Comments on: Is Rush On The Stuff Again?

By: bozzy

bozzy — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:03:01 +0000

The headline reminds me of that cheesy movie “The Stuff”…

“you can never get enough, of the stuff!”

By: The Sagelaw Blog » Blog Archive » Rush tries to play the race card . . . and fails.

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:02:49 +0000

[...] ere s a racial component here, too. The problem? Brown is white. Nice one Rush! Explore posts in the same categories: US Politics [...]

By: StealthBadger.net » Blog Archive » Lies, Damned Lies, and Sophistry

StealthBadger.net » Blog Archive » Lies, Damned Lies, and Sophistry — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:02:22 +0000

[...] makes the charge that the Democratic party is silent on his race an interesting one& because Mr. Brown isn t black. I leave the reader in pe [...]

By: The Daily Background

The Daily Background — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:02:31 +0000

Brown is Black. But not really.

Uh, maybe somebody in the party has figured this out. And don t forget Sherrod Brown is black. There s a racial component here, too. Uh, and now the newspaper that I m reading all this from is The New York Times, and they, of course, don t…

By: mjb

mjb — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:02:26 +0000

You should be banned for making shit up repeatedly.

By: mjb

mjb — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:02:13 +0000

“when YOU referred to it as black justice ”
Pedro, please tell me where I referred to anything as “black justice”. Is this just you being sloppy or are you lying again? Either way, you’ll probably just pretend it didn’t happen just like every other time you’ve lied. Are you drunk?

By: appletree » Blog Archive » Limbaugh is an idiot. But you knew that already.

appletree » Blog Archive » Limbaugh is an idiot. But you knew that already. — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:02:54 +0000

[...] . Limbaugh is an idiot. But you knew that already. Oliver Willis has a hilarious audio clip of Rush, trying to do his race-baitin [...]

By: drpedro

drpedro — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:02:45 +0000

mjb says…”Justice without modifiers is a meaningless”

then mjb says…. ” if you want to call it a racial modifier to spin it to your liking”

so, YOU state you need a modifier but you argue with calling it a “racial”modifier when YOU referred to it as “black justice”?

Anyone else here see why it is hard to have a discussion with these racist, leftist baboons? Their arguments aren’t even internally consistent…

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:02:08 +0000

Misinformed likely& ..

When it comes to Limbaugh, that’s a given. However, that wouldn’t explain his decision to make a big deal about the supposed color of the candidate replacing Hackett. So we’re back to:

Stoned? Or racist?

By: mjb

mjb — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:02:39 +0000

pedro, I get exactly what you’re saying. You’re going to have to define “Truth” now. “Truth” only exists as far as our ability to comprehend it. Look into Relativity Theory. Your ability to comprehend “Truth” doesn’t extend beyond some abstract idea which you can’t define and which can be molded to suit your purposes from issue to issue. Everything is relative, but that sir is relativistic in a very distructive way. The relativism which thinking people (people not wedded to a bullshit knowitall text) is one where we understand that the social rules we work with come from years of trial and error and these rules vary from one era to another, depending upon which ends any society values at any particular time. We understand these rules are very fallible, absolutists do not, regardless of how many times their rules are shown to be inadequate. But absolutists usually just ignore those and pretend it doesn’t destroy their whole idea of absolutism.
And if you want to call it a racial modifier to spin it to your liking, fine, but the fact remains that justice means different things to different people. To people suffering from racial discrimination it may mean righting that wrong. To you people it means not taking into account all the facts, history or any concept of the autonomy of the victim and the seriousness with which their different worldview should be taken.

By: drpedro

drpedro — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:02:03 +0000

This is going to be hard for you mjb, but take a minute to try to wrap your shriveled cortex around it….

It is Truth, in the abstract.

It is the idea that there is a “truth” that is unrelated to politics, situation, time of day. A “truth” as immutable as “E=mc2″……

I don’t think there is a “black” truth or a “swiss” truth, just as there aren’t different forms of Justice.

It is you lefties, you believers in the idea that “all animals are equal, just some are more equal than others” that think that truth and justice require some sort of racial modifier.

By: mjb

mjb — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:02:12 +0000

Pedro, you’re just trying to be ironical now. High comedy. For someone who has blatantly lied on many a thread here, to claim to hold the high ground, just priceless. You sir, are a king of satire. Brava.

But seriously, what facts or truth might you be referring to?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:02:41 +0000

So, “Doc.” What do you think caused Rush to make a mistake like that?

Stoned or racist?

By: croakerhead

croakerhead — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:02:15 +0000

Awww come on people, cut the big guy some slack. It is an easy error to make. Heck, a lot of people with the name Brown are black–e.g. James Brown…

Just think of the confusion poor Rush must have had to deal with during his brief ESPN gig–Reggie White…

On a side note–does anyone remember when Rush first was syndicated and he did “Caller Abortions”? He dropped that pretty quick when people started to think of him as a pundit.

By: drpedro

drpedro — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:02:11 +0000

Misinformed likely…..

By: drpedro

drpedro — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:02:31 +0000

mjb here is the defination of “Justice”:

conformity to truth, fact, or reason : CORRECTNESS

I think you actually DO, like you lefty collegues believe that “truth” and “fact” requires a modifier.

I think most reasonable human beings would argue that “truth” and “fact” require no modifier at all.

By: drpedro

drpedro — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:02:43 +0000

You make a good point mjb. “His concern was for racial justice”……
That just about sums up the democrats.

Unfortunately, the republicans concern is for JUSTICE, not racial, not sexual, simply…JUSTICE…with no modifiers attached.

The unfortunate truth is that the lefties don’t want JUSTICE, they want modified justice.

And olllie, for god sakes read the article before commenting on it….

By: silas216

silas216 — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:02:31 +0000

Ummm, Pedro …

I know sometimes the ADD kicks in, but please try to stay on topic here.

By: mjb

mjb — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:02:25 +0000

Justice without modifiers is a meaningless word. How do you define justice if not for some specific end. Your idea of justice is a very specific, modified one, just a very different one than me, even if you can’t articulate it beyond the feeling it gives you to proclaim JUSTICE.

By: mjb

mjb — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:02:01 +0000

Hey RNC Plant Pedro (could your moniker be any more uninspired? It’s as if some keyboard komando thought to himself “what do I need to name myself to be taken seriously and to deflect as much criticism as possible? I’ll throw in a little higher education and a little ethnicity, and presto, a great character whom no one could call stupid or racially insensitive.” Oh yeah, that’s probably what actually happened.)
That state assemblyman sure did act terribly, but, you know, his overriding concern was racial justice. As insensitive as he looked, and I’m not apologizing for his sloppiness, he had a specific goal which was rendered moot once someone did his homework for him. Rush, on the otherhand, finds ways to inject skin color (even when he’s just guessing at someone’s color) merely to conjure negative associations in his listeners, to insure that the first association a listener has with any given black democrat he’s talking is that that black democrat is getting a free ride because of his/her skin color. That’s a little different, don’t you think doc?