<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s About Perjury, It&#8217;s About Obstruction Of Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:56:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9895</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9895</guid>
		<description>I see. You wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory. Thats what it is now and has been about all along.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So the CIA referred a complaint to the Ashcroft Justice Department which in turn handed the complaint to a Republican special prosecutor appointed by the White House. This special prosecutor has conducted a thorough and (in the words of the President) dignified investigation over many months.

But the whole thing all along was about the Democrats winning a political victory.

And this makes no sense to me because I can&#039;t understand the simple, obvious meaning of your words, right?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. You wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory. Thats what it is now and has been about all along.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the CIA referred a complaint to the Ashcroft Justice Department which in turn handed the complaint to a Republican special prosecutor appointed by the White House. This special prosecutor has conducted a thorough and (in the words of the President) dignified investigation over many months.</p>
<p>But the whole thing all along was about the Democrats winning a political victory.</p>
<p>And this makes no sense to me because I can&#8217;t understand the simple, obvious meaning of your words, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9894</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9894</guid>
		<description>Quaker,

&quot;Maybe  that s what it s been about all along  has some other meaning I don t get. &quot;

I think you nailed it.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,</p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe  that s what it s been about all along  has some other meaning I don t get. &#8221;</p>
<p>I think you nailed it.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9893</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9893</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Who said he was  trying  to win a vicory for Dems?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe nobody. Maybe &quot;that&#039;s what it&#039;s been about all along&quot; has some other meaning I don&#039;t get.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Who said he was  trying  to win a vicory for Dems?</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe nobody. Maybe &#8220;that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s been about all along&#8221; has some other meaning I don&#8217;t get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9892</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9892</guid>
		<description>&quot; Bush-appointed Republican special prosecutor is trying to win a political victory for Democrats?

Whoops. &quot;


Whoops, my behind!  Who said he was &#039;trying&#039; to win a vicory for Dems?  And hopefully, you will remember the track record of special prosecutors going after memnbers of their own party.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Bush-appointed Republican special prosecutor is trying to win a political victory for Democrats?</p>
<p>Whoops. &#8221;</p>
<p>Whoops, my behind!  Who said he was &#8216;trying&#8217; to win a vicory for Dems?  And hopefully, you will remember the track record of special prosecutors going after memnbers of their own party.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9891</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9891</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I ll believe otherwise when you show me a raft statements from leftie posters here and Democrats in general, before Plame, expressing concern about the well being and cover of CIA agents&lt;/i&gt;

As dim as my opinion is of Rove and Libby, I, for one, never would have dreamed that they would stoop so low as to out an undercover agent for cheap shot at a political opponent.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I ll believe otherwise when you show me a raft statements from leftie posters here and Democrats in general, before Plame, expressing concern about the well being and cover of CIA agents</i></p>
<p>As dim as my opinion is of Rove and Libby, I, for one, never would have dreamed that they would stoop so low as to out an undercover agent for cheap shot at a political opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9890</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9890</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory. Thats what it is now and has been about all along. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

A Bush-appointed Republican special prosecutor is trying to win a political victory for Democrats?

Whoops.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory. Thats what it is now and has been about all along. </p></blockquote>
<p>A Bush-appointed Republican special prosecutor is trying to win a political victory for Democrats?</p>
<p>Whoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>Wilbur,

Your pilot analogy is reasonable butit  still suggests no real harm done - which was my point. Evreybody walked away.  Your pilot engaged in active, overt immediatley dangerous illegal behavior which risked the lives of lots of passengers.  None of that is the case with Plame.  None of it.  In fact no one has identified anything of immediate or even near term significant negative impact.  A paper cover company may have had to be erased, but she was no longer in the field.    Hadn&#039;t been for a while.  Unlike the Agee deal, no one has been murdered and unlike Agee, here maybe one and one only,  Wash DC based CIA person was outed.   So, how, if at all, was it  near term dangerous like your pilot analogy?  And I&#039;m not sure what the actual long term danger is if it is proven to be a crime.  That its a bad thing to out CIA agents.  Yes, but Agee already taught those who pay attention that.

Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory.  Thats what it is now and has been about all along.  I&#039;ll believe otherwise when you show me a raft statements from leftie posters here and Democrats in general, before Plame, expressing concern about the well being and cover of CIA agents. It wasn&#039;t on the their radar scopes until it became a way to get Bush.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur,</p>
<p>Your pilot analogy is reasonable butit  still suggests no real harm done &#8211; which was my point. Evreybody walked away.  Your pilot engaged in active, overt immediatley dangerous illegal behavior which risked the lives of lots of passengers.  None of that is the case with Plame.  None of it.  In fact no one has identified anything of immediate or even near term significant negative impact.  A paper cover company may have had to be erased, but she was no longer in the field.    Hadn&#8217;t been for a while.  Unlike the Agee deal, no one has been murdered and unlike Agee, here maybe one and one only,  Wash DC based CIA person was outed.   So, how, if at all, was it  near term dangerous like your pilot analogy?  And I&#8217;m not sure what the actual long term danger is if it is proven to be a crime.  That its a bad thing to out CIA agents.  Yes, but Agee already taught those who pay attention that.</p>
<p>Some technical violation may be uncovered and that may lead to indictments and Democrats will have won a major political victory.  Thats what it is now and has been about all along.  I&#8217;ll believe otherwise when you show me a raft statements from leftie posters here and Democrats in general, before Plame, expressing concern about the well being and cover of CIA agents. It wasn&#8217;t on the their radar scopes until it became a way to get Bush.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9888</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9888</guid>
		<description>Under dugger&#039;s way of thinking if the pilot of a loaded airliner slipped his copilot a mickey, downed a quart of jack daniels in the pilot seat and snorted twelve lines of coke; if said pilot then slipped into a well-earned coma; if said airliner did loop-de-loops around the empire state building; if said pilot slumped forward upon the controls of the airliner in just the right way so that the landing gears deployed and the airliner was steered to a perfect landing at Laguardia; if the jolt of landing was just enough to wake the pilot from his haze enough to bring the plane to a safe halt; then said pilot, according to Dugger, should not be liable for censure, much less dismissal or even criminal prosecution, since no actual harm was done.

That&#039;s what Dugger would say if the pilot was a Republican.  If the pilot was a Democrat Dugger would be all over him like shit on a shingle.

What a tool.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under dugger&#8217;s way of thinking if the pilot of a loaded airliner slipped his copilot a mickey, downed a quart of jack daniels in the pilot seat and snorted twelve lines of coke; if said pilot then slipped into a well-earned coma; if said airliner did loop-de-loops around the empire state building; if said pilot slumped forward upon the controls of the airliner in just the right way so that the landing gears deployed and the airliner was steered to a perfect landing at Laguardia; if the jolt of landing was just enough to wake the pilot from his haze enough to bring the plane to a safe halt; then said pilot, according to Dugger, should not be liable for censure, much less dismissal or even criminal prosecution, since no actual harm was done.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Dugger would say if the pilot was a Republican.  If the pilot was a Democrat Dugger would be all over him like shit on a shingle.</p>
<p>What a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>As a matter of fact, &quot;actual harm&quot; is something that&#039;s been forgotten in all the breathless reports about the Plame matter.

&lt;i&gt;Was&lt;/i&gt; there any harm done to U.S. security interests? None of the so-called reporters working this story have remembered to ask.

The absence of harm wouldn&#039;t excuse recklessness in revealing the identity of a CIA agent and it wouldn&#039;t justify the covert White House operation to &quot;get&quot; a political detractor. But it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a relevant part of the story. No one seems to have made a solid case either way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a matter of fact, &#8220;actual harm&#8221; is something that&#8217;s been forgotten in all the breathless reports about the Plame matter.</p>
<p><i>Was</i> there any harm done to U.S. security interests? None of the so-called reporters working this story have remembered to ask.</p>
<p>The absence of harm wouldn&#8217;t excuse recklessness in revealing the identity of a CIA agent and it wouldn&#8217;t justify the covert White House operation to &#8220;get&#8221; a political detractor. But it <i>is</i> a relevant part of the story. No one seems to have made a solid case either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To try and make  troops  another  victimized  , lobotomized Democrat constituency will never work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nice.

