<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Brave New America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15945</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15945</guid>
		<description>Who do suppose advised Bush to approve the illegal spying? Gonzalez? Ashcroft? With attorneys like them who needs dictators?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do suppose advised Bush to approve the illegal spying? Gonzalez? Ashcroft? With attorneys like them who needs dictators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15944</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15944</guid>
		<description>Washington Monthly has a good post fleshing out why these activities are illegal.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Monthly has a good post fleshing out why these activities are illegal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_12/007789.php#more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: begoniabuzzkill</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15943</link>
		<dc:creator>begoniabuzzkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15943</guid>
		<description>During the confirmation hearings of John Bolton as the U.S. representative to the United Nations, it came to light that the NSA had freely revealed intercepted conversations of U.S. citizens to Bolton while he served at the State Department. . . .

Newsweek reported  January 2004 to May 2005, the NSA supplied intercepts and names of 10,000 U.S. citizens to policy-makers at many departments, other U.S. intelligence services, and law enforcement agencies.&quot;

This could explain why the Bush Administration fought so strenuously to keep those intercepts secret and out of the hearing.  Snooping without judicial review illegal and THEY KNOW IT.

Bush&#039;s signing the order to allow this kind of domestic spying without warrant is an impeachable offense. This President swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. The fourth amendment clearly prohibits this kind of warrantless search.

The President has therefore violated his oath of office.
all those who obeyed the president&#039;s unlawful order be prosecuted.

Happy Critical Thinking Holiday!

Be nice to America or Republicans will bring democracy to your country
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the confirmation hearings of John Bolton as the U.S. representative to the United Nations, it came to light that the NSA had freely revealed intercepted conversations of U.S. citizens to Bolton while he served at the State Department. . . .</p>
<p>Newsweek reported  January 2004 to May 2005, the NSA supplied intercepts and names of 10,000 U.S. citizens to policy-makers at many departments, other U.S. intelligence services, and law enforcement agencies.&#8221;</p>
<p>This could explain why the Bush Administration fought so strenuously to keep those intercepts secret and out of the hearing.  Snooping without judicial review illegal and THEY KNOW IT.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s signing the order to allow this kind of domestic spying without warrant is an impeachable offense. This President swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. The fourth amendment clearly prohibits this kind of warrantless search.</p>
<p>The President has therefore violated his oath of office.<br />
all those who obeyed the president&#8217;s unlawful order be prosecuted.</p>
<p>Happy Critical Thinking Holiday!</p>
<p>Be nice to America or Republicans will bring democracy to your country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpedro</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15942</link>
		<dc:creator>drpedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15942</guid>
		<description>hehehehe....I love it when people like semanticleo say

&quot;Tongue-in-cheek is your intent. However I have indirect experience with just such a threat&quot;

It reminds me of the conspiracy theorist that used to speak on college campuses.  They would tell you how bad the cia is, how they kill people that speak out....all while playing to a standing room audience at colleges around the country!  LOL

They hated it when I would get up and ask them &quot;Why aren&#039;t you dead yet?&quot;

so Cleo, why aren&#039;t you dead yet?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehehehe&#8230;.I love it when people like semanticleo say</p>
<p>&#8220;Tongue-in-cheek is your intent. However I have indirect experience with just such a threat&#8221;</p>
<p>It reminds me of the conspiracy theorist that used to speak on college campuses.  They would tell you how bad the cia is, how they kill people that speak out&#8230;.all while playing to a standing room audience at colleges around the country!  LOL</p>
<p>They hated it when I would get up and ask them &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t you dead yet?&#8221;</p>
<p>so Cleo, why aren&#8217;t you dead yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15941</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15941</guid>
		<description>No surprise that once again Dugger comes down on the side of police state tactics. Win at all costs but lose everything that makes us American? Dugger says yes. Screw the Consitution and the balance of powers. Duger just wants to save is craven skin.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise that once again Dugger comes down on the side of police state tactics. Win at all costs but lose everything that makes us American? Dugger says yes. Screw the Consitution and the balance of powers. Duger just wants to save is craven skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15940</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15940</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Again, my position is that you cannot be  win at all costs  and  morality and ethics  at the same time. &lt;/i&gt;

