Comments on: Thanks, Jeb! http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: astreeter http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29612 astreeter Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:04:02 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29612 ¡Jeb! ¡Jeb!

]]> By: duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29611 duros62 Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:29 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29611 Dr, Pedro, Minister of Information and Health, the Republic of Asshatistan. Dr, Pedro, Minister of Information and Health, the Republic of Asshatistan.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29610 Quaker in a Basement Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:04:52 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29610 Two words for you, Peed': <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_3664237" rel="nofollow">Subrata Ghoshroy.</a> <blockquote>A senior congressional investigator has accused his agency of covering up scientific fraud among builders of a $26 billion system meant to shield the nation from nuclear attack. </blockquote> Two words for you, Peed’:

Subrata Ghoshroy.

A senior congressional investigator has accused his agency of covering up scientific fraud among builders of a $26 billion system meant to shield the nation from nuclear attack.

]]> By: Bushwacked http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29609 Bushwacked Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:04:41 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29609 And how about your boy harry reid? Stalling the immigration vote out of crass interest in protecting his party from actually having to take a stand on something. What a cheap political hack& I don't blame you guys for trying to change the subject to Harry Reid. I would too if my party's leading candidate for the Senate in Fla was Cruella Deville. And how about your boy harry reid? Stalling the immigration vote out of crass interest in protecting his party from actually having to take a stand on something. What a cheap political hack&

I don’t blame you guys for trying to change the subject to Harry Reid. I would too if my party’s leading candidate for the Senate in Fla was Cruella Deville.

]]> By: BD http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29608 BD Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:04:06 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29608 Pedro was apparently attempting, via inane taunts, to get somebody to interact with him at 9:14 on a Saturday night. Not that I'm surprised that such a boring individual had nothing better to do. Pedro was apparently attempting, via inane taunts, to get somebody to interact with him at 9:14 on a Saturday night.

Not that I’m surprised that such a boring individual had nothing better to do.

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29607 midderpidge Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:04:52 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29607 DrDoper, it is hard to tout these tests as conclusive or even credible since oversight and audit of the entire project was removed from congressional oversight after several failed or rigged tests. What conditions were in place for these tests? Did they fall back to placing GPS tracking beacons into the incoming ballistic missiles yet again? That is where original criticism came from the whole project, when people started pointing at rigged and failed tests, Bush basically removed the entire project from public view and oversight. Defense contractor scientists and military spokesmen would never be considered to be neutral, independent verification fo test results. The closest would be the Japanese scientists who seemed pleased with the results of one joint test, but then again, they are developing their own seperate system and they may have different operational questions they wanted answered than us. DrDoper, it is hard to tout these tests as conclusive or even credible since oversight and audit of the entire project was removed from congressional oversight after several failed or rigged tests. What conditions were in place for these tests? Did they fall back to placing GPS tracking beacons into the incoming ballistic missiles yet again? That is where original criticism came from the whole project, when people started pointing at rigged and failed tests, Bush basically removed the entire project from public view and oversight. Defense contractor scientists and military spokesmen would never be considered to be neutral, independent verification fo test results. The closest would be the Japanese scientists who seemed pleased with the results of one joint test, but then again, they are developing their own seperate system and they may have different operational questions they wanted answered than us.

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29606 Oliver Willis Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:04:01 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29606 Too bad the missile defense system doesn't work. Oh, it works when they rig the tests so that it works (sometimes) but it doesn't work. On some level I would support a missile defense system, especially since it would be a preventative measure. But this one doesn't work, and its a waste of tax dollars. Too bad the missile defense system doesn’t work. Oh, it works when they rig the tests so that it works (sometimes) but it doesn’t work. On some level I would support a missile defense system, especially since it would be a preventative measure. But this one doesn’t work, and its a waste of tax dollars.

]]> By: drpedro http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29605 drpedro Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:04:32 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29605 piddgy? You have gotten awful quiet all of sudden....you ok? All that reading above got ya down? All conflicted that maybe Bush has made america safer for you and your loved ones? piddgy?

You have gotten awful quiet all of sudden….you ok?

All that reading above got ya down?

All conflicted that maybe Bush has made america safer for you and your loved ones?

]]> By: drpedro http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29604 drpedro Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:04:03 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29604 A little proof my little piddgy-widdgy! <a href="http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q4/nr_021014t.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q4/nr_021014t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q4/nr_021014t.html</a></a> <a href="http://freeinternetpress.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6147" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://freeinternetpress.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6147" rel="nofollow">http://freeinternetpress.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6147</a></a> <a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/n12122003_200312121.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/n12122003_200312121.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/n12122003_200312121.html</a></a> <a href="http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/gmd/news/2001/q3/nr_010715s.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/gmd/news/2001/q3/nr_010715s.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/gmd/news/2001/q3/nr_010715s.html</a></a> <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2924" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2924" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2924</a></a> <a href="http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060308-101940-9154r" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060308-101940-9154r" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060308-101940-9154r</a></a> A little proof my little piddgy-widdgy!

