<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nextgame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:47:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10619</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10619</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusaction.org/press/a0000117.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dobson Welcomes Miers&#039; Nomination&lt;/a&gt;
IIRC, Democrats were demanding that Dobson be called to testify about his conversations with Rove about Miers. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/10/the-miers-ruckus/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oliver, too&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://focusaction.org/press/a0000117.cfm" rel="nofollow">Dobson Welcomes Miers&#8217; Nomination</a><br />
IIRC, Democrats were demanding that Dobson be called to testify about his conversations with Rove about Miers. <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/10/the-miers-ruckus/" rel="nofollow">Oliver, too</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10618</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10618</guid>
		<description>I answered you question, Quaker, but it&#039;s &quot;awaiting moderation&quot;. I suppose because I linked to Dobson&#039;s site and/or a previous OW post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered you question, Quaker, but it&#8217;s &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221;. I suppose because I linked to Dobson&#8217;s site and/or a previous OW post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10617</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10617</guid>
		<description>Dobson on what day? His support was pretty squishy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dobson on what day? His support was pretty squishy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10616</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10616</guid>
		<description>pionar, how about two? Dobson &amp; Robertson
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pionar, how about two? Dobson &#038; Robertson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pionar</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10615</link>
		<dc:creator>pionar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>JD,

name one.  Just one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD,</p>
<p>name one.  Just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nawoods</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10614</link>
		<dc:creator>nawoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10614</guid>
		<description>JD,

Don&#039;t forget,  we are at war with Eurasia, and at peace with East Asia.  We&#039;ve always been at war with Eurasia....

If ever a post demonstrated that this guy is not a serious commentor, this is the one.  Face facts, and I truly believe this, if GWB nominated Harry Reid for this seat on the bench, OW would find something to bitch about.  He would probably complain that Bush was trying to change the balance of power in the senate so he could make his tax cuts permanant, so he can continue to pursue his favorite hobby of taking money from poor starving women and children, or some other such nonsense!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget,  we are at war with Eurasia, and at peace with East Asia.  We&#8217;ve always been at war with Eurasia&#8230;.</p>
<p>If ever a post demonstrated that this guy is not a serious commentor, this is the one.  Face facts, and I truly believe this, if GWB nominated Harry Reid for this seat on the bench, OW would find something to bitch about.  He would probably complain that Bush was trying to change the balance of power in the senate so he could make his tax cuts permanant, so he can continue to pursue his favorite hobby of taking money from poor starving women and children, or some other such nonsense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>Oliver

The people that you routinely apply those ridiculous labels and descriptions to were in favor of Miers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver</p>
<p>The people that you routinely apply those ridiculous labels and descriptions to were in favor of Miers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10612</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10612</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s swell, Oliver. You can count the number who believe that America is a theocracy on the fingers of one hand, and the number of people who believe that the Constitution is in &quot;exile&quot; on the fingers of the other hand.

If you mean by &quot;exile&quot;, the people who think that the Constitution is whatever the last judge on the 9th Circuit CT says it is, then you mean all the liberal democrats in the US.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s swell, Oliver. You can count the number who believe that America is a theocracy on the fingers of one hand, and the number of people who believe that the Constitution is in &#8220;exile&#8221; on the fingers of the other hand.</p>
<p>If you mean by &#8220;exile&#8221;, the people who think that the Constitution is whatever the last judge on the 9th Circuit CT says it is, then you mean all the liberal democrats in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10611</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10611</guid>
		<description>People who believe that America is a theocracy or that the constitution is &quot;in exile&quot; qualify as far right with me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who believe that America is a theocracy or that the constitution is &#8220;in exile&#8221; qualify as far right with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevorwells</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>trevorwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>What is the quality of your intent?

Certain people have a way of saying things that shake us at the core. Even when the words do not seem harsh or offensive, the impact is shattering. What we could be experiencing is the intent behind the words. When we intend to do good, we do. When we intend to do harm, it happens. What each of us must come to realize is that our intent always comes through. We cannot sugarcoat the feelings in our heart of hearts. The emotion is the energy that motivates. We cannot ignore what we really want to create. We should be honest and do it the way we feel it. What we owe to ourselves and everyone around is to examine the reasons of our true intent.

My intent will be evident in the results.&quot;- Justice Thurgood Marshal, (1967-1991)

We must always keep in mind the message the President intends to send with his nominations to the Supreme Court. Unlike any other single act, a Supreme Court nominee s symbolic intent endures, as do their opinions.  Roberts  nomination represents retrenchment, Miers the maintenance of the status quo, the next is up in the air. I pray it is the same as the last but I am realistic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the quality of your intent?</p>
<p>Certain people have a way of saying things that shake us at the core. Even when the words do not seem harsh or offensive, the impact is shattering. What we could be experiencing is the intent behind the words. When we intend to do good, we do. When we intend to do harm, it happens. What each of us must come to realize is that our intent always comes through. We cannot sugarcoat the feelings in our heart of hearts. The emotion is the energy that motivates. We cannot ignore what we really want to create. We should be honest and do it the way we feel it. What we owe to ourselves and everyone around is to examine the reasons of our true intent.</p>
<p>My intent will be evident in the results.&#8221;- Justice Thurgood Marshal, (1967-1991)</p>
<p>We must always keep in mind the message the President intends to send with his nominations to the Supreme Court. Unlike any other single act, a Supreme Court nominee s symbolic intent endures, as do their opinions.  Roberts  nomination represents retrenchment, Miers the maintenance of the status quo, the next is up in the air. I pray it is the same as the last but I am realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10609</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10609</guid>
		<description>Exactly what do you describe as the far right.  Usually, around here, it is Dobson, et al., but they seemed to approve of Miers, much to your dismay.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what do you describe as the far right.  Usually, around here, it is Dobson, et al., but they seemed to approve of Miers, much to your dismay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10608</guid>
		<description>In a way, you have to feel sorry for Harriet Miers.

