<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:34:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22921</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your wild insinuations about Kennedy are unsupported by the facts&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I haven&#039;t said one word about Kennedy. Your confusion with the facts is very consistent. Thank you for demonstrating it yet again.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your wild insinuations about Kennedy are unsupported by the facts</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t said one word about Kennedy. Your confusion with the facts is very consistent. Thank you for demonstrating it yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22920</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22920</guid>
		<description>Snicker all you like, Putsch fellator.

Your wild insinuations about Kennedy are unsupported by the facts, the police reports, the trial, etc.  All of the lies you spout won&#039;t change that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snicker all you like, Putsch fellator.</p>
<p>Your wild insinuations about Kennedy are unsupported by the facts, the police reports, the trial, etc.  All of the lies you spout won&#8217;t change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22919</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22919</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Next time you have a fender-bender tell the police cruiser that arrives that now isn t a convenient time for you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wow. Did I miss the point in which you stopped supporting our constitutional rights?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Next time you have a fender-bender tell the police cruiser that arrives that now isn t a convenient time for you.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Did I miss the point in which you stopped supporting our constitutional rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22918</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22918</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How about when the Secret Service is already on the scene?&lt;/i&gt;

You mean the same Secret Service that bails the Bush girls&#039; boyfriends out of jail?  Or the same Secret Service that ejects folks from Bush campaign appearances for wearing the wrong T-shirt?

&lt;i&gt;It happens all the time to people who know their rights. &lt;/i&gt;

Sure.  Next time you have a fender-bender--tell the police cruiser that arrives that now isn&#039;t a convenient time for you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How about when the Secret Service is already on the scene?</i></p>
<p>You mean the same Secret Service that bails the Bush girls&#8217; boyfriends out of jail?  Or the same Secret Service that ejects folks from Bush campaign appearances for wearing the wrong T-shirt?</p>
<p><i>It happens all the time to people who know their rights. </i></p>
<p>Sure.  Next time you have a fender-bender&#8211;tell the police cruiser that arrives that now isn&#8217;t a convenient time for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22917</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22917</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I make no accusations. I merely voice some strong suspicions&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Snicker.
Of course, those suspicions are contradicted by the fact that the police were on the scene and observed Laura Welch and her passenger. I guess they never saw a drunk teenager before and couldn&#039;t figure out that alcohol or drugs were involved. Ditto for the hospital staff that treated Laura and her passenger.
And, wow, Laura Welch sure had good aim to purposely hit that the car travelling at 50 mph in a perpendicular path at night...not to mention her ability to recognize the car/driver...at 50 mph...at night...while intoxicated...
Especially considering that he didn&#039;t have the same ability to notice her and realize that she wasn&#039;t slowing down to stop...because she would&#039;ve had to begin slowing down from 50+ mph a little bit before she got to the intersection, right?
Yeah, your &quot;strong [non-accusatory] suspicions&quot; are not ridiculous at all. I&#039;ve been such a fool.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I make no accusations. I merely voice some strong suspicions</p></blockquote>
<p>Snicker.<br />
Of course, those suspicions are contradicted by the fact that the police were on the scene and observed Laura Welch and her passenger. I guess they never saw a drunk teenager before and couldn&#8217;t figure out that alcohol or drugs were involved. Ditto for the hospital staff that treated Laura and her passenger.<br />
And, wow, Laura Welch sure had good aim to purposely hit that the car travelling at 50 mph in a perpendicular path at night&#8230;not to mention her ability to recognize the car/driver&#8230;at 50 mph&#8230;at night&#8230;while intoxicated&#8230;<br />
Especially considering that he didn&#8217;t have the same ability to notice her and realize that she wasn&#8217;t slowing down to stop&#8230;because she would&#8217;ve had to begin slowing down from 50+ mph a little bit before she got to the intersection, right?<br />
Yeah, your &#8220;strong [non-accusatory] suspicions&#8221; are not ridiculous at all. I&#8217;ve been such a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22916</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22916</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I m not a cop but since when do police take reports over the telephone about a shooting?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How about when the Secret Service is already on the scene?
&lt;blockquote&gt;Since when do the parties involved in a shooting get to dictate when the police can interview them?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It happens all the time to people who know their rights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I m not a cop but since when do police take reports over the telephone about a shooting?</p></blockquote>
<p>How about when the Secret Service is already on the scene?</p>
<blockquote><p>Since when do the parties involved in a shooting get to dictate when the police can interview them?</p></blockquote>
<p>It happens all the time to people who know their rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22915</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22915</guid>
		<description>If the local sheriff knows about the shooting within an hour and &quot;indicates he would send deputies the next morning around 8,&quot; then he is in the loop. Some people want there to be a conspiracy soooooo badly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the local sheriff knows about the shooting within an hour and &#8220;indicates he would send deputies the next morning around 8,&#8221; then he is in the loop. Some people want there to be a conspiracy soooooo badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22914</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22914</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You made the following unsubstantiated accusations:
1) Laura Welch was driving under the influence of either alcohol or some other drug
2) Laura Welch was out for vengeance
3) There was a police coverup even though the boy killed was one of the most popular kids in town&lt;/i&gt;