Which Democratic constituencies would you characterize as &quot;lobotomized&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To try and make  troops  another  victimized  , lobotomized Democrat constituency will never work.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice.</p>
<p>Which Democratic constituencies would you characterize as &#8220;lobotomized&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>Wilbur,

You make my point for me.  Is this the best &#039;hurt&#039; you cam come up with?

&quot;At the very least they have caused a boatload of taxpayer money to be spent on the investigations of their misdeeds and subsequent coverups. &#039;

Your &#039;they&#039; , I assume the alleged leakers, didn&#039;t cause this.  Somebody decided to do it.   It needn&#039;t have been done at all.  The investigations, if need at all, could have ben done within the current structure.  Of course, Democrats would have compalined so due to political presure,t here was a special prosecutor.  But thats the sytem overreacting.

Dugger

frame,

Most troops had body armor.  Troops have always lacked something.  They lacked under Johnson, Carter, and Clinton just as much under Bush etc.  Progressives were only heard from when they thought the shortage could be used to get Bush.  Troops also care about morale and misson accomplishment and being supported on those items.  They care about esprit de corp and are gung ho.  You don&#039;t need to like or accept that , but thats the way good troops are.  To try and make &#039;troops&#039; another  &#039;victimized&#039; ,  lobotomized Democrat constituency will never work.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur,</p>
<p>You make my point for me.  Is this the best &#8216;hurt&#8217; you cam come up with?</p>
<p>&#8220;At the very least they have caused a boatload of taxpayer money to be spent on the investigations of their misdeeds and subsequent coverups. &#8216;</p>
<p>Your &#8216;they&#8217; , I assume the alleged leakers, didn&#8217;t cause this.  Somebody decided to do it.   It needn&#8217;t have been done at all.  The investigations, if need at all, could have ben done within the current structure.  Of course, Democrats would have compalined so due to political presure,t here was a special prosecutor.  But thats the sytem overreacting.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
<p>frame,</p>
<p>Most troops had body armor.  Troops have always lacked something.  They lacked under Johnson, Carter, and Clinton just as much under Bush etc.  Progressives were only heard from when they thought the shortage could be used to get Bush.  Troops also care about morale and misson accomplishment and being supported on those items.  They care about esprit de corp and are gung ho.  You don&#8217;t need to like or accept that , but thats the way good troops are.  To try and make &#8216;troops&#8217; another  &#8216;victimized&#8217; ,  lobotomized Democrat constituency will never work.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9884</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9884</guid>
		<description>Ya. Okay. I&#039;m sure the troops appreciate a banner printed by the White House press staff more than they appreciate body armor and for the Pentagon to keep its promises about bonuses and medical care. I&#039;m gald to hear you now consider adequate equipment and pay in return for reenlistment mere &quot;social programs.&quot; I&#039;ll put that down with your argument that perjury and obstruction of justice are the jaywalking of the judicial system. Keep lowering those standards, Dug!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya. Okay. I&#8217;m sure the troops appreciate a banner printed by the White House press staff more than they appreciate body armor and for the Pentagon to keep its promises about bonuses and medical care. I&#8217;m gald to hear you now consider adequate equipment and pay in return for reenlistment mere &#8220;social programs.&#8221; I&#8217;ll put that down with your argument that perjury and obstruction of justice are the jaywalking of the judicial system. Keep lowering those standards, Dug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9883</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9883</guid>
		<description>Wilbur, Don Rickles you ain&#039;t -- get over yourself...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur, Don Rickles you ain&#8217;t &#8212; get over yourself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9882</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9882</guid>
		<description>frame.  Bush didn&#039;t me convince me of jack squat about who did or didn&#039;t support the troops. Long years of first hand personal experience did.   And you obvioulsy don&#039;t understand the mindset of the &#039;troops&#039;.  You eveidently can only equate support with giving some them some social program.  &#039;Troops&quot; liked Bush better becasue they know he was closer to being one of them.  And they, like me, will never forgive Kerry for his after war activities (nor  Fonda) .  Troops appreciate, rather than ridicule, &#039;mission accomplished&quot;. You don&#039;t have to like or agree with that. Just understand the troops see it differently than you and progressives.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frame.  Bush didn&#8217;t me convince me of jack squat about who did or didn&#8217;t support the troops. Long years of first hand personal experience did.   And you obvioulsy don&#8217;t understand the mindset of the &#8216;troops&#8217;.  You eveidently can only equate support with giving some them some social program.  &#8216;Troops&#8221; liked Bush better becasue they know he was closer to being one of them.  And they, like me, will never forgive Kerry for his after war activities (nor  Fonda) .  Troops appreciate, rather than ridicule, &#8216;mission accomplished&#8221;. You don&#8217;t have to like or agree with that. Just understand the troops see it differently than you and progressives.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9881</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9881</guid>
		<description>Actually, Frank, both my statements are correct. And are you sure your last initial is really &quot;D&quot;?  The more desperate you get the more I hear the whiny voice of Frank Burns behind your posts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Frank, both my statements are correct. And are you sure your last initial is really &#8220;D&#8221;?  The more desperate you get the more I hear the whiny voice of Frank Burns behind your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9880</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9880</guid>
		<description>Wilbur -- ::Bzzt!:: Wrong! Try again...