She&#039;s a very mediocre person who happened to trade on her creepy fawning cronyism for an intellectually retarded man-boy to get a nomination to the highest court in the land.

The spotlight merely accentuated her sad mediocrity.

But let&#039;s remember her put her in this spotlight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way, you have to feel sorry for Harriet Miers.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s a very mediocre person who happened to trade on her creepy fawning cronyism for an intellectually retarded man-boy to get a nomination to the highest court in the land.</p>
<p>The spotlight merely accentuated her sad mediocrity.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s remember her put her in this spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10607</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10607</guid>
		<description>Previous OW claim:
&lt;blockquote&gt;So you re telling me, of all the millions of gifted and talented women in this great nation of ours, a full 52% of our population, the best he could do was his pal and crony Harriet Miers?

For shame.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previous OW claim:</p>
<blockquote><p>So you re telling me, of all the millions of gifted and talented women in this great nation of ours, a full 52% of our population, the best he could do was his pal and crony Harriet Miers?</p>
<p>For shame.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>I learned this at another WordPress blog. Two links will put the post into &quot;awaiting moderation&quot; status.

What other things make it happen, I don&#039;t know.

From the WordPress blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/support/topic/19076#post-115585&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From WordPress&#039;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;We have the options to reflect that they only go into moderation if they contain 3 or more links, or these spam words, blah blah blah. However no matter what I do, it seems that every comment goes into moderation.

Main Page here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/support/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/support/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wordpress.org/support/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned this at another WordPress blog. Two links will put the post into &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221; status.</p>
<p>What other things make it happen, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>From the WordPress blog: <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/19076#post-115585" rel="nofollow">From WordPress&#8217;s Blog</a>We have the options to reflect that they only go into moderation if they contain 3 or more links, or these spam words, blah blah blah. However no matter what I do, it seems that every comment goes into moderation.</p>
<p>Main Page here: <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://wordpress.org/support/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/support/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10605</guid>
		<description>Bottomline is that the rightwing Taliban now know AWOL George can be rolled anytime.  The drunken fratboy is now a very lame duck drunken fratboy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottomline is that the rightwing Taliban now know AWOL George can be rolled anytime.  The drunken fratboy is now a very lame duck drunken fratboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10604</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Two links in one post put the post into  awaiting moderation  status.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not always. And there&#039;s more than that. I&#039;ve had several posts without any links that went into moderation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two links in one post put the post into  awaiting moderation  status.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not always. And there&#8217;s more than that. I&#8217;ve had several posts without any links that went into moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10603</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10603</guid>
		<description>Will he cave or, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hughesforamerica.typepad.com/hughes_for_america/2005/10/goodbye_miers_h.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as he seems wont to do&lt;/a&gt;, climb further in his cocoon-like echo chamber?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will he cave or, <a href="http://hughesforamerica.typepad.com/hughes_for_america/2005/10/goodbye_miers_h.html" rel="nofollow">as he seems wont to do</a>, climb further in his cocoon-like echo chamber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10602</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10602</guid>
		<description>See? Two links...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See? Two links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10601</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10601</guid>
		<description>Two links in one post put the post into &quot;awaiting moderation&quot; status.

Setting hyperbole aside would decimate your post, Oliver. But the most important point I want to make is that there will be no &quot;far right power grab on the American courts&quot;

The Supreme Court is not an elected body, it is an appointed body. Its members are appointed by different Presidents, for life, for two big reasons:

1) Different Presidents come from different backgrounds: ideological, political and social. We&#039;ve had conservative Presidents, liberal Presidents, religious Presidents, intellectual Presidents, and each of them has different motives for their choices. This was probably anticipated by the Founders.

2) The Justices are chosen for life, so that they have no fear of losing their jobs later at the whim of a Congress or Pesident. It works as a self - moderating force. Without it, the Justices would be nothing more than political pawns. Probably, another conservative judge will serve to effect a change in the voting habits of some other Justice. All the Justices are quite aware of how their votes count, and each of them can count from 1 to 5 with no problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two links in one post put the post into &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221; status.</p>
<p>Setting hyperbole aside would decimate your post, Oliver. But the most important point I want to make is that there will be no &#8220;far right power grab on the American courts&#8221;</p>
<p>The Supreme Court is not an elected body, it is an appointed body. Its members are appointed by different Presidents, for life, for two big reasons:</p>
<p>1) Different Presidents come from different backgrounds: ideological, political and social. We&#8217;ve had conservative Presidents, liberal Presidents, religious Presidents, intellectual Presidents, and each of them has different motives for their choices. This was probably anticipated by the Founders.</p>
<p>2) The Justices are chosen for life, so that they have no fear of losing their jobs later at the whim of a Congress or Pesident. It works as a self &#8211; moderating force. Without it, the Justices would be nothing more than political pawns. Probably, another conservative judge will serve to effect a change in the voting habits of some other Justice. All the Justices are quite aware of how their votes count, and each of them can count from 1 to 5 with no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/27/nextgame/#comment-10600</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=788#comment-10600</guid>
		<description>Yeah. What he said.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. What he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