Reading comprehension for Repugnicant trash:

&lt;i&gt;The &lt;b&gt;suspicion, which I strongly share&lt;/b&gt;, is that Pickles was drunk or under the influence of an illegal substance (not unheard of), and in motion to -err- play  vengeance is mine  (not unheard of) and was waiting for an opportunity to present itself.&lt;/i&gt;

I make no accusations.  I merely voice some strong suspicions (similar to the strong suspicions mentioned ad nauseum for over forty years now, and almost the same as the suspicions made about Kennedy in an earlier comment) regarding the state and motives of young Pickles when she &lt;b&gt;killed a fellow classmate and former boyfriend&lt;/b&gt;.  I see no reason why my suspicions are any more idiotic than those spewed by lying hypocrites like the BFS squad around here regarding Kennedy&#039;s accident.

I also made no claim that Kennedy intentionally drove off that bridge.  I challenged someone else&#039;s insinuation that the Kennedy accident occurred the way it was described in an earlier comment by &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Jay C&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, when he commented that there is a difference between an accident (which I take to be an inference to Cheney&#039;s shooting of a fellow hunter) and an intentional act (which I take to be an inference to Kennedy&#039;s accident, and specifically, that he intentionally caused his passenger at the time to die by intentionally driving off that bridge).

I merely make a comparison between the unsubstantiated insinuations about Kennedy&#039;s accident, and the unsubstantiated insinuations about Laura Welch&#039;s.  Funny how the Reich wing around here claims that one is gospel (even after a trial etc. which officially debunked said claims), and the other is complete fabrication.  Almost as though you&#039;re willing to consider the facts, as long as they mesh with your world view.

I stand corrected about the daylight (or lack thereof) at the time of Pickles&#039; mishap.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You made the following unsubstantiated accusations:<br />
1) Laura Welch was driving under the influence of either alcohol or some other drug<br />
2) Laura Welch was out for vengeance<br />
3) There was a police coverup even though the boy killed was one of the most popular kids in town</i></p>
<p>Reading comprehension for Repugnicant trash:</p>
<p><i>The <b>suspicion, which I strongly share</b>, is that Pickles was drunk or under the influence of an illegal substance (not unheard of), and in motion to -err- play  vengeance is mine  (not unheard of) and was waiting for an opportunity to present itself.</i></p>
<p>I make no accusations.  I merely voice some strong suspicions (similar to the strong suspicions mentioned ad nauseum for over forty years now, and almost the same as the suspicions made about Kennedy in an earlier comment) regarding the state and motives of young Pickles when she <b>killed a fellow classmate and former boyfriend</b>.  I see no reason why my suspicions are any more idiotic than those spewed by lying hypocrites like the BFS squad around here regarding Kennedy&#8217;s accident.</p>
<p>I also made no claim that Kennedy intentionally drove off that bridge.  I challenged someone else&#8217;s insinuation that the Kennedy accident occurred the way it was described in an earlier comment by <b><i>Jay C</i></b>, when he commented that there is a difference between an accident (which I take to be an inference to Cheney&#8217;s shooting of a fellow hunter) and an intentional act (which I take to be an inference to Kennedy&#8217;s accident, and specifically, that he intentionally caused his passenger at the time to die by intentionally driving off that bridge).</p>
<p>I merely make a comparison between the unsubstantiated insinuations about Kennedy&#8217;s accident, and the unsubstantiated insinuations about Laura Welch&#8217;s.  Funny how the Reich wing around here claims that one is gospel (even after a trial etc. which officially debunked said claims), and the other is complete fabrication.  Almost as though you&#8217;re willing to consider the facts, as long as they mesh with your world view.</p>
<p>I stand corrected about the daylight (or lack thereof) at the time of Pickles&#8217; mishap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22913</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22913</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like they were notified between 7:50 and 8:00 PM, and made arrangements to meet with the Sheriff and/or deputies the following morning.  Hardly sounds like they were out of the loop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like they were notified between 7:50 and 8:00 PM, and made arrangements to meet with the Sheriff and/or deputies the following morning.  Hardly sounds like they were out of the loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22912</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22912</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The media may have been out of the loop for nearly 20 hours, but why do you state that the local authorities were not involved for 20 hours&lt;/i&gt;

Because they weren&#039;t.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/14/AR2006021400990.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WaPo&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;7:50-8 p.m.: The Secret Service notifi es Kenedy County Sheriff Ramon Salinas III of the accident. Salinas indicates he would send deputies the next morning around 8.

