<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Slow President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BTW,  stubborn  can be viewed as either a positive or negative quality...&lt;/i&gt;

And the evidence suggests that a rapidly growing number of Americans view it as a negative quality in the case of Bush.

I never denied that JD's point was trivially correct.  That's all you Bushbots have left in support of this failed regime:  trivialities and technicalities.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BTW,  stubborn  can be viewed as either a positive or negative quality&#8230;</i></p>
<p>And the evidence suggests that a rapidly growing number of Americans view it as a negative quality in the case of Bush.</p>
<p>I never denied that JD&#8217;s point was trivially correct.  That&#8217;s all you Bushbots have left in support of this failed regime:  trivialities and technicalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14090</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14090</guid>
		<description>No one denies that Bush has low poll numbers in a number of areas. However, JD's comment is supported by the evidence as defined by rhys.

BTW, "stubborn" can be viewed as either a positive or negative quality depending on the situation, so I'm not sure what it has to do with your argument.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one denies that Bush has low poll numbers in a number of areas. However, JD&#8217;s comment is supported by the evidence as defined by rhys.</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;stubborn&#8221; can be viewed as either a positive or negative quality depending on the situation, so I&#8217;m not sure what it has to do with your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14089</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14089</guid>
		<description>PS:  The article claims that a "majority" rank Bush as "strong and decisive" without giving the figures for it.  It does say this, however...

"Eighty-two percent of those polled describe Bush as "stubborn," with seven of every 10 Republicans agreeing with that description."
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS:  The article claims that a &#8220;majority&#8221; rank Bush as &#8220;strong and decisive&#8221; without giving the figures for it.  It does say this, however&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Eighty-two percent of those polled describe Bush as &#8220;stubborn,&#8221; with seven of every 10 Republicans agreeing with that description.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14088</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14088</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out that poll, JWG.  Lessee....

-37% approve of the job he is doing as president,
-"almost six in ten now say Bush is not honest"
-"a similar number say his administration does not have high ethical standards"
-"56% disapprove of the way Bush is handling foreign policy and the war on terrorism"

But you're right: a majority (52%, a slim majority) view Bush as "likable"

But....

that figure has &lt;b&gt;dropped&lt;/b&gt; (plummeted, one might say) &lt;b&gt;from 63% in August&lt;/b&gt;.

Americans are generous; they like to think well of other people... until the evidence to the contrary just becomes overwhelming.

In the case of Bush, it's becoming more overwhelming every day.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out that poll, JWG.  Lessee&#8230;.</p>
<p>-37% approve of the job he is doing as president,<br />
-&#8221;almost six in ten now say Bush is not honest&#8221;<br />
-&#8221;a similar number say his administration does not have high ethical standards&#8221;<br />
-&#8221;56% disapprove of the way Bush is handling foreign policy and the war on terrorism&#8221;</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right: a majority (52%, a slim majority) view Bush as &#8220;likable&#8221;</p>
<p>But&#8230;.</p>
<p>that figure has <b>dropped</b> (plummeted, one might say) <b>from 63% in August</b>.</p>
<p>Americans are generous; they like to think well of other people&#8230; until the evidence to the contrary just becomes overwhelming.</p>
<p>In the case of Bush, it&#8217;s becoming more overwhelming every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14087</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14087</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If 51% is a  mandate , what is 60%&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, be careful if you're going to rely on polls for your argument. According to  a Nov. 11 &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-11-bush-poll_x.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;USAToday&lt;/a&gt; article (which confirms the low poll numbers for Bush's &lt;strong&gt;job approval&lt;/strong&gt;), a MAJORITY of people still see Bush as "likeable" and "strong and decisive," which means JD has a valid point according to your standards of evidence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If 51% is a  mandate , what is 60%</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, be careful if you&#8217;re going to rely on polls for your argument. According to  a Nov. 11 <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-11-bush-poll_x.htm" rel="nofollow">USAToday</a> article (which confirms the low poll numbers for Bush&#8217;s <strong>job approval</strong>), a MAJORITY of people still see Bush as &#8220;likeable&#8221; and &#8220;strong and decisive,&#8221; which means JD has a valid point according to your standards of evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14086</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14086</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bush is going to announce his  victory strategy  for Iraq. It will most likely be the same idiotic speech...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So you admit he has talked about a "victory strategy" previously. You're correct; he HAS repeatedly explained under what conditions the US will leave Iraq.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bush is going to announce his  victory strategy  for Iraq. It will most likely be the same idiotic speech&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>So you admit he has talked about a &#8220;victory strategy&#8221; previously. You&#8217;re correct; he HAS repeatedly explained under what conditions the US will leave Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhys</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14085</link>
		<dc:creator>rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14085</guid>
		<description>"Wilbur, though you profess to speak for America, actually, you are only speaking for those that despise President Bush."

According to the opinion polls, that is over 60% of the country at the moment.  If 51% is a "mandate", what is 60%, JD?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wilbur, though you profess to speak for America, actually, you are only speaking for those that despise President Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the opinion polls, that is over 60% of the country at the moment.  If 51% is a &#8220;mandate&#8221;, what is 60%, JD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14084</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14084</guid>
		<description>Wilbur, though you profess to speak for America, actually, you are only speaking for those that despise President Bush.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur, though you profess to speak for America, actually, you are only speaking for those that despise President Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14083</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14083</guid>
		<description>George Bush has...

No charisma, no stature, no presence, no &lt;i&gt;auctoritas&lt;/i&gt;, no &lt;i&gt;gravitas&lt;/i&gt;, no &lt;i&gt;dignitas&lt;/i&gt;, no principles, no scruples, no "compassion", no empathy, no leadership, no generosity, no respect, no altruism, no conscience, no shame, no class.

What does he have?

Daddy's name, daddy's money, daddy's friends, a superficial affability that might - briefly - be mistaken for a personality and a pig-headedness that might -briefly- be mistaken for character.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush has&#8230;</p>
<p>No charisma, no stature, no presence, no <i>auctoritas</i>, no <i>gravitas</i>, no <i>dignitas</i>, no principles, no scruples, no &#8220;compassion&#8221;, no empathy, no leadership, no generosity, no respect, no altruism, no conscience, no shame, no class.</p>
<p>What does he have?</p>
<p>Daddy&#8217;s name, daddy&#8217;s money, daddy&#8217;s friends, a superficial affability that might - briefly - be mistaken for a personality and a pig-headedness that might -briefly- be mistaken for character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14082</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14082</guid>
		<description>Dear World,
9-11 kind of made us feel really insecure, and we felt we needed a simpleminded thug for president just to scare people for a while.  We're starting to get over it now.  Sorry it took so long.

Oh, and we won't really be able to do anything about it for the next three years.

Really sorry!  We don't know what to say!

Signed,
America
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear World,<br />
9-11 kind of made us feel really insecure, and we felt we needed a simpleminded thug for president just to scare people for a while.  We&#8217;re starting to get over it now.  Sorry it took so long.</p>
<p>Oh, and we won&#8217;t really be able to do anything about it for the next three years.</p>
<p>Really sorry!  We don&#8217;t know what to say!</p>
<p>Signed,<br />
America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellulose</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/11/29/the-slow-president/#comment-14081</link>
		<dc:creator>cellulose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=992#comment-14081</guid>
		<description>"We will not leave until we win!"

"Mr. President, how do we know when we have won?"

"When we have left!  Next question."
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We will not leave until we win!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Mr. President, how do we know when we have won?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;When we have left!  Next question.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
