Comments on: The Republican White House’s Cozy Relationship With Indicted Republican Criminal Jack Abramoff

By: buma

buma — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:01:53 +0000

Maybe Abramoff was just in the White House for a little liaison with Jeff Gannon. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

By: rainlion

rainlion — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:01:20 +0000

Zambo… your intellectual dishonesty is frankly breath taking… I love your attempt at backing your premise up with a June Post article, which doesn’t support you. Conveniently ignoring the facts and context is more appropriate a charge to yourself, than factCheck.

Hmmm… you could’ve at least cited one of the more recent post articles that specifically addresses the issue – but then, none of those actually support your premise either.

Nice try. Good day.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:49 +0000

Did Jack Abramoff change his name to “Tribal Donations”? There is no proof there that Abramoff directed any donations to Democrats, or that Democrats knew who Abramoff was or that he was directing donations to Democrats.

Again, for the dense (that’s you zambo), no Democrat took money from Abramoff. Zero. Nothing.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:12 +0000

Proof? No Democrat took money from Abramoff. Zero. Nothing.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:09 +0000

Shoo little troll. Go back under the bridge before you get run over. Shoo.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:01:50 +0000

No Democrat took money from Abramoff. Zero. Nothing. Zambo is lying.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:01:32 +0000

No Democrat took money from Abramoff. Zero. Nothing. Zambo is lying.

By: TomY

TomY — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:01:49 +0000

So Zambo, you admit you have no problem with Abramoff selling access to Bush to the highest bidder? You admit that you place a higher value on attacking Democrats than on defending American democracy?

By: TomY

TomY — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:01:33 +0000

It’s always Clinton with you guys. It’s fucking pathological. Got nothing to say about our shitty President’s dishonest, secretive, corrupt ways? Change the subject to Clinton. Are you people for real? Anyway, it’s quite clear that Abramoff was offering his clients access to the WH in exchange for money. At least we all agree on that.

By: mr.curmudgeon

mr.curmudgeon — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:01:11 +0000

I hope you re just as tough on this administration as you were during the Lincoln Bedroom & Morning Coffee days.

Then I’d say the same should go for your side. From what I remember, the right couldn’t shut up about the Lincoln bedroom story. Yet, now, when it comes to an exponentially bigger scandal involving admitted GOP criminals…all we get is “but clinton!!!”

Isn’t that hypocritical as well?

By: Semanticleo

Semanticleo — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:01:09 +0000

Zambo;

The investigation is about quid pro quo donations. If all contributions
were a crime your silly documentation would have meaning.

Go peddle your diversionary snake oil at Polipunidt or Little Green
Boogers or whatever.

By: Ryland

Ryland — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:01:09 +0000

Why don’t they just have the Justice Department wave their magic wand so that taking money from Abramoff isn’t illegal anymore, like with warrantless wiretaps?

By: JD

JD — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:01:58 +0000

So now it is a crime to have met with him ?

By: midderpidge

midderpidge — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:01:17 +0000

Have you noticed how these disgraced criminals like Abramoff and Ken Lay all served on Bush’s transition teams charged with choosing appointments to the various departments and bureaus like the FERC (Lay) or Dept Interior (Abramoff). MMMMMM… Bush campaign donor’s money at work.

By: withinreason

withinreason — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:01:14 +0000

http://americablog.blogspot.com/DAY_TRADERS.mp3

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:01:06 +0000

JD: I don’t know if any crime has been committed, but a Republican criminal met with the President in the White House. We should be privy to the details. We sort of own the building, you know.