Saturday evening: Members of the hunting party return to the Armstrong Ranch, where they make calls to check on Whittington s conditiion and then have dinner. According to Katharine Armstrong, no one suggested publicly releasing the news. At least one sheriff s deputy shows up at the ranch but is turned away. Deputies are not aware of the earlier conversation between the Secret Service and the sheriff.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The media may have been out of the loop for nearly 20 hours, but why do you state that the local authorities were not involved for 20 hours</i></p>
<p>Because they weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/14/AR2006021400990.html" rel="nofollow">WaPo</a></p>
<blockquote><p>7:50-8 p.m.: The Secret Service notifi es Kenedy County Sheriff Ramon Salinas III of the accident. Salinas indicates he would send deputies the next morning around 8.</p>
<p>Saturday evening: Members of the hunting party return to the Armstrong Ranch, where they make calls to check on Whittington s conditiion and then have dinner. According to Katharine Armstrong, no one suggested publicly releasing the news. At least one sheriff s deputy shows up at the ranch but is turned away. Deputies are not aware of the earlier conversation between the Secret Service and the sheriff.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22911</guid>
		<description>JD:  Time to think.

You have a wounding of a man in what is said to be an accident.  The wounding was serious enough to warrant the man being air-lifted to a hospital.

Further, you know the police weren&#039;t notified until several hours after the incident.

I&#039;m not a cop but since when do police take reports over the telephone about a shooting?  Since when do the parties involved in a shooting get to dictate when the police can interview them?

I have investigated accidents and rule one is to get to the scene as fast as possible and interview witnesses as soon as possible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD:  Time to think.</p>
<p>You have a wounding of a man in what is said to be an accident.  The wounding was serious enough to warrant the man being air-lifted to a hospital.</p>
<p>Further, you know the police weren&#8217;t notified until several hours after the incident.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a cop but since when do police take reports over the telephone about a shooting?  Since when do the parties involved in a shooting get to dictate when the police can interview them?</p>
<p>I have investigated accidents and rule one is to get to the scene as fast as possible and interview witnesses as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22910</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22910</guid>
		<description>Tommy : Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to drive after drinking?  Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to not rescue her?  Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to not notify the authorities?

I have no doubt that driving off of the bridge was an accident.

I would continue, but it appears that JWG has already bitch slapped you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy : Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to drive after drinking?  Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to not rescue her?  Did he, or did he not, commit an intentional act when he chose to not notify the authorities?</p>
<p>I have no doubt that driving off of the bridge was an accident.</p>
<p>I would continue, but it appears that JWG has already bitch slapped you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22909</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22909</guid>
		<description>Intentionally ran off the bridge Tom. See the difference.  He could have intentionally drove drunk (a crime), intentionally left the scene of an accident (a crime), left a young woman to slowly suffocate/drown (a horrible crime), but there is no reason to suppose he was (trying to commit suicide or whatever)  by running off the bridge - as you claimed.
I doubt it was a moral murder but the justice system has already let him get away, in essence, scot free (another in my long line of anti-Scottish slurs).

The significance.  Well we are talking about a hunting accident with  a current powerful political leader.  The political left is charging some sort of malfeasnace with the timing of the report.  Kennedy went to bed and his accident, dead girl and all, went 8 hours unreported.  So, the question are accidents and their details important only when they happen to right wing politicianns and is there any diffrence in rushing someone to the hospital to see them get treated and leaving a girl trapped underwater and going to bed in a comfy hotel.  Are we supposed to believe there is anything other than cheap aprtisan politics behind this incident.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intentionally ran off the bridge Tom. See the difference.  He could have intentionally drove drunk (a crime), intentionally left the scene of an accident (a crime), left a young woman to slowly suffocate/drown (a horrible crime), but there is no reason to suppose he was (trying to commit suicide or whatever)  by running off the bridge &#8211; as you claimed.<br />
I doubt it was a moral murder but the justice system has already let him get away, in essence, scot free (another in my long line of anti-Scottish slurs).</p>
<p>The significance.  Well we are talking about a hunting accident with  a current powerful political leader.  The political left is charging some sort of malfeasnace with the timing of the report.  Kennedy went to bed and his accident, dead girl and all, went 8 hours unreported.  So, the question are accidents and their details important only when they happen to right wing politicianns and is there any diffrence in rushing someone to the hospital to see them get treated and leaving a girl trapped underwater and going to bed in a comfy hotel.  Are we supposed to believe there is anything other than cheap aprtisan politics behind this incident.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22908</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22908</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When have you ever let facts even enter your traitourous melon?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You obviously don&#039;t read many of my comments. I&#039;m one of the only ones around here who regularly links to actual facts.

