<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right vs. The Champ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:42:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ebdrgksoa fszowne</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>ebdrgksoa fszowne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>ohgrxyt nmujgtexf mpbutsfhj jrwutas kbxa apyow qikos
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohgrxyt nmujgtexf mpbutsfhj jrwutas kbxa apyow qikos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebdrgksoa fszowne</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14175</link>
		<dc:creator>ebdrgksoa fszowne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14175</guid>
		<description>ohgrxyt nmujgtexf mpbutsfhj jrwutas kbxa apyow qikos
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohgrxyt nmujgtexf mpbutsfhj jrwutas kbxa apyow qikos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>OK.

I was taking issue with your charge that he &quot;shirked his duty.&quot; In my way of looking at it, his obligation is defined by law, not by Dugger. Feel free to disagree, but in doing so, realize that you substitute your own judgment for the law when it comes to determining what constitutes a citizen&#039;s &quot;duty.&quot;

My question about respect for the rule of law followed from that premise.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.</p>
<p>I was taking issue with your charge that he &#8220;shirked his duty.&#8221; In my way of looking at it, his obligation is defined by law, not by Dugger. Feel free to disagree, but in doing so, realize that you substitute your own judgment for the law when it comes to determining what constitutes a citizen&#8217;s &#8220;duty.&#8221;</p>
<p>My question about respect for the rule of law followed from that premise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>My opinion.  We live in a democratic society.  We have a representative government.  To maintain that government requires the support and efforts of its citizenry: including serving that country in its armed forces - even if you don&#039;t agree with what is being done.  A &#039;democracy&#039; ultimately, IMO,  will not work if citizens are allowed to pick and choose the laws they want to obey and the duties they want to perform.  I call that a duty: you may not want to do it, you may not like doing it, you may disagree with doing it, but you do it  - the higher -the highest- principal beeing democratic service.  I don&#039;t regard the individual who, when his time comes,  says, &quot;no because of my own selfish beliefs, I will not join the armed force and serve along with other citizens&quot; as being worthy of a national medal.  Give him a millionaire&#039;s boxer medal or something, but not one for service to his country.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion.  We live in a democratic society.  We have a representative government.  To maintain that government requires the support and efforts of its citizenry: including serving that country in its armed forces &#8211; even if you don&#8217;t agree with what is being done.  A &#8216;democracy&#8217; ultimately, IMO,  will not work if citizens are allowed to pick and choose the laws they want to obey and the duties they want to perform.  I call that a duty: you may not want to do it, you may not like doing it, you may disagree with doing it, but you do it  &#8211; the higher -the highest- principal beeing democratic service.  I don&#8217;t regard the individual who, when his time comes,  says, &#8220;no because of my own selfish beliefs, I will not join the armed force and serve along with other citizens&#8221; as being worthy of a national medal.  Give him a millionaire&#8217;s boxer medal or something, but not one for service to his country.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14172</guid>
		<description>Why don t you respect the rule of law, Dugger?

But I do.  I haven&#039;t called for Ali&#039;s millionaire b*tt to be thrown in jail.  I acknowledge that he was able, via legal means, to avoid serving his country.  But his not serving is enough in my book to warrant no national medals.  Save it for somebody who served his country.  Ali can salve his &#039;moral&#039; wounds with his lucre - lucre he was able to win because, partially, the sons and daughters of others served when and where he didn&#039;t.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don t you respect the rule of law, Dugger?</p>
<p>But I do.  I haven&#8217;t called for Ali&#8217;s millionaire b*tt to be thrown in jail.  I acknowledge that he was able, via legal means, to avoid serving his country.  But his not serving is enough in my book to warrant no national medals.  Save it for somebody who served his country.  Ali can salve his &#8216;moral&#8217; wounds with his lucre &#8211; lucre he was able to win because, partially, the sons and daughters of others served when and where he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSU94</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14171</link>
		<dc:creator>PSU94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14171</guid>
		<description>As I said above, I think Ali is a scumbag personally and it has nothing to do with him not serving.  I don&#039;t totally agree with Dugger in this case. If Ali was against the war and followed the law to get out of it, that&#039;s his right.

That being said, when ESPN did their list of the 100 greatest athletes, it is rather telling that one of the reasons he ranked as high as he did had a lot do with what he did out of the ring.  Most boxing experts will tell you that, if they fought when both were in their primes, Joe Louis would&#039;ve cleaned Ali&#039;s clock.

The point being,  people talk about how great Ali would&#039;ve been had he not had to take that time out of the ring, and automatically bump as his stature as a result.

