<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Those Cute (Maryland) Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10010</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10010</guid>
		<description>Thank you, BroD, for that incisive analysis of my post. You have changed my mind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, BroD, for that incisive analysis of my post. You have changed my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10009</link>
		<dc:creator>BroD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10009</guid>
		<description>Yes,  Frank--clearly nonsense.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,  Frank&#8211;clearly nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10008</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10008</guid>
		<description>There has been so little progress in the  War on Poverty  that liberals can say, with a straight face,  Katrina has shown us that we have not been paying attention to poverty .

In my mind, that like saying,  We haven t done enough about poverty   after all these years and billions of dollars.&quot;

&quot;In other words, we - government - have failed.

John Edwards can launch his anti - poverty road show, 40 years after the beginning of the &quot;Great Society&quot;.

Seems like, even the Democrats haven t anything to brag about in the anti - poverty department.

Clearer? BroD
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been so little progress in the  War on Poverty  that liberals can say, with a straight face,  Katrina has shown us that we have not been paying attention to poverty .</p>
<p>In my mind, that like saying,  We haven t done enough about poverty   after all these years and billions of dollars.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In other words, we &#8211; government &#8211; have failed.</p>
<p>John Edwards can launch his anti &#8211; poverty road show, 40 years after the beginning of the &#8220;Great Society&#8221;.</p>
<p>Seems like, even the Democrats haven t anything to brag about in the anti &#8211; poverty department.</p>
<p>Clearer? BroD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10007</link>
		<dc:creator>BroD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10007</guid>
		<description>Frank_D:  &quot;the Democrats haven t anything to brag about in the anti - poverty department.&quot;

(?!)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank_D:  &#8220;the Democrats haven t anything to brag about in the anti &#8211; poverty department.&#8221;</p>
<p>(?!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;BroD Says&lt;/b&gt;: Democrats have been consistently more sympathetic and supportive of the black community than the Republicans.

&quot;Sympathetc and supportive&quot; doesn&#039;t bring home the bacon. What have the much - touted anti - poverty programs done for poverty? Very little.

If there has been so little progress in the &quot;War on Poverty&quot; that liberals can say, with a straight face, &quot;Katrina has shown us that we have not been paying attention  to poverty&quot; (which, in my mind, is like saying, &quot;We haven&#039;t done enough about poverty -- after all these years and billions of dollars -- in other words, we have failed), and John Edwards can launch his anti - poverty road show, then even the Democrats haven&#039;t anything to brag about in the anti - poverty department.

Finally, when Republicans attempt to be &quot;sympathetic and supportive&quot;, i.e., by attempting to &quot;reach out&quot; to the Afro - American community, they are mocked by people like Oliver, and told it&#039;s a waste of time.

Are being &quot;support and sympathy&quot; only valued when coming from Democrats?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>BroD Says</b>: Democrats have been consistently more sympathetic and supportive of the black community than the Republicans.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sympathetc and supportive&#8221; doesn&#8217;t bring home the bacon. What have the much &#8211; touted anti &#8211; poverty programs done for poverty? Very little.</p>
<p>If there has been so little progress in the &#8220;War on Poverty&#8221; that liberals can say, with a straight face, &#8220;Katrina has shown us that we have not been paying attention  to poverty&#8221; (which, in my mind, is like saying, &#8220;We haven&#8217;t done enough about poverty &#8212; after all these years and billions of dollars &#8212; in other words, we have failed), and John Edwards can launch his anti &#8211; poverty road show, then even the Democrats haven&#8217;t anything to brag about in the anti &#8211; poverty department.</p>
<p>Finally, when Republicans attempt to be &#8220;sympathetic and supportive&#8221;, i.e., by attempting to &#8220;reach out&#8221; to the Afro &#8211; American community, they are mocked by people like Oliver, and told it&#8217;s a waste of time.</p>
<p>Are being &#8220;support and sympathy&#8221; only valued when coming from Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10005</link>
		<dc:creator>BroD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10005</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t put a lot of stock in the &quot;dems take blacks for granted&quot; argument.  That&#039;s not to say that the Democratic Party is perfectly responsive to the black community but let&#039;s face it, it&#039;s a minority population (as we all will be in the not too distant future.)

Where I live, blacks are very well represented in the Democratic Party
apparatus and  among elected officials.   Moreover anyone who has the slightest feel for the history of the parties with respect to race relations over the past 50 years and the voting records of current legislators will recognize that Democrats have been consistently more sympathetic and supportive of the black community than the Republicans.

