<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right Doesn&#8217;t Get Dr. King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:22:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19274</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19274</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;drpedro Says:

January 17th, 2006 at 11:12 am
mikmik, if you can, swim upstream and read my pages of links to med school admissions profiles&amp; those are the facts you were looking for.

I imagine when the democrats stop promoting a racist affirmative action agenda, we will find a broader spectrum of our society doing a variety of things. Currently though, the leftist believe that the only way a  minority  can take advantage of education, public jobs and public contracts is by giving them special benefits that non  minorities  don t get.

That is racism, pure and simple&amp; and it is part of the Democratic Party Platform.
&lt;/em&gt;
I don&#039;t agree with you one bit. I am sorry for calling you names, though. That is not right to do.

Naa nana ;o)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>drpedro Says:</p>
<p>January 17th, 2006 at 11:12 am<br />
mikmik, if you can, swim upstream and read my pages of links to med school admissions profiles&#038; those are the facts you were looking for.</p>
<p>I imagine when the democrats stop promoting a racist affirmative action agenda, we will find a broader spectrum of our society doing a variety of things. Currently though, the leftist believe that the only way a  minority  can take advantage of education, public jobs and public contracts is by giving them special benefits that non  minorities  don t get.</p>
<p>That is racism, pure and simple&#038; and it is part of the Democratic Party Platform.<br />
</em><br />
I don&#8217;t agree with you one bit. I am sorry for calling you names, though. That is not right to do.</p>
<p>Naa nana ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19273</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19273</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt; Religious authorities disagree with extra punishments such as honor killing and prohibit it, so the practice of it is a cultural issue.&lt;/em&gt;
I repeat, what does a &#039;cultural issue&#039; have to do with US society? If you are seeing in terms of culture, you are seeing biased.

I know plenty of people that have it made because they are spoiled, and I know plenty of people that are hard workers, and suffer in poverty.

It is not an indication of effort if you are rich or poor, I think that ias a feeble excuse to justify inequality in society. There are more poor minority people than % of population, far more than could be explained than by &#039;harder working&#039;. It is cultural and racial bias.
What Martin Luthor King Jr. despaired over, is still true today, only perhaps in a slight difference of degree.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> Religious authorities disagree with extra punishments such as honor killing and prohibit it, so the practice of it is a cultural issue.</em><br />
I repeat, what does a &#8216;cultural issue&#8217; have to do with US society? If you are seeing in terms of culture, you are seeing biased.</p>
<p>I know plenty of people that have it made because they are spoiled, and I know plenty of people that are hard workers, and suffer in poverty.</p>
<p>It is not an indication of effort if you are rich or poor, I think that ias a feeble excuse to justify inequality in society. There are more poor minority people than % of population, far more than could be explained than by &#8216;harder working&#8217;. It is cultural and racial bias.<br />
What Martin Luthor King Jr. despaired over, is still true today, only perhaps in a slight difference of degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19272</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19272</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ever think of people as just  people ?&lt;/i&gt;

All the time.  And that&#039;s one of the key differences between conservatives and liberals... conservatives tend to base their opinion of a person on their character and their actions.  Liberals just can&#039;t seem to separate the person from their ethnic or cultural group.  Conservatives see the individual, liberals see the group.

&lt;i&gt;You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s your opinion.  I disagree, but that&#039;s my opinion too.  That still doesn&#039;t make you a better or worse person or more or less equal than me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ever think of people as just  people ?</i></p>
<p>All the time.  And that&#8217;s one of the key differences between conservatives and liberals&#8230; conservatives tend to base their opinion of a person on their character and their actions.  Liberals just can&#8217;t seem to separate the person from their ethnic or cultural group.  Conservatives see the individual, liberals see the group.</p>
<p><i>You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s your opinion.  I disagree, but that&#8217;s my opinion too.  That still doesn&#8217;t make you a better or worse person or more or less equal than me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19271</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19271</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined&lt;/i&gt;

Oh and by the way, I am a Christian but not a &quot;Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical&quot;.  I find people like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell both amusing and disturbing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined</i></p>
<p>Oh and by the way, I am a Christian but not a &#8220;Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical&#8221;.  I find people like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell both amusing and disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19270</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19270</guid>
		<description>mikmik, if you can, swim upstream and read my pages of links to med school admissions profiles...those are the facts you were looking for.