You made the following unsubstantiated accusations:
1) Laura Welch was driving under the influence of either alcohol or some other drug
2) Laura Welch was out for vengeance
3) There was a police coverup even though the boy killed was one of the most popular kids in town

I eagerly await any evidence you might use to support your claims.

Otherwise, I stand by my claim that  &quot;your analysis is idiotic.&quot;

So how about it? Or are you all mouth and no facts?
&lt;blockquote&gt;Drive on any roads with stop signs in broad daylight&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It was 8 pm in November...hardly &quot;broad daylight.&quot;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I haven t seen any police reports on the matter either. They saem to have been flushed down the memory hole. Funny, that&amp; &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/e1698.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wrong again&lt;/a&gt;. The AP had access to the report before the 2000 election. Don&#039;t let facts get in your way, though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When have you ever let facts even enter your traitourous melon?</p></blockquote>
<p>You obviously don&#8217;t read many of my comments. I&#8217;m one of the only ones around here who regularly links to actual facts.</p>
<p>You made the following unsubstantiated accusations:<br />
1) Laura Welch was driving under the influence of either alcohol or some other drug<br />
2) Laura Welch was out for vengeance<br />
3) There was a police coverup even though the boy killed was one of the most popular kids in town</p>
<p>I eagerly await any evidence you might use to support your claims.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I stand by my claim that  &#8220;your analysis is idiotic.&#8221;</p>
<p>So how about it? Or are you all mouth and no facts?</p>
<blockquote><p>Drive on any roads with stop signs in broad daylight</p></blockquote>
<p>It was 8 pm in November&#8230;hardly &#8220;broad daylight.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>I haven t seen any police reports on the matter either. They saem to have been flushed down the memory hole. Funny, that&#038; </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/e1698.htm" rel="nofollow">Wrong again</a>. The AP had access to the report before the 2000 election. Don&#8217;t let facts get in your way, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22907</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22907</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Laura_Bush_police_report.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;police report&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Laura_Bush_police_report.jpg" rel="nofollow">police report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (: Tom :)</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22906</link>
		<dc:creator>(: Tom :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22906</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You erroneously claim that other posters claimed Kennedy intentionally ran off Dike bridge.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt; JD Says:

February 13th, 2006 at 8:22 pm
Jay C - Apparently the distinction between an accident and &lt;b&gt;an intentional act&lt;/b&gt; is completely lost on these people.&lt;/i&gt;

What was that you were saying about no one making the claim that what Kennedy did ewas intentional again?

&lt;i&gt; JWG Says:

February 14th, 2006 at 2:22 pm
Tom, your analysis is idiotic and unsupported by the police investigation. But don t let facts get in the way.&lt;/i&gt;

What police investigation?  According to what I have read, there was no investigation to speak of - just a whitewashing of the &quot;incident&quot;.  I haven&#039;t seen any police reports on the matter either.  They saem to have been flushed down the memory hole.  Funny, that...

Oh, and by the way: thanks very much for that insightful analysis, and your thorough debunking of any of the points I made earlier.  Having someone with BFS say &lt;i&gt;But don t let facts get in the way&lt;/i&gt; is such a meaningful and honest assessment of the situation.  When have you ever let facts even enter your traitourous melon?

&lt;i&gt; Dugger Says:

February 14th, 2006 at 2:55 pm

The big picture was painted for you and you revert back to young Laura Bush. Does this mean you surrender on currently active and powerful US Senator Ted Kennedy?

If it will help, I will acknowledge that there have probably been miscarriages of justice wherein Republicans have benefitted. I know a little about Kennedy because he is a very important Gov figure. Laura Bush decides where the White Hosue china is placed.

Dugger&lt;/i&gt;

What big picture is this?  That Kennedy should have been in prison for murdering someone forty years ago?  And painted by whom?  A bunch of RNC-bots parroting GOP talking points?  That sure gives me confidence in the artist, as well as the quality of the painting...