Michael Steele is a bright, charismatic (and, yes, articulate) guy but he&#039;s a Republican toady with no street cred.  Both of the Democratic contenders
have extensive credibility on the issues.  Either of them will wipe Steele  (but that&#039;s ok--he can always run again in Illinois.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t put a lot of stock in the &#8220;dems take blacks for granted&#8221; argument.  That&#8217;s not to say that the Democratic Party is perfectly responsive to the black community but let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s a minority population (as we all will be in the not too distant future.)</p>
<p>Where I live, blacks are very well represented in the Democratic Party<br />
apparatus and  among elected officials.   Moreover anyone who has the slightest feel for the history of the parties with respect to race relations over the past 50 years and the voting records of current legislators will recognize that Democrats have been consistently more sympathetic and supportive of the black community than the Republicans.</p>
<p>Michael Steele is a bright, charismatic (and, yes, articulate) guy but he&#8217;s a Republican toady with no street cred.  Both of the Democratic contenders<br />
have extensive credibility on the issues.  Either of them will wipe Steele  (but that&#8217;s ok&#8211;he can always run again in Illinois.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10004</guid>
		<description>Sadie,

Again.  The &#039;word&#039; is not guilty. It has a harmless, complimentary meaning.  Why should political correctness decide blacks can&#039;t be articulate?  Or are you saying they can be articualte, we can recognize that they are articulate, but we just can&#039;t say it.  Now that would really be Orwellian.

See, I think such idiocy winds up trivializing other problems.  In other words, some could ask: &#039;Lets see. Among your problems are poverty, racism and being called articulate.&#039;

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie,</p>
<p>Again.  The &#8216;word&#8217; is not guilty. It has a harmless, complimentary meaning.  Why should political correctness decide blacks can&#8217;t be articulate?  Or are you saying they can be articualte, we can recognize that they are articulate, but we just can&#8217;t say it.  Now that would really be Orwellian.</p>
<p>See, I think such idiocy winds up trivializing other problems.  In other words, some could ask: &#8216;Lets see. Among your problems are poverty, racism and being called articulate.&#8217;</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SadieB</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10003</link>
		<dc:creator>SadieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10003</guid>
		<description>Suit yourself, dugger, only don&#039;t take offense when fightin words get you into  a fight. Because that would be clear evidence of an overwrought sensitivity.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suit yourself, dugger, only don&#8217;t take offense when fightin words get you into  a fight. Because that would be clear evidence of an overwrought sensitivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>Clinton fought for enterprise zones (Republican Jack Kemp&#039;s idea), a decent tax code (you mean like &quot;let&#039;s simplify the IRC&quot; [a Republican idea], &quot;let&#039;s reduce the tax rates&quot; [a Republican idea], or maybe a &quot;flat tax&quot; [a Republican idea]), and an economic boat that raised all ships (which never materialized, because it was mostly rhetoric, or &quot;words, not deeds&quot;, as you like to say.)

Reagan called us welfare pimps (actually, it was welfare queens, which was actually a vulgar way to express the idea of multigenerational welfare, an idea originally promulgated by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.children.smartlibrary.org/NewInterface/segment.cfm?segment=1805&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a Democrat&lt;/a&gt; and &quot;Bush left his jackass friend in charge of watching us die in Katrina.&quot; No, actually the black Mayor and the black Police Commisioner were responsible for that.

You vote Democratic because you have been deceived by Democrats into believing that &quot;the Republican party doesn t give a shit about black people.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton fought for enterprise zones (Republican Jack Kemp&#8217;s idea), a decent tax code (you mean like &#8220;let&#8217;s simplify the IRC&#8221; [a Republican idea], &#8220;let&#8217;s reduce the tax rates&#8221; [a Republican idea], or maybe a &#8220;flat tax&#8221; [a Republican idea]), and an economic boat that raised all ships (which never materialized, because it was mostly rhetoric, or &#8220;words, not deeds&#8221;, as you like to say.)</p>
<p>Reagan called us welfare pimps (actually, it was welfare queens, which was actually a vulgar way to express the idea of multigenerational welfare, an idea originally promulgated by <a href="http://www.children.smartlibrary.org/NewInterface/segment.cfm?segment=1805" rel="nofollow">a Democrat</a> and &#8220;Bush left his jackass friend in charge of watching us die in Katrina.&#8221; No, actually the black Mayor and the black Police Commisioner were responsible for that.</p>
<p>You vote Democratic because you have been deceived by Democrats into believing that &#8220;the Republican party doesn t give a shit about black people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10001</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10001</guid>
		<description>Sadie,

