p>
<p>Roni: Do me one favor. Before you go off on me the next time, please direct me to one comment you have made on this whole weblog that is on topic, and not devoted entirely to other commenters?<br />
Everyone   yes, everyone   on this blog slings all kinds of mud at other commenters. But, in most instances, you can find amidst the mud, an actual comment, and maybe even a link to other info.<br />
When you ve actually made a comment, and been attacked by someone who has not even made a comment, but strolled onto the blog to fire at me and move on, as you and Jamy have done, you can t complain about anything.</p>
<p>I should &#8220;do you one favor&#8221;?  LOL.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not your website &#8230; but you get to spout your own unilaterial rules about how and when people can participate?</p>
<p>I take it your comments about your impending divorce, custody of your 2 teenage sons and posting your street address was somehow &#8220;on&#8221; topic &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushwacked</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushwacked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31042</guid>
		<description>Fact 1) The White House may be looking for a press secretary.
McClellan has not been doing too well lately.  Time for a new tap dancer who can dance faster.

Fact 2) They want a press secretary whose views are similar to those of the President

Just proves what Faux&#039;s claim of &quot;Fair and Balanced&quot; meant:
Fair to Bush Only and always OFF Balance to the Right.


Fact 3) (If the CNN story is correct) Tony Snow may have been asked
The fact that he didnt respond is confirmation enough.

Fact 3) There is no information as to whether he said yes or no
It doesn&#039;t matter, the fact that they asked him just helps support claims by democrats that Faux News leans toward this administration and the republican party in their reporting.  They have loaded up their news staff with neoconservative repubicans with only a couple of &quot;token liberals&quot; without the stones to put up a fight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact 1) The White House may be looking for a press secretary.<br />
McClellan has not been doing too well lately.  Time for a new tap dancer who can dance faster.</p>
<p>Fact 2) They want a press secretary whose views are similar to those of the President</p>
<p>Just proves what Faux&#8217;s claim of &#8220;Fair and Balanced&#8221; meant:<br />
Fair to Bush Only and always OFF Balance to the Right.</p>
<p>Fact 3) (If the CNN story is correct) Tony Snow may have been asked<br />
The fact that he didnt respond is confirmation enough.</p>
<p>Fact 3) There is no information as to whether he said yes or no<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter, the fact that they asked him just helps support claims by democrats that Faux News leans toward this administration and the republican party in their reporting.  They have loaded up their news staff with neoconservative repubicans with only a couple of &#8220;token liberals&#8221; without the stones to put up a fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31041</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31041</guid>
		<description>Quaker: I sit corrected. But stand by my comment, as amended.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker: I sit corrected. But stand by my comment, as amended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31040</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31040</guid>
		<description>Roni: Do me one favor. Before you go off on me the next time, please direct me to one comment you have made on this whole weblog that is on topic, and not devoted entirely to other commenters?
Everyone -- yes, everyone -- on this blog slings all kinds of mud at other commenters. But, in most instances, you can find amidst the mud, an actual comment, and maybe even a link to other info.
When you&#039;ve actually made a comment, and been attacked by someone who has not even made a comment, but strolled onto the blog to fire at me and move on, as you and Jamy have done, you can&#039;t complain about anything.
By the way, hot dog, the website I was referring to that was &quot;not mine&quot;?
Is CondiPundit, Sherlock...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roni: Do me one favor. Before you go off on me the next time, please direct me to one comment you have made on this whole weblog that is on topic, and not devoted entirely to other commenters?<br />
Everyone &#8212; yes, everyone &#8212; on this blog slings all kinds of mud at other commenters. But, in most instances, you can find amidst the mud, an actual comment, and maybe even a link to other info.<br />
When you&#8217;ve actually made a comment, and been attacked by someone who has not even made a comment, but strolled onto the blog to fire at me and move on, as you and Jamy have done, you can&#8217;t complain about anything.<br />
By the way, hot dog, the website I was referring to that was &#8220;not mine&#8221;?<br />
Is CondiPundit, Sherlock&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roni</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31039</link>
		<dc:creator>Roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31039</guid>
		<description>Frank:

&quot;p.s. As I have said many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many, times:
IT IS NOT MY WEBSITE!&quot;

No shit, Sherlock.

