I already told you, I don’t have a thing against you – it’s your comments that I find to be incredibly partisan and shrill. I don’t have a problem with conservative points of view, as long as they are articulated in an articulate fashion. People like you, Ian and Jay Caruso only know how to do one thing around places like this: Score cheap talking points with insults and zingers.

The day you start making posts that actually have some substance worth addressing, I’d be more than happy to engage in a reasonable debate. As long as you persist in waving around that red falg of yours, don’t be surprised when you get the horns. Since you seem to prefer the horns, I can only suggest that you get a thicker skin.

John S. You can’t be stupid enough to be laughing, can you? You must be high.
Put that crack pipe down, before you burn your lips.

I don’t why you’re behaving like this, John S. After all, I’m not the who cut in front of you on line for the Partridge Family concert. That was someone who looked like me. And I didn’t run over your pet Yorkie, that was my cousin Charlie. He looks very little like me, and he has less hair.
So what have you got against me? You arrived on this blog, what, a week or so ago, and you came out swinging — at me. No one but me.

So, what’s it all about, John?

C’mon, ‘fess up, you’ll feel better.

And. incidentally, my question, “John S. what is your problem?”, doesn’t require translation. In fact, judging by your stupid response, it no longer requires an answer. You’re just an asshole.

John S. What is your problem?

Translation: Waaaa! Leave me alone.

Sorry, Frank, when you make moronic comments, I will take them to task.

Do you have a comment to make regarding this post?

Funny, my comment was nearly identical to yours (merely substituted conservative for liberal in your rant). So I guess you admit that you like to post irrelevant comments that have nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

Thanks for the insight.

Dugger Dzugashvilli

It was Clinton’s eight years that pulled the Republicans toward the center to win in 2000, 2002, and 2004. Now you want to head further towards the left to win back the White House? How in the world could that work?

Also, by the way, what you call a rightward sprint took about 40 years.

The DLC is the Democrats’ last, best hope. If the Democrats stay situated on the far left, they will only see the rest of the country running off into the sunset.

Citizen Dugger, Senator Lieberman meet Mdse. Guillotine

Paul Weyrich calls them liberal republicans, but I wouldn’t go that far. But moderate, definitely.

What? That wasn’t Democrats? Never mind.

Adding on GW Bush’s votes for 2004
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/president/

Puts him right alongside Richard Nixon, who is No. 1, on the list.

And that doesn’t include Congressional victories, Gubernatorial victories and State legislatures.

And, oh, I’m not your fucking “buddy.”

Please stick to the subject in the future, and we can avoid these unpleasantries.

And save the “theocratic autocracy” for your buddies on the left. They might buy it.