I imagine when the democrats stop promoting a racist affirmative action agenda, we will find a broader spectrum of our society doing a variety of things.  Currently though, the leftist believe that the only way a &quot;minority&quot; can take advantage of education, public jobs and public contracts is by giving them special benefits that non &quot;minorities&quot; don&#039;t get.

That is racism, pure and simple...and it is part of the Democratic Party Platform.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mikmik, if you can, swim upstream and read my pages of links to med school admissions profiles&#8230;those are the facts you were looking for.</p>
<p>I imagine when the democrats stop promoting a racist affirmative action agenda, we will find a broader spectrum of our society doing a variety of things.  Currently though, the leftist believe that the only way a &#8220;minority&#8221; can take advantage of education, public jobs and public contracts is by giving them special benefits that non &#8220;minorities&#8221; don&#8217;t get.</p>
<p>That is racism, pure and simple&#8230;and it is part of the Democratic Party Platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19269</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What a moron. I know that it is Islamic to practice  protecting the family honor , I never said anything about that it isn t.  It is your simple, yet still misunderstood by you, assumption that it is only a cultural thing.
&lt;/i&gt;

Do you even read this stuff?  I specifically quoted a statement that said it&#039;s NOT religious but it IS cultural.  You even copied it in your post!

Here, I&#039;ll quote it again, with special emphasis for the thinking-impaired:

 &lt;b&gt;Religious authorities disagree with extra punishments such as honor killing and prohibit it&lt;/b&gt;, so &lt;b&gt;the practice of it is a cultural issue&lt;/b&gt;. But since Islam has influence over vast Muslims, culturalist and murderers of females use Islam to justify honor killing even though &lt;b&gt;there is no support for honor killing in Islam.&lt;/b&gt;

You&#039;re making it crystal clear who the moron is here, mikmik.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What a moron. I know that it is Islamic to practice  protecting the family honor , I never said anything about that it isn t.  It is your simple, yet still misunderstood by you, assumption that it is only a cultural thing.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Do you even read this stuff?  I specifically quoted a statement that said it&#8217;s NOT religious but it IS cultural.  You even copied it in your post!</p>
<p>Here, I&#8217;ll quote it again, with special emphasis for the thinking-impaired:</p>
<p> <b>Religious authorities disagree with extra punishments such as honor killing and prohibit it</b>, so <b>the practice of it is a cultural issue</b>. But since Islam has influence over vast Muslims, culturalist and murderers of females use Islam to justify honor killing even though <b>there is no support for honor killing in Islam.</b></p>
<p>You&#8217;re making it crystal clear who the moron is here, mikmik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19268</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19268</guid>
		<description>Frank_D says:
&lt;em&gt;mikmik: Your schizophrenically written comments defy reponse.
You are in need of therapy&lt;/em&gt;

Look man, flattery will get you no where ;o)

If I use names, say STFU mikmik, we all want what&#039;s best, that&#039;s what counts!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank_D says:<br />
<em>mikmik: Your schizophrenically written comments defy reponse.<br />
You are in need of therapy</em></p>
<p>Look man, flattery will get you no where ;o)</p>
<p>If I use names, say STFU mikmik, we all want what&#8217;s best, that&#8217;s what counts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19266</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19266</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;
When I interact with people in those cultures, I treat them as equal human beings, with decency and respect. That still doesn t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own.&lt;/em&gt;

Absolutely! They are &#039;people&#039; who are members of a culture, eh?
&lt;em&gt;That still doesn t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own&lt;/em&gt;
No, you are not biased.