True. Anybody who&#039;s seen an episode of &lt;i&gt;Survivor&lt;/i&gt; knows that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Again, my position is that you cannot be  win at all costs  and  morality and ethics  at the same time. </i></p>
<p>True. Anybody who&#8217;s seen an episode of <i>Survivor</i> knows that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15939</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15939</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; win at all costs ?? Is it really that bad?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I never said it was bad. I said it is not consistent with claiming to be all about morality and values.

If you want the Republicans to be about &quot;win at all costs&quot;, then at least be honest with folks about what the intentions of the party really are.

Again, my position is that you cannot be &quot;win at all costs&quot; and &quot;morality and ethics&quot; at the same time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> win at all costs ?? Is it really that bad?</p></blockquote>
<p>I never said it was bad. I said it is not consistent with claiming to be all about morality and values.</p>
<p>If you want the Republicans to be about &#8220;win at all costs&#8221;, then at least be honest with folks about what the intentions of the party really are.</p>
<p>Again, my position is that you cannot be &#8220;win at all costs&#8221; and &#8220;morality and ethics&#8221; at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainlion</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15938</link>
		<dc:creator>rainlion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15938</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well it was legal&quot;

Sorry Dugger... that&#039;s the problem, the legality is in question.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well it was legal&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry Dugger&#8230; that&#8217;s the problem, the legality is in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15937</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15937</guid>
		<description>Agent Dugger (I think I put them off the track, Mr Rove, but some of these guys may need to be monitored via NSA and then  gitmoed )

Tongue-in-cheek is your intent.  However I have indirect experience with just such a threat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agent Dugger (I think I put them off the track, Mr Rove, but some of these guys may need to be monitored via NSA and then  gitmoed )</p>
<p>Tongue-in-cheek is your intent.  However I have indirect experience with just such a threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15936</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15936</guid>
		<description>Oh, by the by, chirrens, stop digging your tinfoil shelters and stockpiling that instant latte for a second.  Read this:

&quot;The Foreign Intelligence Security Act permits the government to monitor foreign communications, even if they are with U.S. citizens -- 50 USC 1801, et seq. A FISA warrant is only needed if the subject communications are wholly contained in the United States and involve a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. &quot;

Now back to it.  Put the brie in the cooler.  And better get more Birkenstocks hidden in that shelter.  The fascists will steal those.

Knock! Knock!  Its NSA Dugger, &quot;He knows when you are sleeping, he knows when you are awake, he knows when you been progressive, so be conservative for goodness sake!!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, by the by, chirrens, stop digging your tinfoil shelters and stockpiling that instant latte for a second.  Read this:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Foreign Intelligence Security Act permits the government to monitor foreign communications, even if they are with U.S. citizens &#8212; 50 USC 1801, et seq. A FISA warrant is only needed if the subject communications are wholly contained in the United States and involve a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. &#8221;</p>
<p>Now back to it.  Put the brie in the cooler.  And better get more Birkenstocks hidden in that shelter.  The fascists will steal those.</p>
<p>Knock! Knock!  Its NSA Dugger, &#8220;He knows when you are sleeping, he knows when you are awake, he knows when you been progressive, so be conservative for goodness sake!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15935</guid>
		<description>John S,

&quot;win at all costs&quot;??  Is it really that bad?  Armegeddon is now upon this, courtesy of Bushellzzabub.  All those poor hippies being rounded up and put in Abu Ghraib.  NSA monitors a few ingoing and outgoing foreign calls and its &quot;oh the humanity&quot;.