I don&#039;t usually see Ted Williams being bumped up on all these &quot;greatest&quot; lists, even though he missed some prime years because he DID serve during WWII and Korea.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said above, I think Ali is a scumbag personally and it has nothing to do with him not serving.  I don&#8217;t totally agree with Dugger in this case. If Ali was against the war and followed the law to get out of it, that&#8217;s his right.</p>
<p>That being said, when ESPN did their list of the 100 greatest athletes, it is rather telling that one of the reasons he ranked as high as he did had a lot do with what he did out of the ring.  Most boxing experts will tell you that, if they fought when both were in their primes, Joe Louis would&#8217;ve cleaned Ali&#8217;s clock.</p>
<p>The point being,  people talk about how great Ali would&#8217;ve been had he not had to take that time out of the ring, and automatically bump as his stature as a result.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t usually see Ted Williams being bumped up on all these &#8220;greatest&#8221; lists, even though he missed some prime years because he DID serve during WWII and Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14170</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14170</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I acknowledge that he was able, via legal means, to avoid serving his country.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And you allege that he &quot;shirked his duty.&quot; What defines his duty? The law? Or Dugger&#039;s proclamation?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I acknowledge that he was able, via legal means, to avoid serving his country.</p></blockquote>
<p>And you allege that he &#8220;shirked his duty.&#8221; What defines his duty? The law? Or Dugger&#8217;s proclamation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sooperedd</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>sooperedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>The Guard was how you ducked Vietnam...period. Rich kids don&#039;t go in the military and they don&#039;t die. Proudly served &#039;85-&#039;88 and the Gulf War, did not run into any millionares nor their kids. Rich folks start the wars and the poor folks die in them, crack a history book.

Why didn&#039;t Bush volunteer for Vietnam if he was such a great fighter pilot?

Bush was AWOL, disgraced the uniform and all those that wore it, but plenty of people voted for him anyway while smearing Kerry, a true American.

Just like they are trying to do to Murtha.

Bunch of candy asses.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guard was how you ducked Vietnam&#8230;period. Rich kids don&#8217;t go in the military and they don&#8217;t die. Proudly served &#8216;85-&#8217;88 and the Gulf War, did not run into any millionares nor their kids. Rich folks start the wars and the poor folks die in them, crack a history book.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t Bush volunteer for Vietnam if he was such a great fighter pilot?</p>
<p>Bush was AWOL, disgraced the uniform and all those that wore it, but plenty of people voted for him anyway while smearing Kerry, a true American.</p>
<p>Just like they are trying to do to Murtha.</p>
<p>Bunch of candy asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14168</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14168</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When Ali s time came to do his duty he shirked it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

When Ali&#039;s time came, he followed the law. He filed as a conscientious objector and when his application was denied, he filed an appeal.

The United States Department of Justice, however, singled him out to make an example of him. The DOJ sent a letter directly to Ali&#039;s draft board, asking them to deny his appeal. They did so.

Ali took his appeal all the way to the Supreme Court which found &lt;i&gt;unanimously&lt;/i&gt; in his favor.

Why don&#039;t you respect the rule of law, Dugger?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When Ali s time came to do his duty he shirked it. </p></blockquote>
<p>When Ali&#8217;s time came, he followed the law. He filed as a conscientious objector and when his application was denied, he filed an appeal.</p>
<p>The United States Department of Justice, however, singled him out to make an example of him. The DOJ sent a letter directly to Ali&#8217;s draft board, asking them to deny his appeal. They did so.</p>
<p>Ali took his appeal all the way to the Supreme Court which found <i>unanimously</i> in his favor.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you respect the rule of law, Dugger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14167</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 22:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14167</guid>
		<description>Frank D. I think I admire Ali even more for not entering the Armed Forces knowing he wouldn&#039;t have to fight. He could have decided not to rock the boat and just get put on an Armed Forces boxing team. He would have had cake duty, but he decided that he wasn&#039;t going to support a country where he was treated as a second class citizen fighting a war he believed was wrong.
JWG- when you say you may want to review your history, you may be literally right, i.e. he may have been able to vote and sit in the front of the bus (I&#039;m a little less clear on being able to go in the front door), but the soopered&#039;s larger point is substantially right. African-Americans were very much second class citizens at the time. As he said, &quot;no vietcong ever called me nigger.&quot;
cybishop-Clinton was the one who ignored the Rwandan massacre.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank D. I think I admire Ali even more for not entering the Armed Forces knowing he wouldn&#8217;t have to fight. He could have decided not to rock the boat and just get put on an Armed Forces boxing team. He would have had cake duty, but he decided that he wasn&#8217;t going to support a country where he was treated as a second class citizen fighting a war he believed was wrong.<br />
JWG- when you say you may want to review your history, you may be literally right, i.e. he may have been able to vote and sit in the front of the bus (I&#8217;m a little less clear on being able to go in the front door), but the soopered&#8217;s larger point is substantially right. African-Americans were very much second class citizens at the time. As he said, &#8220;no vietcong ever called me nigger.&#8221;<br />
cybishop-Clinton was the one who ignored the Rwandan massacre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14166</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14166</guid>
		<description>musclehead,

