Breaking News
CBO Report: Health Care Reform Reduces Deficit By $1 Trillion

Shorter Bush



('DiggThis’)

Share

“You know I didn’t break the law, because, well, I keep saying so. Soy el rey. Viva Bush”

Anyone notice the jocularity from his post-election-I’m-gonna-privatize-social-security press conferences is gone? Yep, I did too.

You can’t convince me that this camera malfunction wasn’t God’s way of saying he doesn’t like ugly.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

19 Responses to “Shorter Bush”

  1. Brandon says:

    Perhaps if the reporters would listen to him the first time when he answers the question about Abramoff, they wouldn’t have to ask dumbass follow-up questions that really aren’t follow-ups at all.

  2. Semanticleo says:

    At least he seemed to have allowed his morning coffee to take full effect
    before the press conference.

    I do love the quote however, “I’m gonna keep sayin’…er…uh…you know,
    …what I just said”.

  3. cellulose says:

    GW: “I didn’t not have economic relations with that man!”

  4. Hattie says:

    Wankerrrrrr….

  5. mikmik says:

    “January 26th, 2006 at 12:18 pm
    GW:  I didn t not have economic relations with that man!
    cellulose Says

    That is one of the greatest one liners I have ever witnessed!

  6. Brandon says:

    Neither did any of the Democrats who accepted money from Abramoff’s clients I guess.

    Do you guys get busy from all this spinning?

  7. ian says:

    How is he breaking the law? I know that you liberals like catch phrases and talking points, but he has constitutional powers.

  8. ian says:

    Re: Brandon

    You should try listening to a daily press briefing, about 50% of the answers from McClellan have the words “I have already explained this” or “this was already said” in them.

  9. Brandon,

    Please explain to us how that’s the same thing as accepting money directly from Abramoff?

    Are the tribes not allowed to donated to anyone?

  10. Captain Sunshine says:

    The only clients of Jack Abramoff that donated money to Democrats, did so before they became his clients. The tribal governments that picked up Abramoff cut their donations by half to Democrats, and doubled them to Republicans.

    Abramoff pushed his clients not to give money to Democrats. They did so against his wishes, not in favor of them. Abramoff did not direct anyone to give money to Democrats.

    It’s a Republican scandal. Only. Pure and simple.

    CS

  11. frameone says:

    I’m with mikmik:  I didn t not have economic relations with that man!
    LOL

  12. JWG says:

    Are the tribes not allowed to donated to anyone?

    and

    Abramoff did not direct anyone to give money to Democrats.

    Huh? I’d be interested in your source for this. According to the WaPo:

    According to documents and tribal officials familiar with the Abramoff team’s methods, the lobbyists devised lengthy lists of lawmakers to whom the tribes should donate and then delivered the lists to the tribes. The tribes, in turn, wrote checks to the recommended campaign committees and in the amounts the lobbyists prescribed. The money went to incumbents or selected candidates in open seats.
    [...]
    Of the 18 largest recipients of tribe contributions directed by Abramoff’s group, six, or one-third, were Democrats.

    Maybe it will turn out that “directed by” was not the correct term in some/many/all cases.

  13. AnalogKid says:

    Thank you, JWG, for showing us all where the Captain’s sunshine comes out of.

    So Captain, do you have any other fairy tales you’d like to spin?

    I want to hear the one about how Patty Murray, my state Senator and ranking Democrat on that least three major committees became the ninth most contributed to person by Abramoff and his clients (after they hired him, BTW).

    I especially like the part about how Indian tribes from the Southeastern part of the country contributed tens of thousands of dollars to re-elect a Senator from a state that is physically the furthest away from their home states (in the continental US)?

    Do you know that one Captain? Because I’ve heard her tell it, but all she can say is that she cannot afford to give the money back so she won’t. Or maybe she said that she refused to score cheap points by being clean so she decided that staying dirty was better.

    I wish I could tell you, but she who thinks that Osama bin Laden builds daycare centers has clammed up and refuses to speak on the matter any more.

  14. Semanticleo says:

    Analogkid, et al;

    “How many time must we tell you children not to spoil your appetites?”

    The nuance between scalpel and sledgehammer may escape your
    sensibilities, so let me say this one more time;

    Only republicans are currently being investigated for QUID PRO QUO
    donations. The scandal is not about donations per se.

    It is about money and perks that are TIED TO SPECIFIC ACTS.

    Unless you want to parse words and bandy your brand of semantic
    pedantry just to argue, stop beating the skin on your hollow drums.

  15. “but he has constitutional powers”
    Did he get them from a cracker jack box? You’re almost done with high school, aren’t you? Did you sleep through history or social studies? You do know that the President doesn’t just get to wave a magical fairy wand, right?

  16. JWG says:

    Only republicans are currently being investigated for QUID PRO QUO donations.

    Source please.

  17. Semanticleo says:

    Name one dem who is under investigation,

  18. factcheck says:

    Semanticleo, you better narrow that down to “illegal Abramoff contributions” or else someone will drag up a Democratic former E. Quogue town council member from the 70’s that has too many parking tickets, because, see, that is just as bad as giving away the public interest for a gourmet meal.

  19. Semanticleo says:

    Fact…

    I should know better.

Oliver Willis

Contact
Email: owillis@gmail.com
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
AIM: oliverwill
Huffington Post Columns
Media Matters Blog Entries