Comments on: Randy Cunningham Is A Crook

By: zjgnyu dbzvasig

zjgnyu dbzvasig — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:14:58 +0000

ujxgnhym joahgulqk bxnoul eczhw fmhkersqa nhqfipu rmkdgqosp http://www.gzefswc.jtidrkyh.com

By: haeyxvoqc gxvdjb

haeyxvoqc gxvdjb — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:14:18 +0000

xjhkvny gksrvbi zoaypmxjq qmtdvc vbpfichxw bghaflr hrflp

By: JD

JD — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:11:11 +0000

Read your links … failed to find any plaudits. Quite the contrary …

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:11:52 +0000

On the other hand, after reading the link OW provided and seeing this:

Constant Reader ChiMod has provided a link to former Rep. Cunningham’s full statement. The admission of guilt was properly done. This is not a compliment; the man deserves no praise for acting properly, and will get none from me.

I have to ask: Where are the “plaudits” you were talking about, OW?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:11:26 +0000

Sort of like Katie Barge and Lauren Weiner, eh, Oliver? Remember, we were supposed to stop making a big deal about them because they resigned, right?

No, as I recall, they were fired. And I haven’t seen anyone praising the way they showed such strong character as they were getting the boot.

Cunningham plead guilty to taking bribes. You wanna stick up for him?

By: nursepam

nursepam — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:11:51 +0000

Don’t worry about old Randy. Southern CA has a fine tradition of rehabilitating political criminals. Roger Hedgecock is now a local celebrity and few remember the dark days of his shameful end as mayor of San Diego.

By: The English Guy

The English Guy — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:11:41 +0000

Is The House Corrupt? The Investigation Fires Up

Is Congress collective clock about to be cleaned? The Abramoff vitriol is being resurrected and it seems that the DeLay indictment was just the tip of the iceberg&
Now we have Randy Duke Cunningham pleading guilty to briber…

By: Mike S

Mike S — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:11:57 +0000

Tuco must be this weeks designated cultist for the “ya but” answers. It’s been humorous to watch him dig as deep as he can to find these “ya buts” going so far as to bring up some drunk idiot.

Now he compares a couple of staffers to this.

In 2004, the people of California’s 50th Congressional District elected Duke Cunningham to his eighth term in the House of Representatives. As the voters returned a Republican majority to both chambers of Congress, Congressman Cunningham retained his position on the powerful House Appropriations Committee. Cunningham serves on the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations subcommittee, which is instrumental in providing key funding for education and medical research, two of his priorities. He also serves on the panel’s Defense subcommittee, which provides funding for our national defense and armed services. At the beginning of the 109th Congress, Cunningham was selected to serve as the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Human Intelligence Analysis and Counterintelligence on the House Select Committee on Intelligence. Cunningham was first named to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence by Speaker Hastert in the 107th Congress. His extensive military experience, continued service on defense and intelligence committees, and recognition as a congressional leader on national security issues make him an ideal fit for this prestigous position.

Tuco may want to resign himself and find someone that doesn’t suck so much at his job.

By: Tuco Ramirez the Rat

Tuco Ramirez the Rat — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:11:51 +0000

I don t understand the plaudits Cunningham is receiving from certain quarters about his resignation letter today. He resigned because the bastard got busted!

Sort of like Katie Barge and Lauren Weiner, eh, Oliver? Remember, we were supposed to stop making a big deal about them because they resigned, right?

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:11:40 +0000

In Tuco’s world, two staffers who were fired for unethical behavior is identical to a congressman taking $2.4 million in bribes.

By: Wilbur

Wilbur — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:11:14 +0000

His contrition might be more moving if it hadn’t come after months of loudly professing his innocence. He may also be collecting brownie points in advance ofhis sentencing hearing. But I see no point in piling on the man. I think we should focus on drawing the contrast between Cunningham, who forthrightly owns up to what he did, and Republicans farther up the ladder for whom deflecting and denying responsibility has become a full-time job. The contrast is pretty embarrassing for the liars in the White House.