If there are words that have a non offensive dictionary meaning that are offensive to me, my family, my state etc, its up to us to overcome that backwardness and overwrought sensitivity rather than the population at large.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie,</p>
<p>If there are words that have a non offensive dictionary meaning that are offensive to me, my family, my state etc, its up to us to overcome that backwardness and overwrought sensitivity rather than the population at large.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-10000</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-10000</guid>
		<description>Has life been a bed of roses for black Americans? Nope. Are we at nirvana? Nope. But have black Americans prospered, have black Americans been at the table, have black Americans been acknowledged as full blown citizens with Democrats at the helm versus how they&#039;re looked upon by Republican presidents ? You bet your ass. Clinton fought for enterprise zones, a decent tax code, and an economic boat that raised all ships. Reagan called us welfare pimps, and Bush left his jackass friend in charge of watching us die in Katrina.

We vote Democratic because the Republican party doesn&#039;t give a shit about black people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has life been a bed of roses for black Americans? Nope. Are we at nirvana? Nope. But have black Americans prospered, have black Americans been at the table, have black Americans been acknowledged as full blown citizens with Democrats at the helm versus how they&#8217;re looked upon by Republican presidents ? You bet your ass. Clinton fought for enterprise zones, a decent tax code, and an economic boat that raised all ships. Reagan called us welfare pimps, and Bush left his jackass friend in charge of watching us die in Katrina.</p>
<p>We vote Democratic because the Republican party doesn&#8217;t give a shit about black people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;ve been away. I see Frank has decided to ask about this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Quaker: That would appear to be a failure on your part.

You re going to have to explain that one. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, you observed that it&#039;s &quot;clear as glass&quot; to you that black voters are shafted by both major parties. You further observe that this observation is not shared by black voters themselves. Finally, you note that the reason for this discrepancy in observations is beyond you.

Either your observation is faulty or the observation of black voters is faulty. The numbers make it likely that the failure is yours.

Yes?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;ve been away. I see Frank has decided to ask about this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Quaker: That would appear to be a failure on your part.</p>
<p>You re going to have to explain that one. </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, you observed that it&#8217;s &#8220;clear as glass&#8221; to you that black voters are shafted by both major parties. You further observe that this observation is not shared by black voters themselves. Finally, you note that the reason for this discrepancy in observations is beyond you.</p>
<p>Either your observation is faulty or the observation of black voters is faulty. The numbers make it likely that the failure is yours.</p>
<p>Yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9998</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9998</guid>
		<description>Sadie, Frank did answer. It&#039;s &quot;beyond him,&quot; he says.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie, Frank did answer. It&#8217;s &#8220;beyond him,&#8221; he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SadieB</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9997</link>
		<dc:creator>SadieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9997</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yeah guys, I simply made up the idea that  articulate  has been used as a way to denigrate prominent blacks. It s all in my head.&quot;

We all know you are just crazy like that, Oliver.

And dugger, if we can lay aside the right-wing victim complex for one minute, no one is &quot;high-jacking language&quot; or &quot;putting words off limits&quot; here. This is just Communication Skills 101.

There are words you guys don&#039;t like to be called, and when I want to be on your good side I don&#039;t use them. When I do choose to use language you hate, it&#039;s because I want to piss you off on purpose and we all know that.

It&#039;s only natural the process works both ways. When you use words we hate, we assume you are trying to be annoying.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah guys, I simply made up the idea that  articulate  has been used as a way to denigrate prominent blacks. It s all in my head.&#8221;</p>
<p>We all know you are just crazy like that, Oliver.</p>
<p>And dugger, if we can lay aside the right-wing victim complex for one minute, no one is &#8220;high-jacking language&#8221; or &#8220;putting words off limits&#8221; here. This is just Communication Skills 101.</p>
<p>There are words you guys don&#8217;t like to be called, and when I want to be on your good side I don&#8217;t use them. When I do choose to use language you hate, it&#8217;s because I want to piss you off on purpose and we all know that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only natural the process works both ways. When you use words we hate, we assume you are trying to be annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9996</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9996</guid>
		<description>Is it OK to say Barak Osama Obama Bin Osama is articulate &quot;for a Democrat&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it OK to say Barak Osama Obama Bin Osama is articulate &#8220;for a Democrat&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SadieB</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9995</link>
		<dc:creator>SadieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9995</guid>
		<description>And Frank, are you ever going to answer Quaker&#039;s challenge or are you going to keep pretending it was never issued? Keep trying to change the subject and hope everyone forgets you have been faced?

I haven&#039;t forgotten.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Frank, are you ever going to answer Quaker&#8217;s challenge or are you going to keep pretending it was never issued? Keep trying to change the subject and hope everyone forgets you have been faced?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9994</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9994</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re chasing your tail, Oliver...

