Guess away, “doctor”. I hope you have a little bit more in your bag of tricks when you utilize your doctoring skills in the real world. Unless you think you’re a doctor because you always doctor the facts the way you like.

I don’t need to establish my credentials, or my citizenship, to the likes of you. Perhaps you could do some fact finding before you make wild accusations of someone else. Then again, why bother to start now? it’s almost as though you called me an arrogant prick while fellating the arrogant prick who’s been illegally squatting in the White House since 2001.

Oops. Sorry – different Reich winger. You all sound the same to me…

But clearly you still don’t get it…

Sure it does, Pedro, sure it does.

Not when discussion the fact that people who aren’t even americans are calling AMERICANS anti-american!

Any clearer yet paul?

Have you reviewed “Curious George” yet? Never mind, I will pick up an LA Weakly at the Quik-e-Mart, and get Wilbur to get me a slurpy.

Hilarious. Less than a week ago you were telling us all how much your expertise as a peer-review published scientist gave you extra authority in supporting the Bush administration’s war on science.

To answer your question Tom, Pedro is not a doctor but he plays one on this blog.

(I’m guessing Brit) starts calling people “Anti-American”, well, the bullsh*t flag just has to come up

Toss off you limey cretin…..LOL

Pedro, are you even a doctor?

Thanks for the lesson in willful Repugnicant ignorance of the facts.

The job of a fighter pilot is the most dangerous one that you can have in the military outside of a war.

You mean that if you don’t serve in a war zone your service doesn’t count…?

You don’t make a very convincing argument for ….anything with your discombobulated discussion based on …nothing.

BDS, its worse than drugs for destroying rational thought and discussion. You should get it treated…

The only thing Bush “fought” was gravity. (However, when he was drunk, as was so often the case in those days, he lost that particular battle.)

He did not serve in Vietnam. Not one day.

“Fighter Pilot.”

You guys give single celled organisms cause for hope. I simply can not fathom how dumb you all are on a genuinely consistent basis. I’m not calling you dumb because it’s the partisan thing to do. You are demonstrably dumb. It is, what it is.

You denigrate, and ridicule, a decorated veteran like Murtha, you tear apart guys who were wounded in service of the United States, like Kerry and Cleland…

But Bush was a “fighter pilot.”

My God.

JK

Tom, did that happen on live TV? Must have missed it&

I’m sure you would have missed it, since it didn’t air on Faux Snooze. And it must not have happened, because it didn’t happen on live TV, right? What a wanker…

Tom: I m not sure who Baby Doc Putsch is, but I can assure you noone s dick is in my mouth as you so distastefully and disgustingly put it.
If I correctly understand your poorly typed (whose dick was in your mouth while you were trying to type?) and poorly written comment, apparently Vice President s comment justifies Senator Leahy s attitude.
Makes sense to me& in a stupid, left wing kind of way.

Your stupidity is showing, traitor. Then again, that’s nothing new around here. I’d explain the rationale behind BabyDoc and PapaDoc Putsch to you, but there would be big words in the explanation, and I’m afraid it would go over your head. Again. Also, no spelling mistakes – and my comment seems to be understood by those with more than two brain cells rattling around their melon. So your lack of comprehension (sorry – ask mommy what that one means when you get out of the basement) is again no surprise. That faith based edumacation sure is a wonder!

And, finally, for the ethically challenged: no, I’m not making the point that Leahy’s attitude was justified (it was, but that’s not the discussion at hand. Just more Publican attempts to take the debate off-topic). I’m making the point that youir blustery outrage at Leahy for his statements is kinda hypocritical, considering that Pencil Dick made much more outrageous statements on the Senate floor to another senator, and it appears that was just hunky-dory with you Reich-wing types.

Cry me a river, poor baby. Did your feelings get hurt? Oh, that’s right – you support the Publicans. You have no feelings. Or morals.

Your assurances are meaningless. Just like the rest of the Publican talking points that ooze out of your vacuous pie hole on a daily basis around here. I suppose it appeared poorly written to you because there were no peans of praise to our glorious Chimperor (gee – who was I talking about that time? Maybe you can ask mommy about that one too!).

On one hand, it undermines the War on Terror to discuss operational details, thus the investigation into the NSA spy program is bad for America. The next minute, it perfectly OK to discuss opertional details as long as it’s Bush doing it in order to “smack down” liberals.

Which is it?

In fact, the White House didn’t want to talk about this very incident (the 2002 “plot”) back in October…but *all of a sudden* they’re little Chatty Cathy’s. What gives?

From the latest press gaggle:

Q It was not okay in October to talk about that level of detail?

MR. McCLELLAN: I didn’t say that. What I said was that they said that it was okay now to talk further about this specific plot.

Q Would it have been okay in October, but you chose not to?

MR. McCLELLAN: I don’t know how many times you’re going to keep asking the same question.

Q As soon as I get an answer.

It’s so obvious, to just about every person with a lick of common sense that these stories are being used to create a climate of fear. It works on you because you are afraid, you aren’t thinking clearly. Time be act brave and face the truth.

You’re being played, sucka.

We’ll, we all know how that turned out. I just wanted to hear you say it.

So, go ahead..say it.

As far as bush discussion PAST operations….it is a political necessity with all the leftist american haters screaming about our intel operations.

He believes, rightly, that after multiple slap-downs showing HOW our operations are saving (liberal) lives in LA (you’re welcome Paul, Frameone), perhaps you will stop your incessant mewling about how the POTUS is shredding the very constitution with his bare hands….

He believes, rightly, that after multiple slap-downs showing HOW our operations are saving (liberal) lives in LA (you re welcome Paul, Frameone),

So you’d admit it’s all about politics, and not about what’s best for the country at large? Welcome to the other side Pedro. We’ve all known long ago that the “War on Terror” was all about power and manipulation.

I didn’t even think to put together that it was LA, so, in turn, an attempt to win over “liberals”. Looks like his propaganda spoke directly to you though.

Btw, you do know that we’re supposed to believe the hijack plot involved using shoe-bombs to blow open the cockpit, were the terrorists were to take control of the plane and then fly it into a building.

Sound plausible to you? Shoe bombs…wouldn’t that just blow up the plane?

Might Bush’s propaganda people be getting two past stories mixed up in their heads (Richard Reid and 9/11), rather than this being an actual plot?

Shoe bombs…to hijack a plane, then ramming it into a building? It would have been a better story if it involved hijacking a plane by blowing up a shoebomb in the cockpit, then crashing the plane into a commuter train full of anthrax laden backpacks, which was on it’s way to an Israeli-theme disco/coffee house.

I think that just about covers all possible terrorist imagery.

That would be great- if it were simply touching on what she believed in. Is that how YOU saw it? Or did you see it as the speakers using the opportunity to do whatever they could to take swipes at the President of the United States for political reasons?

Corretta Scott King had so much more class than that. When she accompanied President Bush at the laying of a wreath at Martin Luther King’s grave last year, I don’t recall her using the occasion to make political statements aimed against the President. So why is it that people feel justified to do it “in her honor” at HER funeral.

The funeral shoud have never been focussed on the President of the United States, period. It should have stayed focussed on Coretta Scott King. And don’t give me that crap that it was. You must know better.

Just because you agree with the politics of what was said and how it was said doesn’t make it appropriate for the time.