Agent Dugger (I think I put them off the track, Mr Rove, but some of these guys may need to be monitored via NSA and then &quot;gitmoed&quot;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John S,</p>
<p>&#8220;win at all costs&#8221;??  Is it really that bad?  Armegeddon is now upon this, courtesy of Bushellzzabub.  All those poor hippies being rounded up and put in Abu Ghraib.  NSA monitors a few ingoing and outgoing foreign calls and its &#8220;oh the humanity&#8221;.</p>
<p>Agent Dugger (I think I put them off the track, Mr Rove, but some of these guys may need to be monitored via NSA and then &#8220;gitmoed&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15934</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15934</guid>
		<description>I think we need to prosecute whoever leaked this to the NYT.  I nominate Fitzgerald...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to prosecute whoever leaked this to the NYT.  I nominate Fitzgerald&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15933</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15933</guid>
		<description>No warrrant = not legal.

But it&#039;s OK because Dugger says so.  Ol&#039; warm and fuzzy Dugger. At this point, there isn&#039;t a thing that comes from Dugger that I believe should be taken seriously on this blog.  Not a thing.

In a post 9/11 world, we have to cut the government some slack....they&#039;re trying to prevent another 9/11....but this one is beyond the pale. There was  even enough concern about the legaility that some NSA officials were refusing to participate.

Conservatives are about &quot;less government.&quot; Right? Ya....right.

JK
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No warrrant = not legal.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s OK because Dugger says so.  Ol&#8217; warm and fuzzy Dugger. At this point, there isn&#8217;t a thing that comes from Dugger that I believe should be taken seriously on this blog.  Not a thing.</p>
<p>In a post 9/11 world, we have to cut the government some slack&#8230;.they&#8217;re trying to prevent another 9/11&#8230;.but this one is beyond the pale. There was  even enough concern about the legaility that some NSA officials were refusing to participate.</p>
<p>Conservatives are about &#8220;less government.&#8221; Right? Ya&#8230;.right.</p>
<p>JK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15932</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15932</guid>
		<description>No president, Democrat or Republican, should have these powers. It&#039;s not American, and it&#039;s not legal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No president, Democrat or Republican, should have these powers. It&#8217;s not American, and it&#8217;s not legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellulose</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15931</link>
		<dc:creator>cellulose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15931</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hooray, no terrorists attacks on US soil since 9-11!&quot; says the man in a room filled with cameras and tape recorders.

I wonder what the Ministry of Peace would say about this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hooray, no terrorists attacks on US soil since 9-11!&#8221; says the man in a room filled with cameras and tape recorders.</p>
<p>I wonder what the Ministry of Peace would say about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15930</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15930</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well it was legal and we have had no successful terrorists attacks on our soil since 9-11. So progressives want to undo that?

Dugger, These are tough times. Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If this attitude is representative of Republicans, then you need to change your sloganeering.

The above view does not reflect the party of &quot;morals and ethics&quot;. It represents the party of &quot;win at all costs&quot;. Since these concepts are mutually exclusive, you had better pick one and run with it. Otherwise, all the other hyperbole is bullshit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well it was legal and we have had no successful terrorists attacks on our soil since 9-11. So progressives want to undo that?</p>
<p>Dugger, These are tough times. Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.</p></blockquote>
<p>If this attitude is representative of Republicans, then you need to change your sloganeering.</p>
<p>The above view does not reflect the party of &#8220;morals and ethics&#8221;. It represents the party of &#8220;win at all costs&#8221;. Since these concepts are mutually exclusive, you had better pick one and run with it. Otherwise, all the other hyperbole is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15929</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15929</guid>
		<description>Well it was legal and we have had no successful terrorists attacks on our soil since 9-11.  So progressives want to undo that?

Dugger, These are tough times. Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it was legal and we have had no successful terrorists attacks on our soil since 9-11.  So progressives want to undo that?</p>
<p>Dugger, These are tough times. Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog » This Way to the Gulags II</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/16/our-brave-new-america/#comment-15928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog » This Way to the Gulags II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1104#comment-15928</guid>
		<description>[...]  know what was going on,  he said. 	This is the path to totalitarianism, you know.  	Oliver Willis writes, 	There are going to be some folks who say  no big deal ,  [...]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  know what was going on,  he said. 	This is the path to totalitarianism, you know.  	Oliver Willis writes, 	There are going to be some folks who say  no big deal ,  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