&lt;i&gt;Truth be told, though, I wanted Rove and Libby to resign even before all this crap came to light.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;That&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; more like it!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur &#8212; ::Bzzt!:: Wrong! Try again&#8230;</p>
<p><i>Truth be told, though, I wanted Rove and Libby to resign even before all this crap came to light.</i></p>
<p><i>That&#8217;s</i> more like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9879</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9879</guid>
		<description>Wilbur;

Just remember the expression plea bargain, and remember how much pressure is going to be added to Fitzgerald should  the indictments include Cheney.  More than likely, as is the case with white-collar criminals routinely, is they get a few months at most.  You see the reason your white-collar criminal is so amped about fighting the war on crime, is he wants to feel safe from the street criminals so he can ply his trade sans any competition.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur;</p>
<p>Just remember the expression plea bargain, and remember how much pressure is going to be added to Fitzgerald should  the indictments include Cheney.  More than likely, as is the case with white-collar criminals routinely, is they get a few months at most.  You see the reason your white-collar criminal is so amped about fighting the war on crime, is he wants to feel safe from the street criminals so he can ply his trade sans any competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9878</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9878</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So, I ask again, why should you be asking for Republicans to resign?&lt;/i&gt;

Um, maybe because lying and obstructing justice about your official taxpayer-paid duties is a bit more serious than the best case the vwrc could drum up against Clinton?

Truth be told, though, I wanted Rove and Libby to resign even before all this crap came to light.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, I ask again, why should you be asking for Republicans to resign?</i></p>
<p>Um, maybe because lying and obstructing justice about your official taxpayer-paid duties is a bit more serious than the best case the vwrc could drum up against Clinton?</p>
<p>Truth be told, though, I wanted Rove and Libby to resign even before all this crap came to light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9877</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9877</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I asked and still ask, exactly what real damage has been done? Is there not a better answer than we don t know?&lt;/i&gt;

At the very least they have caused a boatload of taxpayer money to be spent on the investigations of their misdeeds and subsequent coverups.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I asked and still ask, exactly what real damage has been done? Is there not a better answer than we don t know?</i></p>
<p>At the very least they have caused a boatload of taxpayer money to be spent on the investigations of their misdeeds and subsequent coverups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/18/its-about-perjury-its-about-obstruction-of-justice/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=738#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>Dugger --

Democrats and Kerry ran on supporting the troops. Bush, however, convinced conservatives such as yourself that only Republicans cared for the troops. And so Kerryt lost by a slim margin. And now where are we? The same problems that were brought up in the 2004 campaign are still with us. Bush has done nothing to support the troops and the situation seems to have gotten worse with soldiers getting bills for their medical care and the Pentagon reneging on its promise of bonuses. All I have to say to you is this: Sucker. Too bad our soliders are paying the price for your gullibility.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger &#8211;</p>
<p>Democrats and Kerry ran on supporting the troops. Bush, however, convinced conservatives such as yourself that only Republicans cared for the troops. And so Kerryt lost by a slim margin. And now where are we? The same problems that were brought up in the 2004 campaign are still with us. Bush has done nothing to support the troops and the situation seems to have gotten worse with soldiers getting bills for their medical care and the Pentagon reneging on its promise of bonuses. All I have to say to you is this: Sucker. Too bad our soliders are paying the price for your gullibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