Hope your blog is better than your reasoning here. Bush served in the Guard.  Flew fighters.  That is service period.  They were rather dangerous fighters to just fly BTW.  He easily could have been sent overseas. He did much, much more than  Ali.  But the topic was about Ali.  Why didn&#039;t you pick Clinton as an example of a president who ordred troops into combat and didn&#039;t serve?

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>musclehead,</p>
<p>Hope your blog is better than your reasoning here. Bush served in the Guard.  Flew fighters.  That is service period.  They were rather dangerous fighters to just fly BTW.  He easily could have been sent overseas. He did much, much more than  Ali.  But the topic was about Ali.  Why didn&#8217;t you pick Clinton as an example of a president who ordred troops into combat and didn&#8217;t serve?</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14165</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14165</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

This is a democracy.  Everybody should serve and IMO, the individual should not be able to pick and choose which wars he will or won&#039;t fight in.  If I were God/president, everybody would serve 2 years in the military or four years of public service (military more dangerous, harder).  Everybody.  But then I would never get elected.


Dugger,

WE live in a democracy. When Ali&#039;s time came to do his duty he shirked it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>This is a democracy.  Everybody should serve and IMO, the individual should not be able to pick and choose which wars he will or won&#8217;t fight in.  If I were God/president, everybody would serve 2 years in the military or four years of public service (military more dangerous, harder).  Everybody.  But then I would never get elected.</p>
<p>Dugger,</p>
<p>WE live in a democracy. When Ali&#8217;s time came to do his duty he shirked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14164</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14164</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the so - called religious beliefs of a  religion  invented by an ex - convict in Detroit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Isn&#039;t that nice?

If I recall, all of Christianity devolves from the teachings of a &quot;convict.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the so &#8211; called religious beliefs of a  religion  invented by an ex &#8211; convict in Detroit.</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that nice?</p>
<p>If I recall, all of Christianity devolves from the teachings of a &#8220;convict.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14163</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14163</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He almost went to jail; only his celebrity saved him. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you tell these whoppers reflexively, or do you have to think about &#039;em?

His celebrity &lt;i&gt;and a unanimous Supreme Court decision&lt;/i&gt; allowed Mr. Ali to win conscientious objector status from his draft board. His application for objector status was initially denied because the United States Department of Justice intervened in his appeal to his draft board.

Why did the DOJ find his case to be worthy of intervention? I&#039;d argue that it was because of his visibility as heavyweight champion and the celebrity that went with his achievements. In short, he didn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;escape&lt;/i&gt; prison because of his celebrity, he was &lt;i&gt;sentenced&lt;/i&gt; because of it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He almost went to jail; only his celebrity saved him. </p></blockquote>
<p>Do you tell these whoppers reflexively, or do you have to think about &#8216;em?</p>
<p>His celebrity <i>and a unanimous Supreme Court decision</i> allowed Mr. Ali to win conscientious objector status from his draft board. His application for objector status was initially denied because the United States Department of Justice intervened in his appeal to his draft board.</p>
<p>Why did the DOJ find his case to be worthy of intervention? I&#8217;d argue that it was because of his visibility as heavyweight champion and the celebrity that went with his achievements. In short, he didn&#8217;t <i>escape</i> prison because of his celebrity, he was <i>sentenced</i> because of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14162</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14162</guid>
		<description>Cassius Clay was manipulated by Elijah Muhammed into changing his name, and refusing to answer the call to the draft. I remember it well. You only have a &quot;historical recollection.&quot;

He  almost went to jail; only his celebrity saved him. He had the opportunity to box in Special Services, but he refused that also. So he didn&#039;t just refuse to &quot;participate in what he believed was an immoral war,&quot; he refused to enter the Armed Forces, because of the so - called religious beliefs of a &quot;religion&quot; invented by an ex - convict in Detroit.

