Check the Trollbot server, willya? I think it’s offline again.

Right here is the Washington Times article in which several prominent MD Democrats “go on the record” approving the tactics used against Mr. Steele.

Read carefully. Note the language inside the quote marks and how the reporter helpfully rewords each quote.

Notice also that the reporter who offers us this story–S.A. Miller–is the one who has been hawking this story for the Times all along, but who was not actually at the event in question, according to the Times’ managing editor.

“…prominent MD Democrats are on record…”?!?

Jay Tea? Anybody?

and prominent MD Democrats are on record as saying that such tactics are understandable and acceptable.

If so many examples are available, perhaps you’d be so good as to show us one or two?

Here’s a hint: don’t bother with the Washington Times’ sensational hatchet job. They wrote up a story with innocuous direct quotes from Maryland Dems, which the Times reporter generously reworded for better effect.

The moving hand hath writ, Constantine, and prominent MD Democrats are on record as saying that such tactics are understandable and acceptable. Good luck trying to stuff that genie back into the bottle and blame it on the Republicans, but like the video at gop.com (http://www.gop.com/Default.aspx?s=video), it’s their own words that are hanging the Democrats now.

J.

I find it more entertaining that mr. pedro is retreating to the classic right-wing, “it doesn’t matter if it isn’t true, it should be true!” debate tactic. The Republican mind is a junkyard of urban legends and half-truths that they all wish were actually factual, but in the end they are content to remain living in anti-reality.

I feel the phrase “fake, but accurate” coming over me…

J.

Doug MacEachern is caught in a lie yet again. (Read more)

So, since Oliver said he’d be quite pleased to have Kwesi Mfume as his Senator, let the record show that Oliver considers fathering five illegitimate kids a “mainstream Maryland value”.

It hardly matters whether it actually happened or nto when you have that kind of in-your-face bigotry eh?

“It didn’t happen here,” said Vander Harris, operations manager of the Murphy Fine Arts Building at Morgan State. “I was in on the cleanup, and we found no cookies or anything else abnormal. There were no Oreo cookies thrown.”

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/politics/bal-md.oreos13nov13,0,6788452.story

…I suggest throwing Moon Pies. Much bigger, greater accuracy.

But as I pointed out before, the repeated food attacks by liberals against conservative speakers make this story believable. I’m not sure what the food attacks symbolize. Maybe someone has a fetish about cream pies and Ann Coulter, for all I know.

But if Democrats want to be ultimately concerned about accuracy and honesty when relaying the details of an event, I would suggest that they think over their dishonest “Bush lied us into war” arguments very carefully.

It’s like when sports reporters ask an off-season injured free agents whether he’ll be 100% ready for the next season. Of course they’re coming back “stronger” than before. It’s pointless to ask. Why listen to someone who will give you a story that suits their best interest. In fact, they’re the *least* important person to listen to.

If you have a story that comes from one person in a room of 100 (made up number), that cannot be backed up by others in that very same room, and that person has a vested interest in the particular result they’re claiming, why would you listen to them? You’d seek out neutral parties, you’d seek our witnesses, you’d seek out anyone with information related to the event.

That’s what’s going on now. That’s why people think this story is bunk.

Have you ever been in a situation and asked yourself, “Why am I in a room where everyone is wrong about a particular fact except for me?” Usually, in those cases, you’re the exception, not the rule.

This is not currently an issue of racism — it’s an issue of fact. Let’s get our facts straight so we can figure out allegations so we can make certain conclusions.

Anyone notice how this type of racial ridicule is acceptable when the target does not have similar political philosophies of those on the tolerant left?

And, what is it with throwing food at people when you do not agree with them ? Some new leftist marching orders ?

Let’s remember Ehrlich and his handlers are on record as saying Steele was “pelted” with oreos; that the air was “thick as locusts” with flying oreos.

Now, JD attempts to make a fine distinction: that Steele had oreos thrown at him but none struck him. This, despite the fact that no media organization reported on oreos being tossed and personnel at the auditorium claim to have not seen oreos thrown or present in the post-debate cleanup.