it was just about sex (in fact, involving no one else!) so it doesn t really matter, right?

If I may take you at your word, you and I agree on that. Mr. Glavin, however, felt differently…until he was busted twice for public indecency.

Still no cite.
Still no proof.
Insane conspiracy theories on Matt Glavin.
Still MSU.

Holy crap, I didn’t realize that Clinton would be so brazen in his retaliation! I mean, I know about how he used FBI files, and how he ran the travel office out of town. I know how many of his associates and people that were testifying against him died “mysteriously”….but to actually have an undercover federal “park police” ( I didn’t even know they existed) actually frame a guy….that is Chutzpah!

Thanks Quaker, I always thought all those other deaths and such were just coincidence! Now I know better. God help all those poor souls who dig up dirt on hillary!

http://members.tripod.com/Matt_Glavin_Art/

you’re a moron quaker, but you’re OUR moron, and thats why we love you!

{sigh}& ..Citation above,

As before:

No, no, the CNN article doesn t count. The article doesn t contain the word  perjury and it certainly doesn t say Mr. Clinton committed it.

Your quotation from it says that a right-wing legal foundation asked the Arkansas bar to look at Mr. Clinton s conduct. That s not a finding, that s a referral. What did the professional conduct committee conclude, peedro?

Still waiting to see that big  P word somewhere in your cite.

Wrong Matt Glavin…I’m talking about the director of the Southeast Legal Foundation, the outfit you quoted. What ever happened to that guy?

So the score on your assertion that Clinton committed perjury remains:
Still no cite. Still no proof.
Still nothing on Matt Glavin.
Still MSU.

Still no cite. Still no proof.
Still nothing on Matt Glavin.
Still MSU.

No, no, the CNN article doesn t count. The article doesn t contain the word  perjury and it certainly doesn t say Mr. Clinton committed it.

Your quotation from it says that a right-wing legal foundation asked the Arkansas bar to look at Mr. Clinton s conduct. That s not a finding, that s a referral. What did the professional conduct committee conclude, peedro?

Still waiting to see that big  P word somewhere in your cite.

Still no cite. Still no proof.
Still nothing on Matt Glavin.
Still MSU.

That would explain the majorities in the house, senate and white house

And stop trying to use old Media Matters talking points.

It is this disingenous dissembling that americans are really tired of.

Here is a new t-shirt for you

“Democrats: The Antidote for Straight Talk”
You know, put a flag and a donkey next to it…huge hit

It’s not me who’s trying so very hard to change the subject, peed’.

“Perjury” has a specific legal meaning. You still haven’t produced even one cite that supports your fantasy.

That’s because you can’t.

Are we done now?

LOL

“it all depends on what the meaning of is,is”

Doesn’t fly with the average american, no matter how you parse it.

It remains amazing to me though that someone like quaker who at least alludes to being a Quaker would actual back someone like Clinton. After all that talk of bravely staying home for WWII, he is afraid to stand up and call BS on a fast talking used car salesmen with no respect for women….

which is exactly what Judge Wright and a board of attorneys in Arkansas found as well.

Still wrong.

Still no cite.

You’re M.S.U.

Your quotation from it says that a right-wing legal foundation asked the Arkansas bar to look at Mr. Clinton’s conduct. That’s not a finding, that’s a referral. What did the professional conduct committee conclude, peedro?

Still waiting to see that big “P” word somewhere in your cite.

Whatever happened to that guy?