Ever think of people as just &#039;people&#039;? You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
When I interact with people in those cultures, I treat them as equal human beings, with decency and respect. That still doesn t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own.</em></p>
<p>Absolutely! They are &#8216;people&#8217; who are members of a culture, eh?<br />
<em>That still doesn t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own</em><br />
No, you are not biased.</p>
<p>Ever think of people as just &#8216;people&#8217;? You and your Fundamentalisrt Christian Evangelical culture. You are not equal to me, my culture is more refined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19267</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19267</guid>
		<description>Since this post was ostensibly about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I wonder what his impressions would be of Sen. Clinton&#039;s slave reference yesterday, or Mayor Nagins desire to rebuild a chocolate New Orleans.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this post was ostensibly about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I wonder what his impressions would be of Sen. Clinton&#8217;s slave reference yesterday, or Mayor Nagins desire to rebuild a chocolate New Orleans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19265</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19265</guid>
		<description>Anyways, I am guilty of prejudging you, VRWC, just because you said you are conservative.

I learned already debating with you here, I respect you a lot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyways, I am guilty of prejudging you, VRWC, just because you said you are conservative.</p>
<p>I learned already debating with you here, I respect you a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19263</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19263</guid>
		<description>And  dipstick ? Is that the best you could do, or are you just going easy on me?

No, that is a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat, calling names.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And  dipstick ? Is that the best you could do, or are you just going easy on me?</p>
<p>No, that is a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat, calling names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19264</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19264</guid>
		<description>mikmik: Your schizophrenically written comments defy reponse.
You are in need of therapy.
You apparently don&#039;t even recognize the content of other people&#039;s comments -- not just my own.
Your responses are composed almost entirely of belligerence, with no substance.
I am not a psychiatrist, but I have worked in mental health for about ten years, and I am sure there is help availble for you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mikmik: Your schizophrenically written comments defy reponse.<br />
You are in need of therapy.<br />
You apparently don&#8217;t even recognize the content of other people&#8217;s comments &#8212; not just my own.<br />
Your responses are composed almost entirely of belligerence, with no substance.<br />
I am not a psychiatrist, but I have worked in mental health for about ten years, and I am sure there is help availble for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19262</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19262</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Since this post was ostensibly about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I wonder what his impressions would be of Sen. Clinton s slave reference yesterday, or Mayor Nagins desire to rebuild a chocolate New Orleans. &lt;/i&gt;

ian asked the same thing upthread yesterday.  Radio silence from OW or anyone else here.  I guess the options are to either (1) come out and criticize it or (2) support it, either vocally or by staying silent.  I guess the consensus from OW and the liberals here is for (2).

I&#039;m concerned that Mayor Nagin has been stealing from Pat Robertson&#039;s playbook... he said that &quot;&quot;Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it&#039;s destroyed and put stress on this country&quot;.

And in his comments about a &quot;chocolate New Orleans&quot; the mayor also said &quot;This city will be a majority-African American city. It&#039;s the way God wants it to be. You can&#039;t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn&#039;t be New Orleans.&quot;

Nope.  No racism there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since this post was ostensibly about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I wonder what his impressions would be of Sen. Clinton s slave reference yesterday, or Mayor Nagins desire to rebuild a chocolate New Orleans. </i></p>
<p>ian asked the same thing upthread yesterday.  Radio silence from OW or anyone else here.  I guess the options are to either (1) come out and criticize it or (2) support it, either vocally or by staying silent.  I guess the consensus from OW and the liberals here is for (2).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m concerned that Mayor Nagin has been stealing from Pat Robertson&#8217;s playbook&#8230; he said that &#8220;&#8221;Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it&#8217;s destroyed and put stress on this country&#8221;.</p>
<p>And in his comments about a &#8220;chocolate New Orleans&#8221; the mayor also said &#8220;This city will be a majority-African American city. It&#8217;s the way God wants it to be. You can&#8217;t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn&#8217;t be New Orleans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope.  No racism there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19261</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19261</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;the family s honor has been slighted by them, that s racism?&lt;/em&gt;

Of course, only a bigot would assume that this behavior would be indicative of another race. It is not like rednecks, or WASP liberal mysogynists could ever do anything like that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>the family s honor has been slighted by them, that s racism?</em></p>
<p>Of course, only a bigot would assume that this behavior would be indicative of another race. It is not like rednecks, or WASP liberal mysogynists could ever do anything like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19260</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19260</guid>
		<description>The same goes for blacks, or any other minority. If they are not treated equal and given the same education as everyone else and this renders them less likely to apply for university, it is still unequal opprtunity.

