Comments on: They Were For It, Before They Were… http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:02:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26620 factcheck Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:03:59 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26620 Wow, I guess Rush and Sean didn't discuss the bill. I wonder why? Maybe they were just so excited about St. Patricks Day that they forgot. Wow, I guess Rush and Sean didn’t discuss the bill. I wonder why? Maybe they were just so excited about St. Patricks Day that they forgot.

]]> By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26619 factcheck Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:03:28 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26619 It won't be long now, Frame, Rush's show just started. Or Rush will ignore it, like Hannity does when it is something that can't be spun. Maybe it was the Republican Congress' evil twin that voted against port security and for Al Queda? It won’t be long now, Frame, Rush’s show just started. Or Rush will ignore it, like Hannity does when it is something that can’t be spun.

Maybe it was the Republican Congress’ evil twin that voted against port security and for Al Queda?

]]> By: frameone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26618 frameone Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:03:15 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26618 Where's DuggerPedro and HedleyFrank? Or FarrisStick? Come on guys, what's the explanation? Where’s DuggerPedro and HedleyFrank? Or FarrisStick? Come on guys, what’s the explanation?

]]> By: duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26617 duros62 Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:03:50 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26617 <a href="http://www.xoverboard.com/deadkittensurvey/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.xoverboard.com/deadkittensurvey/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xoverboard.com/deadkittensurvey/</a></a> http://www.xoverboard.com/deadkittensurvey/

]]> By: duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26616 duros62 Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:03:41 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26616 Unless there was a rider in the bill authorizing the President power to kill kittens with a hammer, I don't understand why they would vote against it. Maybe simply because a Democrat (shudder, wretch) introduced it? I seriously think they are trying to kill us all. Unless there was a rider in the bill authorizing the President power to kill kittens with a hammer, I don’t understand why they would vote against it.
Maybe simply because a Democrat (shudder, wretch) introduced it?
I seriously think they are trying to kill us all.

]]> By: Oliver Willis » Someone Explain This To Me http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26615 Oliver Willis » Someone Explain This To Me Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:03:11 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26615 [...] #8217;re dealing with jackals without any sort of decorum here. In the House, we now have almost the entire House Republican caucus on record as voting against p [...] [...] #8217;re dealing with jackals without any sort of decorum here. In the House, we now have almost the entire House Republican caucus on record as voting against p [...]

]]> By: Common Sense Political Thought http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26614 Common Sense Political Thought Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:03:44 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26614 <strong>Why?</strong> Why would the Republicans who were so opposed to the sale of the port management company to Dubai Ports World, claiming that it was an unacceptable security risk, vote against the Sabo Amendment, to provide increased funding for port security? The Sa... Why?

Why would the Republicans who were so opposed to the sale of the port management company to Dubai Ports World, claiming that it was an unacceptable security risk, vote against the Sabo Amendment, to provide increased funding for port security?
The Sa…

]]> By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26613 factcheck Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:03:20 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26613 Semant- they haven't been happy with the Gazillions they've stolen from the gub'ment so far, what makes you so sure that another gazillion will make them go away? Fatherland- I mean Homeland Security isn't about security. It's a way to funnel more money into defense contractors. Semant- they haven’t been happy with the Gazillions they’ve stolen from the gub’ment so far, what makes you so sure that another gazillion will make them go away?

Fatherland- I mean Homeland Security isn’t about security. It’s a way to funnel more money into defense contractors.

]]> By: buma http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26612 buma Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:03:55 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26612 From the link-- "Meanwhile, the Bush budget  which most of the members who voted against this bill will likely support  contains an increase of $1.7 billion for missile defense, a program that doesn t even work." Bush is just sacrificing sanity for consistency. Wasn't that somebody's definition of 'moonbat'? From the link–
“Meanwhile, the Bush budget  which most of the members who voted against this bill will likely support  contains an increase of $1.7 billion for missile defense, a program that doesn t even work.”

Bush is just sacrificing sanity for consistency. Wasn’t that somebody’s definition of ‘moonbat’?

]]> By: Semanticleo http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26611 Semanticleo Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:03:40 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26611 Why do they hate America? Why do they hate America?

]]> By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26610 factcheck Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:03:38 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26610 They have to have the machines rigged. They really want to be on record against port security, after the Dubai controversy? They have to have the machines rigged. They really want to be on record against port security, after the Dubai controversy?

]]> By: Semanticleo http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/03/16/they-were-for-it-before-they-were/#comment-26609 Semanticleo Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:03:00 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1541#comment-26609 Can't we make them happy by giving Diebold ann Halliburton another Gazillion for the monopoly on the damn machines? Then can we start some Homeland Security that actually protects the homeland? Can’t we make them happy by giving Diebold ann Halliburton
another Gazillion for the monopoly on the damn machines?

Then can we start some Homeland Security that actually
protects the homeland?

]]>