Do you think blacks are dumb?

Or do you really think that the Democrats have done so much, on their own, with no help from Republicans, that blacks chould shower them with votes so they can continue on the path chosen for them by Democrats?

Do you think that blacks have it so good in this country -- because of Democrats -- that they should go out and vote for them in such huge numbers?

Do you honestly think that?

I sure don&#039;t.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re chasing your tail, Oliver&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you think blacks are dumb?</p>
<p>Or do you really think that the Democrats have done so much, on their own, with no help from Republicans, that blacks chould shower them with votes so they can continue on the path chosen for them by Democrats?</p>
<p>Do you think that blacks have it so good in this country &#8212; because of Democrats &#8212; that they should go out and vote for them in such huge numbers?</p>
<p>Do you honestly think that?</p>
<p>I sure don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9993</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So, when i was playing flanker in college&lt;/i&gt;

Hahhahahhhahahhahhahha.

Whew.

Those frat house flag football games are a bear, huh?

Look, our Repug Racists here fully understand why &quot;articulate&quot; can be a racial ploy.  It&#039;s like when a realtor shows you homes in the &quot;good neighborhood.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, when i was playing flanker in college</i></p>
<p>Hahhahahhhahahhahhahha.</p>
<p>Whew.</p>
<p>Those frat house flag football games are a bear, huh?</p>
<p>Look, our Repug Racists here fully understand why &#8220;articulate&#8221; can be a racial ploy.  It&#8217;s like when a realtor shows you homes in the &#8220;good neighborhood.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9992</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9992</guid>
		<description>Because the blacks are too dumb, right Frank?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the blacks are too dumb, right Frank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/20/oh-those-cute-maryland-republicans/#comment-9991</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=752#comment-9991</guid>
		<description>Rhys: Why would I be &quot;deliberately dense&quot;? And, if I were, what good would your explanation do?

But, as I said, they don&#039;t support these policies in spite of Republican opposition. Otherwise, whenever they were in the minority, they would be powerless to help any minority. But, then minorities would feel obligated to vote for the majority. But that never happens, does it?

And, to that, you&#039;re going to add that the evangelicals &quot;got screwed&quot; when lefties have been whining and moaning that Dobson and Robertson were the &quot;powers behind the throne&quot; since 2000.

I think you&#039;ve created two false histories here: 1) Where the Democrats -- in an alternate dimension -- were so helpful to blacks that they are eternally grateful to them even when they only &quot;don t make things any worse than they currently are.&quot; (All the while, liberals complain that things are getting worse and worse -- and, if Republicans are doing nothing, then.. But I digress). And, 2) A place where the Evangelicals got screwed by George W. Bush, when it wasn&#039;t he that has been incalcitrant about abortion; it wasn&#039;t he that has been obstinately opposed to faith - based initiatives and school vouchers. Guess who that was?

Meanwhile, back on our world, Democrats get credit for the things they do that require Republican cooperation; the Democrats get credit for programs that don&#039;t work; and the Republicans get accused of &#039;cutting&#039; spending, when they are only asking that &lt;i&gt;increases be curtailed&lt;/i&gt;

I say the Democrats are lying to the black community, and getting away with it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhys: Why would I be &#8220;deliberately dense&#8221;? And, if I were, what good would your explanation do?</p>
<p>But, as I said, they don&#8217;t support these policies in spite of Republican opposition. Otherwise, whenever they were in the minority, they would be powerless to help any minority. But, then minorities would feel obligated to vote for the majority. But that never happens, does it?</p>
<p>And, to that, you&#8217;re going to add that the evangelicals &#8220;got screwed&#8221; when lefties have been whining and moaning that Dobson and Robertson were the &#8220;powers behind the throne&#8221; since 2000.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve created two false histories here: 1) Where the Democrats &#8212; in an alternate dimension &#8212; were so helpful to blacks that they are eternally grateful to them even when they only &#8220;don t make things any worse than they currently are.&#8221; (All the while, liberals complain that things are getting worse and worse &#8212; and, if Republicans are doing nothing, then.. But I digress). And, 2) A place where the Evangelicals got screwed by George W. Bush, when it wasn&#8217;t he that has been incalcitrant about abortion; it wasn&#8217;t he that has been obstinately opposed to faith &#8211; based initiatives and school vouchers. Guess who that was?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back on our world, Democrats get credit for the things they do that require Republican cooperation; the Democrats get credit for programs that don&#8217;t work; and the Republicans get accused of &#8216;cutting&#8217; spending, when they are only asking that <i>increases be curtailed</i></p>
<p>I say the Democrats are lying to the black community, and getting away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
