<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Votes Yes On Corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:26:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21271</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21271</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There was no &quot;similar bill.&quot; There was no &quot;close vote.&quot;

It&#039;s OK, ian. You can admit that you misread OW&#039;s post and then made some stuff up in your comment. You can admit that banning lobbyists from the House gym is the your party&#039;s idea of &quot;reform.&quot; You don&#039;t have to be embarrassed.

However, most people would be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.</p></blockquote>
<p>There was no &#8220;similar bill.&#8221; There was no &#8220;close vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s OK, ian. You can admit that you misread OW&#8217;s post and then made some stuff up in your comment. You can admit that banning lobbyists from the House gym is the your party&#8217;s idea of &#8220;reform.&#8221; You don&#8217;t have to be embarrassed.</p>
<p>However, most people would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>ian takes Oliver seriously enough to post on Oliver&#039;s blog non-stop.  ian posts on this blog more than all the commenters on his blog combined.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ian takes Oliver seriously enough to post on Oliver&#8217;s blog non-stop.  ian posts on this blog more than all the commenters on his blog combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I try my best to not read most of Oliver s posts &amp;  I just assumed...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...and then blessed us with your wit. Thank you ever so much, junior.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I try my best to not read most of Oliver s posts &#038;  I just assumed&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;and then blessed us with your wit. Thank you ever so much, junior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>Quaker in his parents&#039; basement,

Anyone who takes Oliver seriously, shouldn&#039;t be taken seriously.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker in his parents&#8217; basement,</p>
<p>Anyone who takes Oliver seriously, shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21267</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21267</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Say, peewee. What vote &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; that you were thinking of?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.</p></blockquote>
<p>Say, peewee. What vote <i>was</i> that you were thinking of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21266</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21266</guid>
		<description>I hear these guys have lots of openings- 5 more today, a matter of fact

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goarmy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goarmy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.goarmy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

What do you say ian, how about you becoming an army of one?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear these guys have lots of openings- 5 more today, a matter of fact</p>
<p><a href="http://www.goarmy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.goarmy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.goarmy.com</a></p>
<p>What do you say ian, how about you becoming an army of one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21265</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21265</guid>
		<description>Did you or did you not support the war in Afghanistan? You chickenhawk.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you or did you not support the war in Afghanistan? You chickenhawk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>Quaker in his parents&#039; basement,

I try my best to not read most of Oliver&#039;s posts ... I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.

They do teach about getting a job, don&#039;t they?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker in his parents&#8217; basement,</p>
<p>I try my best to not read most of Oliver&#8217;s posts &#8230; I just assumed this was about the close vote on the floor about a similar bill that barely passed yesterday.</p>
<p>They do teach about getting a job, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21263</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21263</guid>
		<description>Final vote? Voted for the bill?

Ian, they &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; teach reading at your school, don&#039;t they?

&lt;blockquote&gt;House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier (R-Calif.), who was to unveil a draft of the full lobbying reform package yesterday, &lt;b&gt;instead announced it was not ready.&lt;/b&gt; Dreier did press forward with &lt;b&gt;a change in House rules that bans former members who have become lobbyists from the House floor and the House gym.&lt;/b&gt; It also strips lobbyist spouses of current lawmakers of floor and gym privileges.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow! That&#039;s some re-freakin&#039;-form, ain&#039;t it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final vote? Voted for the bill?</p>
<p>Ian, they <i>do</i> teach reading at your school, don&#8217;t they?</p>
<blockquote><p>House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier (R-Calif.), who was to unveil a draft of the full lobbying reform package yesterday, <b>instead announced it was not ready.</b> Dreier did press forward with <b>a change in House rules that bans former members who have become lobbyists from the House floor and the House gym.</b> It also strips lobbyist spouses of current lawmakers of floor and gym privileges.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow! That&#8217;s some re-freakin&#8217;-form, ain&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeaderoftheFreeWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21262</link>
		<dc:creator>LeaderoftheFreeWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21262</guid>
		<description>A Boner, Blunt or Shagging?  I&#039;d prefer shagging just about anytime, but I think I&#039;ll just settle with a Boner!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Boner, Blunt or Shagging?  I&#8217;d prefer shagging just about anytime, but I think I&#8217;ll just settle with a Boner!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21261</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21261</guid>
		<description>Oliver, did you note the final vote? Of course not, because a higher percentage of Rep voted for the bill in the end than Democrats did.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, did you note the final vote? Of course not, because a higher percentage of Rep voted for the bill in the end than Democrats did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeaderoftheFreeWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21260</link>
		<dc:creator>LeaderoftheFreeWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21260</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time, this should have been done years ago...and people wonder why Congressmen have no credibility?  And finally, Congress can exercise in peace and quiet without having 10 ex-Congressman lobbyists jockeying to try to get them to vote on this or that...as if this shouldn&#039;t have already been the case.  But does that mean they have to give up the free vacations too?  That&#039;s just going too far, Oliver?!?!  How is Congress going to get anything done without those lobbyist-paid, free 2-week retreats to ski resorts and Bora Bora???  And secret campaign contributions??  I guess I&#039;d fight it to if I were in office, especially with an upcoming trip to the Cayman Islands on the verge of being cancelled.

