Comments on: Bush’s Bagman http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:48:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: buma http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19909 buma Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:01:29 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19909 Again, Abramoff only came to the WH often because it was the easier for him to bump into Jeff Gannon. Again, Abramoff only came to the WH often because it was the easier for him to bump into Jeff Gannon.

]]> By: Dugger http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19908 Dugger Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:01:17 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19908 hey Jadegold. Bush was never AWOL. That has never been true. Dugger hey Jadegold.

Bush was never AWOL. That has never been true.

Dugger

]]> By: qkslvr_wolf http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19907 qkslvr_wolf Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:01:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19907 Give him time. He'll get around to it. Give him time. He’ll get around to it.

]]> By: Leroy Brown http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19906 Leroy Brown Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:01:11 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19906 Farris, My point is that if he's lying about knowing/meeting/being buddies with Abramoff, what else is he lying about? After all, perjury is an impeachable offense, even if its not about a sexual act... Farris,

My point is that if he’s lying about knowing/meeting/being buddies with Abramoff, what else is he lying about? After all, perjury is an impeachable offense, even if its not about a sexual act…

]]> By: SaveFarris http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19905 SaveFarris Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:01:37 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19905 Leroy, it was for lying before a grand jury and obstructing justice. I'm not aware of Bush doing either of those things. Leroy, it was for lying before a grand jury and obstructing justice.

I’m not aware of Bush doing either of those things.

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19904 midderpidge Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:01:24 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19904 Remember JadeGold, that $100,000 bought Abramoff a seat on the transition team, allowing him to help select people for the Dept of Interior, which in turn, includes the Department of Indian Affairs! What a coincidence! Remember JadeGold, that $100,000 bought Abramoff a seat on the transition team, allowing him to help select people for the Dept of Interior, which in turn, includes the Department of Indian Affairs! What a coincidence!

]]> By: Leroy Brown http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19903 Leroy Brown Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:01:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19903 Farris, And didn't you guys impeach him for that? So... you're point is...? Farris,

And didn’t you guys impeach him for that? So… you’re point is…?

]]> By: SaveFarris http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19902 SaveFarris Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:01:35 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19902 If lying about being <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/50000/images/_50385_hug.jpg" rel="nofollow">shown together in a picture</a> is such a crime... If lying about being shown together in a picture is such a crime…

]]> By: Jadegold http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19901 Jadegold Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:01:55 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19901 It's kind of an appalling lie that AWOL George claims not to know Abramoff. Think about it. Abramoff is a Bush 'Pioneer' which means he brought in $100K to Bush's campaign. Anybody who has ever worked on a national campaign knows that if you bring in a $100K--that candidate probably has your cell phone number memorized. And Abramoff's been to the WH almost 200 times. It’s kind of an appalling lie that AWOL George claims not to know Abramoff.

Think about it. Abramoff is a Bush ‘Pioneer’ which means he brought in $100K to Bush’s campaign. Anybody who has ever worked on a national campaign knows that if you bring in a $100K–that candidate probably has your cell phone number memorized.

And Abramoff’s been to the WH almost 200 times.

]]> By: frameone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19900 frameone Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:01:20 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19900 I don't know, Save. Did Scott McClellan ever say that the President does not know Kennedy, or that the President does not recall ever meeting him? That's what McClellan said about Bush and Abramoff. The article does not assert that Bush is guilty of anything except sending his press man out to lie about his relationship Abramoff. "Scott McClellan said the now disgraced lobbyist had attended two huge holiday receptions and a few "staff-level meetings" that were not worth describing further. "The President does not know him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him," McClellan said." I don’t know, Save. Did Scott McClellan ever say that the President does not know Kennedy, or that the President does not recall ever meeting him? That’s what McClellan said about Bush and Abramoff.

The article does not assert that Bush is guilty of anything except sending his press man out to lie about his relationship Abramoff.

“Scott McClellan said the now disgraced lobbyist had attended two huge holiday receptions and a few “staff-level meetings” that were not worth describing further. “The President does not know him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him,” McClellan said.”

]]> By: SaveFarris http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19899 SaveFarris Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:01:47 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19899 Five pictures, eh? I guess if you can find 6 photographs of Bush and Ted Kennedy, you're going to add the death of Mary Joe Kopechne to the bill of Impeachment. Eh? Five pictures, eh? I guess if you can find 6 photographs of Bush and Ted Kennedy, you’re going to add the death of Mary Joe Kopechne to the bill of Impeachment.

Eh?

]]> By: mr.curmudgeon http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19898 mr.curmudgeon Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:01:49 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19898 If we ever got to the bottom of the Plame thing, and the VeeP is implicated, I'm fairly certain Bush would say he's never met Cheney before. I bet you Bush supporters would believe him too. I mean, Dubya is a busy man...can't be bothered to know <i>everyone</i> running about town. If we ever got to the bottom of the Plame thing, and the VeeP is implicated, I’m fairly certain Bush would say he’s never met Cheney before.

I bet you Bush supporters would believe him too. I mean, Dubya is a busy man…can’t be bothered to know everyone running about town.

]]> By: Dr. frameone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19897 Dr. frameone Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:01:41 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19897 That isn't Bush. Those photos are obviously photoshopped. Bush never met Abramoff. Democrats took money from Abramoff too. Look, terrorists in your cereal bowl ... That isn’t Bush. Those photos are obviously photoshopped. Bush never met Abramoff. Democrats took money from Abramoff too. Look, terrorists in your cereal bowl …

]]> By: paulbeard http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/22/bushs-bagman/#comment-19896 paulbeard Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:01:32 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1258#comment-19896 So why doesn't Time publish them? They claim they can't afford them? So why doesn’t Time publish them? They claim they can’t afford them?

]]>