You try to say that &#039;numbers who apply&#039;, but you conveniently ignore the factors that determines who get&#039;s to apply, and who gets a proper education.

Don&#039;t be so stupid, try to expand your simple little mind to see the whole picture. I don&#039;t fall for falsely represented situations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same goes for blacks, or any other minority. If they are not treated equal and given the same education as everyone else and this renders them less likely to apply for university, it is still unequal opprtunity.</p>
<p>You try to say that &#8216;numbers who apply&#8217;, but you conveniently ignore the factors that determines who get&#8217;s to apply, and who gets a proper education.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be so stupid, try to expand your simple little mind to see the whole picture. I don&#8217;t fall for falsely represented situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19259</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19259</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It means that women should have an equal opportunity to apply, dipstick. If they are not allowed to, or unable to apply because of their financial situation, or lack of education because they are oppressed, then it means they are not getting an equal opportunity, dipstick&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, they should have an equal opportunity to apply.  Are they not getting it?  How do you know that?  Where is the data that shows (or hell, even hints that it might be the case) that women or minorities are being routinely denied opportunities in education and hiring?

Rather than offer any facts or data, people just say &quot;of course minorities are being denied opportunities because of widespread racism, that&#039;s why we need affirmative action&quot; as if the statement alone is enough.  It&#039;s not.

If people from a disadvantaged &lt;b&gt;economic&lt;/b&gt; background need help in getting an education, they should get it.  If people are denied a job based on their gender or race, there is legal recourse and they deserve to prevail.  Other than that, the world isn&#039;t fair and most of the time you have to work hard to get what you want.

And &quot;dipstick&quot;?  Is that the best you could do, or are you just going easy on me?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It means that women should have an equal opportunity to apply, dipstick. If they are not allowed to, or unable to apply because of their financial situation, or lack of education because they are oppressed, then it means they are not getting an equal opportunity, dipstick</i></p>
<p>Yes, they should have an equal opportunity to apply.  Are they not getting it?  How do you know that?  Where is the data that shows (or hell, even hints that it might be the case) that women or minorities are being routinely denied opportunities in education and hiring?</p>
<p>Rather than offer any facts or data, people just say &#8220;of course minorities are being denied opportunities because of widespread racism, that&#8217;s why we need affirmative action&#8221; as if the statement alone is enough.  It&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>If people from a disadvantaged <b>economic</b> background need help in getting an education, they should get it.  If people are denied a job based on their gender or race, there is legal recourse and they deserve to prevail.  Other than that, the world isn&#8217;t fair and most of the time you have to work hard to get what you want.</p>
<p>And &#8220;dipstick&#8221;?  Is that the best you could do, or are you just going easy on me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19258</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19258</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;LOL! Yeah, when the ratio of applicants = the ratio of population, then you talk, okay?&lt;/i&gt;

What makes you think that people apply to medical school in the same ratios as the population?  What if some people don&#039;t want to be doctors?  Look at frameone&#039;s post above quoting a statistic that &quot;only 12-13 percent of the nation s police officers are women.&quot;  What should the ratio be?  In the 2000 census, women were just over 50% of the population.  Does that mean that 50% of the police force should be female?

When you know what you&#039;re talking about, you talk, okay?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>LOL! Yeah, when the ratio of applicants = the ratio of population, then you talk, okay?</i></p>
<p>What makes you think that people apply to medical school in the same ratios as the population?  What if some people don&#8217;t want to be doctors?  Look at frameone&#8217;s post above quoting a statistic that &#8220;only 12-13 percent of the nation s police officers are women.&#8221;  What should the ratio be?  In the 2000 census, women were just over 50% of the population.  Does that mean that 50% of the police force should be female?</p>
<p>When you know what you&#8217;re talking about, you talk, okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRWC drone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19257</link>
		<dc:creator>VRWC drone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You re not talking about a  culture . You are talking about a few radicals in the culture&lt;/i&gt;

Wrong.  It&#039;s not just a few bad apples... it&#039;s the cultural norm.  Have you ever been to Saudia Arabia?  I have, numerous times.

