<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Vote Pro-Corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:09:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/#comment-15003</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1049#comment-15003</guid>
		<description>Voting against a bill that was there to make them look like asses .. gee, what a surprise. Democrats are the minority, and after five years I still don&#039;t think they&#039;ve read the memo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voting against a bill that was there to make them look like asses .. gee, what a surprise. Democrats are the minority, and after five years I still don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ve read the memo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Concordian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/#comment-15002</link>
		<dc:creator>The Concordian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1049#comment-15002</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Democrats to practice their patented compassionate Christianity&lt;/i&gt;

Ummm, not to burst your bubble, but I believe it&#039;s the Republicans who have been trying to claim ownership of that particular meme.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Democrats to practice their patented compassionate Christianity</i></p>
<p>Ummm, not to burst your bubble, but I believe it&#8217;s the Republicans who have been trying to claim ownership of that particular meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/#comment-15001</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1049#comment-15001</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that if the Republicans had proposed such a resolution after the House Bank scandal, the Democrats would have soundly rejected it, too.

Pelosi is also an odd choice to sponsor this kind of resolution, since &lt;a&gt;it was recently reported&lt;/a&gt; that two PACS tied to her (the same way that Texans for a Republican Majority was tied to Tom Delay) paid $21,000 in fines for circumventing donation limits set in election law.  This is kind of like Dick Gephardt grandstanding about Newt Gingrich&#039;s &quot;ethics violations&quot; 8 years ago, when he himself was under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for income tax evasion.

It looks to me like this is a good chance for Democrats to practice their patented compassionate Christianity and start living out Jesus&#039; teaching about throwing the first stone.  :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that if the Republicans had proposed such a resolution after the House Bank scandal, the Democrats would have soundly rejected it, too.</p>
<p>Pelosi is also an odd choice to sponsor this kind of resolution, since <a>it was recently reported</a> that two PACS tied to her (the same way that Texans for a Republican Majority was tied to Tom Delay) paid $21,000 in fines for circumventing donation limits set in election law.  This is kind of like Dick Gephardt grandstanding about Newt Gingrich&#8217;s &#8220;ethics violations&#8221; 8 years ago, when he himself was under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for income tax evasion.</p>
<p>It looks to me like this is a good chance for Democrats to practice their patented compassionate Christianity and start living out Jesus&#8217; teaching about throwing the first stone.  <img src='http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Concordian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/#comment-15000</link>
		<dc:creator>The Concordian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1049#comment-15000</guid>
		<description>Yeah, my thought exactly. If you&#039;re going to grandstand, then there had better be a reason for it, a point you&#039;re trying to make, or something you&#039;re trying to accomplish. There was nothing behind this crap but snark.

I think the number of Republicans and party operatives/cronies facing investigation and/or prosecution is a pretty clear indicator of the level of Republican corruption in Washington. Pelosi should know better than to waste more time on this kind of thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, my thought exactly. If you&#8217;re going to grandstand, then there had better be a reason for it, a point you&#8217;re trying to make, or something you&#8217;re trying to accomplish. There was nothing behind this crap but snark.</p>
<p>I think the number of Republicans and party operatives/cronies facing investigation and/or prosecution is a pretty clear indicator of the level of Republican corruption in Washington. Pelosi should know better than to waste more time on this kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrod</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/12/08/republicans-vote-pro-corruption/#comment-14999</link>
		<dc:creator>elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 05:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1049#comment-14999</guid>
		<description>Well, considering the bill specifically cited the Republican leadership&#039;s corruption, is it surprising that Republicans would vote against it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, considering the bill specifically cited the Republican leadership&#8217;s corruption, is it surprising that Republicans would vote against it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