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q4/nr_021014t.html
http://freeinternetpress.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6147
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/n12122003_200312121.html
http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/gmd/news/2001/q3/nr_010715s.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2924
http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060308-101940-9154r

]]> By: BD http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29603 BD Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:04:04 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29603 The issue isn't "no defense" versus "some defense," the issue is that it's better to have the money available to work on "real defense," not "maybe defense." Even a broken watch is right twice a day, but that doesn't mean you should spend the price of a new Rolex on it. The issue isn’t “no defense” versus “some defense,” the issue is that it’s better to have the money available to work on “real defense,” not “maybe defense.”

Even a broken watch is right twice a day, but that doesn’t mean you should spend the price of a new Rolex on it.

]]> By: duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29602 duros62 Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:04:55 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29602 Does any of this have anything to do with the topic? See the top of the page. Pedro, I think it is an anagram of your call name. Does any of this have anything to do with the topic? See the top of the page.
Pedro, I think it is an anagram of your call name.

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29601 midderpidge Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:04:35 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29601 No DRDoper, I couldn't find a more recent article from a credible source. No one really want s to write about it since Bush took all oversight and audit away from congress after repeated failed or rigged tests. I just assume DrPedro was a misspelling on your part, I'm just trying to correct it for you. you're welcome. No DRDoper, I couldn’t find a more recent article from a credible source. No one really want s to write about it since Bush took all oversight and audit away from congress after repeated failed or rigged tests.

I just assume DrPedro was a misspelling on your part, I’m just trying to correct it for you. you’re welcome.

]]> By: buma http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29600 buma Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:04:12 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29600 Would his answer be the same if asked about running for president in 2008? Would his answer be the same if asked about running for president in 2008?

]]> By: duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29599 duros62 Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:04:00 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29599 I'd bet if jeb's mom called, he would reconsider it. I’d bet if jeb’s mom called, he would reconsider it.

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29598 Oliver Willis Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:04:59 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29598 Yes, they have a missile defense in place <i>that doesn't work</i>. Massive waste of taxpayer dollars is surely a cause for celebration. Yes, they have a missile defense in place that doesn’t work. Massive waste of taxpayer dollars is surely a cause for celebration.

]]> By: drpedro http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29597 drpedro Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:04:44 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29597 Sorry Ollie, I forgot you're a rocket scientist...oh, wait, no you're not! I'm sorry, apparently people who ARE rocket scientists think it does. You see, that phrase "all men are created equal" doesn't mean that everyones OPINION is treated equally, eh? And how about your boy harry reid? Stalling the immigration vote out of crass interest in protecting his party from actually having to take a stand on something. What a cheap political hack... "In private as well as public, Reid and Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., who heads the party's campaign effort, said they did not want to expose rank-and-file Democrats to votes that would force them to choose between border security and immigrant rights, only to wind up with legislation that would be eviscerated in future negotiations with the House, which has passed a bill limited to boosting border security." What brave, big leaders the democrats have....I'll take Dr Frist any day... Sorry Ollie, I forgot you’re a rocket scientist…oh, wait, no you’re not!

I’m sorry, apparently people who ARE rocket scientists think it does. You see, that phrase “all men are created equal” doesn’t mean that everyones OPINION is treated equally, eh?

And how about your boy harry reid? Stalling the immigration vote out of crass interest in protecting his party from actually having to take a stand on something. What a cheap political hack…

“In private as well as public, Reid and Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., who heads the party’s campaign effort, said they did not want to expose rank-and-file Democrats to votes that would force them to choose between border security and immigrant rights, only to wind up with legislation that would be eviscerated in future negotiations with the House, which has passed a bill limited to boosting border security.”

What brave, big leaders the democrats have….I’ll take Dr Frist any day…

]]> By: drpedro http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29596 drpedro Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:04:08 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29596 Pidgy, maybe you could find a more CURRENT source. And what is "DrDoper" supposed to mean? Is it really supposed to say "DrDopey" which would sort of fit with puerile mindset around here Or is it a drug reference, like I "dope"people up. Inquiring minds want to know...cause otherwise it is just kinda silly... Pidgy, maybe you could find a more CURRENT source.

And what is “DrDoper” supposed to mean?

Is it really supposed to say “DrDopey” which would sort of fit with puerile mindset around here

Or is it a drug reference, like I “dope”people up.

Inquiring minds want to know…cause otherwise it is just kinda silly…

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29595 midderpidge Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:04:52 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29595 It doesn't work, DrDoper. Try a more reputable <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2097087" rel="nofollow">source</a>. It doesn’t work, DrDoper.

Try a more reputable source.

]]> By: BD http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29594 BD Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:04:58 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29594 <i>"The system is still aimed primarily at development and testing, but the capability does exist." However, Flory adds, "Ballistic missile defenses are not as capable today as they will be in the future. The system in place is an initial capability."</i> Yeah, this inspires confidence in me and fear in our enemies. “The system is still aimed primarily at development and testing, but the capability does exist.”

However, Flory adds, “Ballistic missile defenses are not as capable today as they will be in the future. The system in place is an initial capability.”

Yeah, this inspires confidence in me and fear in our enemies.

]]> By: drpedro http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/04/08/thanks-jeb/#comment-29593 drpedro Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:04:54 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1763#comment-29593 Sorry for hijacking the thread Ollie, I'll shut up now.... Sorry for hijacking the thread Ollie,

I’ll shut up now….

]]>