&lt;i&gt;You are using the worst of the culture to validate your dismissal of the culture&lt;/i&gt;

Again, it&#039;s the cultural norm, not the &quot;worst&quot; of the culture.  And where did I dismiss the culture?  I said I don&#039;t think as highly of it as I do ours.  And my opinion of cultures is based on the values, beliefs and actions that each one embodies, not just some kneejerk &quot;all other cultures are inferior to mine&quot; mentality.  And keep in mind I&#039;m talking about &quot;culture&quot;, not &quot;people&quot;.  When I interact with people in those cultures, I treat them as equal human beings, with decency and respect.  That still doesn&#039;t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own.

&lt;i&gt;That is racist and xenophobic. Sorry. You re a racist.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m racist and xenophobic if I think less of some cultures because of the beliefs and actions that those cultures espouse?  Sorry.  You&#039;re an idiot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You re not talking about a  culture . You are talking about a few radicals in the culture</i></p>
<p>Wrong.  It&#8217;s not just a few bad apples&#8230; it&#8217;s the cultural norm.  Have you ever been to Saudia Arabia?  I have, numerous times.</p>
<p><i>You are using the worst of the culture to validate your dismissal of the culture</i></p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s the cultural norm, not the &#8220;worst&#8221; of the culture.  And where did I dismiss the culture?  I said I don&#8217;t think as highly of it as I do ours.  And my opinion of cultures is based on the values, beliefs and actions that each one embodies, not just some kneejerk &#8220;all other cultures are inferior to mine&#8221; mentality.  And keep in mind I&#8217;m talking about &#8220;culture&#8221;, not &#8220;people&#8221;.  When I interact with people in those cultures, I treat them as equal human beings, with decency and respect.  That still doesn&#8217;t mean I think their culture is 100% equal to my own.</p>
<p><i>That is racist and xenophobic. Sorry. You re a racist.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m racist and xenophobic if I think less of some cultures because of the beliefs and actions that those cultures espouse?  Sorry.  You&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19256</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19256</guid>
		<description>WRWC = &lt;em&gt;When you know what you re talking about, you talk, okay?&lt;/em&gt;

Okay, you got it.
&lt;em&gt;Does that mean that 50% of the police force should be female?&lt;/em&gt;
It means that women should have an equal opportunity to apply, dipstick. If they are not allowed to, or unable to apply because of their financial situation, or lack of education because they are oppressed, then it means they are not getting an equal opportunity, dipstick
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRWC = <em>When you know what you re talking about, you talk, okay?</em></p>
<p>Okay, you got it.<br />
<em>Does that mean that 50% of the police force should be female?</em><br />
It means that women should have an equal opportunity to apply, dipstick. If they are not allowed to, or unable to apply because of their financial situation, or lack of education because they are oppressed, then it means they are not getting an equal opportunity, dipstick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikmik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/01/15/the-right-doesnt-get-dr-king/#comment-19255</link>
		<dc:creator>mikmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1231#comment-19255</guid>
		<description>Blacks and hispanis don t apply to med school in the same ratio that they live in society. What I have demonstrate is that simply by being a  minority  your chances of acceptance are 3 times better than a non-minority&amp; ..even if you are not as strong an applicant based on gpa/mcat.

So far no one has demonstrated any evidence of institutional racism in this society today, in fact, we have proven that because of institutional REVERSE racism,  minorities  have a 3X admission advantage.


LOL! Yeah, when the ratio of applicants = the ratio of population, then you talk, okay?

You sat &quot;&lt;em&gt;we have proven&lt;/em&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blacks and hispanis don t apply to med school in the same ratio that they live in society. What I have demonstrate is that simply by being a  minority  your chances of acceptance are 3 times better than a non-minority&#038; ..even if you are not as strong an applicant based on gpa/mcat.</p>
<p>So far no one has demonstrated any evidence of institutional racism in this society today, in fact, we have proven that because of institutional REVERSE racism,  minorities  have a 3X admission advantage.</p>
<p>LOL! Yeah, when the ratio of applicants = the ratio of population, then you talk, okay?</p>
<p>You sat &#8220;<em>we have proven</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
