http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/17/s-471/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:28:38 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/17/s-471/#comment-23709 Oliver Willis » Democrats: Run As Pro-Stem Cell Research Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:03:05 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1418#comment-23709 [...] gree with. Every Democratic senate candidate should be running on the fact that Bill Frist is not allowing an up or down vote on stem cell research, and that the more Dems in the Senate, the [...] [...] gree with. Every Democratic senate candidate should be running on the fact that Bill Frist is not allowing an up or down vote on stem cell research, and that the more Dems in the Senate, the [...]

]]> http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/17/s-471/#comment-23708 appletree » Blog Archive » Stem Cell Research Blocked Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:02:41 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1418#comment-23708 [...] rts that S. 471, a bill that would allow embryonic stem cell research, has passed the House of Representatives, but appears bottlenecked in the Senate.  Representative Benja [...] [...] rts that S. 471, a bill that would allow embryonic stem cell research, has passed the House of Representatives, but appears bottlenecked in the Senate.  Representative Benja [...]

]]> http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/17/s-471/#comment-23707 Frank_D Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:02:38 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1418#comment-23707 <i>(2) Prior to the consideration of embryo donation and through consultation with the individuals seeking fertility treatment, it was determined that the embryos would never be implanted in a woman and would otherwise be discarded.</i> If you don't see a problem with Para 2, then you don't understand why the Republicans voted against it. I'm glad, and you need to go check it out. ` (2) Prior to the consideration of embryo donation and through consultation with the individuals seeking fertility treatment, it was determined that the embryos would never be implanted in a woman and would otherwise be discarded.
If you don’t see a problem with Para 2, then you don’t understand why the Republicans voted against it.
I’m glad, and you need to go check it out.
`

]]> http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/17/s-471/#comment-23706 midderpidge Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:02:00 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1418#comment-23706 To clarify, if elected, clearly Michael Steel would vote on this pending legislation. Every vote is important in Congress and Michael Steele would support that every bill coming to the floor should be voted on by members of congress. Michael Steele supports the existence of this bill, and acknowledges it. Furthermore if elected, Michael Steele can say that he will positively vote on this bill. To clarify, if elected, clearly Michael Steel would vote on this pending legislation. Every vote is important in Congress and Michael Steele would support that every bill coming to the floor should be voted on by members of congress. Michael Steele supports the existence of this bill, and acknowledges it. Furthermore if elected, Michael Steele can say that he will positively vote on this bill.

]]>