Great boxer -- yes. Inspirational sports figure -- yes.  Great American -- not hardly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassius Clay was manipulated by Elijah Muhammed into changing his name, and refusing to answer the call to the draft. I remember it well. You only have a &#8220;historical recollection.&#8221;</p>
<p>He  almost went to jail; only his celebrity saved him. He had the opportunity to box in Special Services, but he refused that also. So he didn&#8217;t just refuse to &#8220;participate in what he believed was an immoral war,&#8221; he refused to enter the Armed Forces, because of the so &#8211; called religious beliefs of a &#8220;religion&#8221; invented by an ex &#8211; convict in Detroit.</p>
<p>Great boxer &#8212; yes. Inspirational sports figure &#8212; yes.  Great American &#8212; not hardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna in Cairo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna in Cairo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14161</guid>
		<description>Whoever said that teh Muslim Brotherhood, which is an Egyptian political organization founded by Hassan El Banna at the turn of the century, is equivalent to Zawahiri et al, is insane.  And this document is a piece of crap forgery.  The MB does not call for the return of a caliphate.  the Egyptian MB has a platform - which is full of fuzzy talk about progress and stuff.  They just won 76 seats in Parliament.  They are not Al Qaida.

I am against religious parties and would be very unhappy if the MB came to power here in Egypt but to equate them with Al Qaida is completely inane.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever said that teh Muslim Brotherhood, which is an Egyptian political organization founded by Hassan El Banna at the turn of the century, is equivalent to Zawahiri et al, is insane.  And this document is a piece of crap forgery.  The MB does not call for the return of a caliphate.  the Egyptian MB has a platform &#8211; which is full of fuzzy talk about progress and stuff.  They just won 76 seats in Parliament.  They are not Al Qaida.</p>
<p>I am against religious parties and would be very unhappy if the MB came to power here in Egypt but to equate them with Al Qaida is completely inane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14160</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14160</guid>
		<description>Serve your country by participating in what you believe is an immoral war? There&#039;s no patriotism in that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serve your country by participating in what you believe is an immoral war? There&#8217;s no patriotism in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muscleheadblog</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14159</link>
		<dc:creator>muscleheadblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 04:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14159</guid>
		<description>Hey Dugger.. call me crazy, but your boy George didn&#039;t serve when his time came, either.
Perhaps what you meant to say was-
Who&#039;s the bigger hero: the poor kid who serves his country by doing his patriotic duty (chore), serving in a democracy&#039;s armed services, or a dopey, cokehead, millionaire, failed businessman, drunk driver who went to Alabama to play volleyball with ambitious secretaries? (or, maybe you meant to say something about the guy who got five deferments in order not to serve, all because he had &quot;other priorities.&quot;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dugger.. call me crazy, but your boy George didn&#8217;t serve when his time came, either.<br />
Perhaps what you meant to say was-<br />
Who&#8217;s the bigger hero: the poor kid who serves his country by doing his patriotic duty (chore), serving in a democracy&#8217;s armed services, or a dopey, cokehead, millionaire, failed businessman, drunk driver who went to Alabama to play volleyball with ambitious secretaries? (or, maybe you meant to say something about the guy who got five deferments in order not to serve, all because he had &#8220;other priorities.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14158</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14158</guid>
		<description>Count me as one who believes the medal inappropriate for Ali.  He didn&#039;t serve when his time came.  You can do that in this country and become an adored public figure.  But don&#039;t mistake that popular adulation for real service to freedom. Who&#039;s tthe bigger hero:  the poor kid who serves his country by doing his patriotic chore, serving an a democracy&#039;s armed services, or a charismatic millionaire boxer who didn&#039;t.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me as one who believes the medal inappropriate for Ali.  He didn&#8217;t serve when his time came.  You can do that in this country and become an adored public figure.  But don&#8217;t mistake that popular adulation for real service to freedom. Who&#8217;s tthe bigger hero:  the poor kid who serves his country by doing his patriotic chore, serving an a democracy&#8217;s armed services, or a charismatic millionaire boxer who didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nudnik</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/30/the-right-vs-the-champ/#comment-14157</link>
		<dc:creator>nudnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=1000#comment-14157</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Three psychotic radicals does not a worldwide conspiracy make.&lt;/i&gt;

They may be 3 psychotics, but they have tremendous support in the Muslim world.  Just look at the polls coming out of the Middle East.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Three psychotic radicals does not a worldwide conspiracy make.</i></p>
<p>They may be 3 psychotics, but they have tremendous support in the Muslim world.  Just look at the polls coming out of the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
