Cowardice
Tweet
I think it’s been amusing how Glenn Reynolds simply links to someone idiotic to say what he’s afraid to say himself. But then, it’s sort of like how Bush never has the guts to state the names of those he disagrees with (some people, some Democrats). Cowards.
5 Responses to “Cowardice”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

I love this kind of shit: http://www.techcentralstation.com/020304A.html (linked to by Reynolds)
“In fact, I believe that the liberal stance of trying too hard to “humanize” our enemies is a mistake that will make the problem worse, and produce more violence rather than less.”
The last time I checked, the terrorists we are fighting are indeed human beings. Like Hitler was a human being. To call Bin Laden or Hitler monsters and leave it at that obscures more than it illuminates. It’s a defensive move — dare I say, a displacement mechanism (see the other idiot Reynolds links to ) to shield us from the darker truths about human nature and the truth that any human being can, given the right circumstances and influences, justify the most utterly abhorent actions. Unable to face this truth about human beings we turn away from it, declare the offenders something other than human, “animals,” “monsters” and “pure evil,” so that we can justify the use of savagery in our own response. We become then what we are fighting. Of course this kind of comment drives the Right-wingers batshit because, in their fear and ignorance, they don’t understand it. They think it means weakness which is the opposite of what it really means. It takes great honesty, and so great courage, to recognize that when we set out to kill our enemies, we are setting out to kill other human beings. In recognizing that our enemies are human, we place a check on our own instinctive will to savagery. In recognizing that sometimes we have to kill human beings to defend what is right and good, we ensure that we will never loose sight of the right and good ourselves. The opposite approach, to abstract the true nature of our enemies by referring to them as “animals” or “monsters” is the path to torture and darkness and the loss of all we claim to be defending. The right-wing would rather lose everything than ever have to face the truth.
You didn’t like my comment?
I disagree with McCain on a lot of things but I think his opposition to torture proves my point: Men of courage don’t torture:
“I hold no brief for the terrorists,” he said. “But it’s not about them. It’s about us. This battle we’re in is about the things we stand for and believe in and practice. And that is an observance of human rights, no matter how terrible our adversaries may be.”
Oops, wrong thread. I thought that the title “Cowardice” was referring to Howard Dean’s refusal to be interviewed together with Ken Mehlman on Meet the Press, like his predecessor, Terry McAuliffe, did on at least five occasions.
Unbelievable. Good to know that you’re Drudge’s little bitch, Tuco.