I&#039;d have to say, &quot;Hey! Hey! Hey!  why don&#039;t you wait until I&#039;m out of office before you start making these changes?!?&quot;  What&#039;s the point of running for Congress if you can&#039;t take advantage of the perks???...such as being picked by a lobbying firm for 10 times your Congressman salary just for promising to vote a certain way on crap like the Environment, Health Care, Social Security, and a little war here and there.  If this isn&#039;t how it&#039;s supposed to work, please someone tell me know so I can consider a new line of work!!


Top House Republican becomes chief US drug company lobbyist:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

He did it, why can&#039;t I??  It&#039;s not fair dammit, it&#039;s just not fair!!!

Yours truly,
Tom DeLay--don&#039;t delay, vote for ME for President 2008!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time, this should have been done years ago&#8230;and people wonder why Congressmen have no credibility?  And finally, Congress can exercise in peace and quiet without having 10 ex-Congressman lobbyists jockeying to try to get them to vote on this or that&#8230;as if this shouldn&#8217;t have already been the case.  But does that mean they have to give up the free vacations too?  That&#8217;s just going too far, Oliver?!?!  How is Congress going to get anything done without those lobbyist-paid, free 2-week retreats to ski resorts and Bora Bora???  And secret campaign contributions??  I guess I&#8217;d fight it to if I were in office, especially with an upcoming trip to the Cayman Islands on the verge of being cancelled.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to say, &#8220;Hey! Hey! Hey!  why don&#8217;t you wait until I&#8217;m out of office before you start making these changes?!?&#8221;  What&#8217;s the point of running for Congress if you can&#8217;t take advantage of the perks???&#8230;such as being picked by a lobbying firm for 10 times your Congressman salary just for promising to vote a certain way on crap like the Environment, Health Care, Social Security, and a little war here and there.  If this isn&#8217;t how it&#8217;s supposed to work, please someone tell me know so I can consider a new line of work!!</p>
<p>Top House Republican becomes chief US drug company lobbyist:<br />
<a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/dec2004/tauz-d18.shtml</a></p>
<p>He did it, why can&#8217;t I??  It&#8217;s not fair dammit, it&#8217;s just not fair!!!</p>
<p>Yours truly,<br />
Tom DeLay&#8211;don&#8217;t delay, vote for ME for President 2008!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21259</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21259</guid>
		<description>Dude, I tried Crack with Lime, but Vanilla Crack is still my favorite.  Way more flavor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, I tried Crack with Lime, but Vanilla Crack is still my favorite.  Way more flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/02/02/gop-votes-yes-on-corruption/#comment-21258</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1317#comment-21258</guid>
		<description>A twelve-step program has the necessary requisite of admitting to the substance abuse before any progress can be made toward recovery.
Denial sometimes makes an intervention necessary where the addict is confronted by his peers and forced into detox.
The cheap money addicts are no different.  If they don t voluntarily submit to detox, the voters will intervene in  06.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A twelve-step program has the necessary requisite of admitting to the substance abuse before any progress can be made toward recovery.<br />
Denial sometimes makes an intervention necessary where the addict is confronted by his peers and forced into detox.<br />
The cheap money addicts are no different.  If they don t voluntarily submit to detox, the voters will intervene in  06.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
