Comments on: A Moment Of Outrage from CK

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:02:30 +0000

Lets just say that some of us are man enough we don’t need to get a big dog to compensate for any shortcomings. And I’ll put my little 8lb dog up against any of the big boys any day.

By: randy

randy — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:02:16 +0000

Jeez OW, couldn’t you get a man sized dog instead of a Paris Hilton purse dog? I mean if you’ve got to have a German breed, why not a Weimaraner, Pinscher, or Pointer? Not only do I question your political persuasion, now I question your sexual persuasion…”not that there’s anything wrong with that.”

By: qkslvr_wolf

qkslvr_wolf — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:02:35 +0000

Wow, its really pathetic that the trolls on this site can’t even manage to reach across the aisle to give a crap abouot puppies. Instead, they’d rather use the puppies to carry their crap…

Does this mean wingnut trolls=animal abusing drug dealers?

By: Bushwacked

Bushwacked — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:02:11 +0000

Bush’s new doggy terrorist policy”
Random ass sniffings to check for illegal drugs. And the dogs dont even need a warrant. Wait Bush doesn’t either, so this is right in line with his new “terrorist surveillance” policy, that he lied about in 2004. Will CR or SM be the ones assigned to do the sniffing?

By: JK

JK — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:02:53 +0000

Don’t diss the dog….I can clearly see that OW’s dog has got Mojo.

Frankly, Ian…I wonder how conservatives like you find enjoyment out of *anything.* You’re all so damn uptight…you hate art, and have horrible taste in movies and music. (Caruso’s taste in Hollywood women is abhorrent.)

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:02:13 +0000

Ok, I tolerate your other nonsense – but don’t insult my dog. Fuck you.

By: TomboyMS

TomboyMS — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:02:15 +0000

“How can you get enjoyment out of a thing the size of a hot dog you eat.”

I bet you get that a lot.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:02:35 +0000

In George W. Bush’s America, the stomachs’ of all dogs would be examined, because if a stomach goes unexamined, how do we know that the dog isn’t a terrorist? We must examine all dogs stomachs, because what if the dogs’ stomach came in contact with a terrorist dog’s stomach?
If we wait to examine dog’s stomachs for a warrant, we waste valuable time finding out whether the dog’s stomach contains WMD’s.

Why do some dogs hate our freedom?

Ferris, your post is Stuck on Stupid. Most of them are, actually. But don’t worry, even CK: The Weiner Dog on Infinite Justice would love you and ian if given the chance.

By: SaveFarris

SaveFarris — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:02:49 +0000

In Ted Kennedy’s America, this would be more commonplace as Dog Searches would be unConstitutional via the 4th Amendment.

By: ian

ian — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:02:19 +0000

Ugh, what ugly dogs. How can you get enjoyment out of a thing the size of a hot dog you eat.

By: grendelkhan

grendelkhan — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:02:58 +0000

I saw this yesterday! How evil can someone be to cut up puppies and smuggle drugs inside them?

They must be republicans.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:02:38 +0000

In an entirely unrelated story, NPR had a man on yesterday’s All Things Considered who owns 58 robotic dogs. Cost him nearly $100K.

Not answered: Why?

For twenty bucks, you can rescue a mutt from the pound who will provide more companionship than all 58 robodogs combined. I mean, can you imagine replacing CK with a chip-driven bundle of nuts and bolts?

By: Ryland

Ryland — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:02:15 +0000

It probably shouldn’t, but that disturbs me more than stories about humans hiding drugs in their bodies. At least the human usually volunteers to be a drug mule, but forcing a dog to do it, that’s just fucked up. And I don’t even like dogs.