Try again, Putsch fellators...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You erroneously claim that other posters claimed Kennedy intentionally ran off Dike bridge.</i></p>
<p><i> JD Says:</p>
<p>February 13th, 2006 at 8:22 pm<br />
Jay C &#8211; Apparently the distinction between an accident and <b>an intentional act</b> is completely lost on these people.</i></p>
<p>What was that you were saying about no one making the claim that what Kennedy did ewas intentional again?</p>
<p><i> JWG Says:</p>
<p>February 14th, 2006 at 2:22 pm<br />
Tom, your analysis is idiotic and unsupported by the police investigation. But don t let facts get in the way.</i></p>
<p>What police investigation?  According to what I have read, there was no investigation to speak of &#8211; just a whitewashing of the &#8220;incident&#8221;.  I haven&#8217;t seen any police reports on the matter either.  They saem to have been flushed down the memory hole.  Funny, that&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way: thanks very much for that insightful analysis, and your thorough debunking of any of the points I made earlier.  Having someone with BFS say <i>But don t let facts get in the way</i> is such a meaningful and honest assessment of the situation.  When have you ever let facts even enter your traitourous melon?</p>
<p><i> Dugger Says:</p>
<p>February 14th, 2006 at 2:55 pm</p>
<p>The big picture was painted for you and you revert back to young Laura Bush. Does this mean you surrender on currently active and powerful US Senator Ted Kennedy?</p>
<p>If it will help, I will acknowledge that there have probably been miscarriages of justice wherein Republicans have benefitted. I know a little about Kennedy because he is a very important Gov figure. Laura Bush decides where the White Hosue china is placed.</p>
<p>Dugger</i></p>
<p>What big picture is this?  That Kennedy should have been in prison for murdering someone forty years ago?  And painted by whom?  A bunch of RNC-bots parroting GOP talking points?  That sure gives me confidence in the artist, as well as the quality of the painting&#8230;</p>
<p>Try again, Putsch fellators&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22905</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22905</guid>
		<description>Great. Now my comments must await moderation if I only provide one link. When have I ever linked to anything other than a mainstream news source?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Now my comments must await moderation if I only provide one link. When have I ever linked to anything other than a mainstream news source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22904</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22904</guid>
		<description>yes, Tom.  You erroneously claim that other posters claimed Kennedy intentionally  ran off Dike bridge.  The big picture was painted for you and you revert back to young Laura Bush.  Does this mean you surrender on currently active and powerful US Senator Ted Kennedy?

If it will help, I will acknowledge that there have probably been miscarriages of justice wherein Republicans have benefitted.  I know a little about Kennedy because he is a very important Gov figure.  Laura Bush decides where the White Hosue china is placed.


Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, Tom.  You erroneously claim that other posters claimed Kennedy intentionally  ran off Dike bridge.  The big picture was painted for you and you revert back to young Laura Bush.  Does this mean you surrender on currently active and powerful US Senator Ted Kennedy?</p>
<p>If it will help, I will acknowledge that there have probably been miscarriages of justice wherein Republicans have benefitted.  I know a little about Kennedy because he is a very important Gov figure.  Laura Bush decides where the White Hosue china is placed.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22903</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22903</guid>
		<description>Point out where I spoke about Kennedy, tomy.

But, since you bring him up, I suppose he did not intentionally drive off of the bridge.  He did, however, intentionally drink before driving.  He did intentionally not manage to rescue his passenger from the car.  And he did intentionally not notify the authorities until the following day.

tomy : Never let those pesky facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.  Your charge/allegation was that drugs or alcohol was invovled in Laura Bush&#039;s accident.  Surely you can point us to some documentation of that being the case.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point out where I spoke about Kennedy, tomy.</p>
<p>But, since you bring him up, I suppose he did not intentionally drive off of the bridge.  He did, however, intentionally drink before driving.  He did intentionally not manage to rescue his passenger from the car.  And he did intentionally not notify the authorities until the following day.</p>
<p>tomy : Never let those pesky facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.  Your charge/allegation was that drugs or alcohol was invovled in Laura Bush&#8217;s accident.  Surely you can point us to some documentation of that being the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/13/the-new-bias/#comment-22902</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1387#comment-22902</guid>
		<description>Tom, your analysis is idiotic and unsupported by the police investigation. But don&#039;t let facts get in the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, your analysis is idiotic and unsupported by the police investigation. But don&#8217;t let facts get in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