Why not establish your own website?  You, drpedro and Dugger?  The 3 Musketeers?  Seriously.  You three promote your opinions and be correct 24/7.  That way, you don&#039;t expend valuable energy throwing insults or arguing with anyone who dares to have an opinion that is different from yours.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank:</p>
<p>&#8220;p.s. As I have said many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many,many, many, times:<br />
IT IS NOT MY WEBSITE!&#8221;</p>
<p>No shit, Sherlock.</p>
<p>Why not establish your own website?  You, drpedro and Dugger?  The 3 Musketeers?  Seriously.  You three promote your opinions and be correct 24/7.  That way, you don&#8217;t expend valuable energy throwing insults or arguing with anyone who dares to have an opinion that is different from yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31038</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31038</guid>
		<description>No, Frank. Duros has it right. It&#039;s &quot;toe the line.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Frank. Duros has it right. It&#8217;s &#8220;toe the line.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31037</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31037</guid>
		<description>Of course you don&#039;t believe me. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/category.php?cat=21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Click here.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you don&#8217;t believe me. <a href="http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/category.php?cat=21" rel="nofollow"> Click here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31036</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31036</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s &quot;tow the line.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s &#8220;tow the line.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31035</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31035</guid>
		<description>It certainly aggravated me that in the runup to the Iraq war, every single media outlet got worked by the GOP noise machine. TV news only *toes* the liberal line when it doesn&#039;t matter. When the chips are down, the GOP spins it every time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly aggravated me that in the runup to the Iraq war, every single media outlet got worked by the GOP noise machine. TV news only *toes* the liberal line when it doesn&#8217;t matter. When the chips are down, the GOP spins it every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31034</link>
		<dc:creator>duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31034</guid>
		<description>toe the liberal line? That&#039;s a joke, right, Frank?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>toe the liberal line? That&#8217;s a joke, right, Frank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31033</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31033</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sensing that it aggravates the bejebus out of you liberals that there is at least one TV news source that doesn&#039;t tow the liberal line.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sensing that it aggravates the bejebus out of you liberals that there is at least one TV news source that doesn&#8217;t tow the liberal line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31032</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31032</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Or former Democratic operative Tim Russert?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or George Will?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Or former Democratic operative Tim Russert?</p></blockquote>
<p>Or George Will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31031</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31031</guid>
		<description>Maybe Fox should just orchestrate the whole press dept at the WH. There could be a logo and a musical intro to match the preferred theme of each press conference. A crawler at the bottom of the screen would provide a stream of propaganda for the duration of the gaggle.


B  U  S  H   --   &quot;D  E  C  I  D  E  S     W  H  A  T  &#039;  S      R  I  G  H  T&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Fox should just orchestrate the whole press dept at the WH. There could be a logo and a musical intro to match the preferred theme of each press conference. A crawler at the bottom of the screen would provide a stream of propaganda for the duration of the gaggle.</p>
<p>B  U  S  H   &#8212;   &#8220;D  E  C  I  D  E  S     W  H  A  T  &#8216;  S      R  I  G  H  T&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31030</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31030</guid>
		<description>They want a press secretary named &quot;Mr. Snow?&quot;

I tell you, a political satirist cannot work under these conditions!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want a press secretary named &#8220;Mr. Snow?&#8221;</p>
<p>I tell you, a political satirist cannot work under these conditions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31029</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31029</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, the White House and the RNC would be throwing away all doubt that Faux is anything but an RNC operation.&lt;/i&gt;
You can explain that, I suppose...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However, the White House and the RNC would be throwing away all doubt that Faux is anything but an RNC operation.</i><br />
You can explain that, I suppose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/18/making-it-official/#comment-31028</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1816#comment-31028</guid>
		<description>If Scottie was going to work for ABC or Fox it wouldn&#039;t be different.  But in this case, Snow is going from Fox to the White House.  Opposite way.

There is nothing wrong with Tony Snow becoming press secretary if that is what comes to pass.  However, the White House and the RNC would be throwing away all doubt that Faux is anything but an RNC operation.

One thing that Bush admin press secretary and Faux newsheads have in common is that both need to lie as a job requirement.  It makes a lot of sense that someone would see that one job prepares you for the other.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Scottie was going to work for ABC or Fox it wouldn&#8217;t be different.  But in this case, Snow is going from Fox to the White House.  Opposite way.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with Tony Snow becoming press secretary if that is what comes to pass.  However, the White House and the RNC would be throwing away all doubt that Faux is anything but an RNC operation.</p>
<p>One thing that Bush admin press secretary and Faux newsheads have in common is that both need to lie as a job requirement.  It makes a lot of sense that someone would see that one job prepares you for the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
