<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything Is Beautiful, In Its Own Way&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:31:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth C.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9706</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9706</guid>
		<description>The &quot;criminalization of politics&quot; meme is the ultimate in hypocrisy. We need to turn it around--the White House (okay, the entire GOP--look at DeLay) is &quot;politicizing criminal activity&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;criminalization of politics&#8221; meme is the ultimate in hypocrisy. We need to turn it around&#8211;the White House (okay, the entire GOP&#8211;look at DeLay) is &#8220;politicizing criminal activity&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9705</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9705</guid>
		<description>That is, &lt;em&gt;I met him once and he didn t strike me as someone who &lt;b&gt;would&lt;/b&gt; be that clueless.&lt;/em&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is, <em>I met him once and he didn t strike me as someone who <b>would</b> be that clueless.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9704</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9704</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If so, why bring up the spector of a civil action now? One doesn t fire that bullet until all others are exhausted.&lt;/em&gt;

That doesn&#039;t follow.  There&#039;s nothing he loses by pointing out that he may file a civil suit later.

&lt;em&gt;Wilson is apparently unaware that defense counsel would be able to depose him in such a civil suit. Were someone to share that with Joe, I doubt he d be so gung-ho on this particular legal action.&lt;/em&gt;

I highly doubt that he is unaware that he can be deposed.  He was an ambassador and speaks several languages.  I met him once and he didn&#039;t strike me as someone who wouldn&#039;t be that clueless.
But, just for the sake of argument, let us assume that he doesn&#039;t know.  Can you explain why this would be problematic for him?  It&#039;s not like he&#039;s been reticent up to now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If so, why bring up the spector of a civil action now? One doesn t fire that bullet until all others are exhausted.</em></p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t follow.  There&#8217;s nothing he loses by pointing out that he may file a civil suit later.</p>
<p><em>Wilson is apparently unaware that defense counsel would be able to depose him in such a civil suit. Were someone to share that with Joe, I doubt he d be so gung-ho on this particular legal action.</em></p>
<p>I highly doubt that he is unaware that he can be deposed.  He was an ambassador and speaks several languages.  I met him once and he didn&#8217;t strike me as someone who wouldn&#8217;t be that clueless.<br />
But, just for the sake of argument, let us assume that he doesn&#8217;t know.  Can you explain why this would be problematic for him?  It&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s been reticent up to now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9703</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9703</guid>
		<description>From this we can glean:

A) Wilson believes that Fitzgerald will NOT indict Rove, Libby, et.al.  If so, why bring up the spector of a civil action now?  One doesn&#039;t fire that bullet until all others are exhausted.

B) Wilson is apparently unaware that defense counsel would be able to depose him in such a civil suit.  Were someone to share that with Joe, I doubt he&#039;d be so gung-ho on this particular legal action.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this we can glean:</p>
<p>A) Wilson believes that Fitzgerald will NOT indict Rove, Libby, et.al.  If so, why bring up the spector of a civil action now?  One doesn&#8217;t fire that bullet until all others are exhausted.</p>
<p>B) Wilson is apparently unaware that defense counsel would be able to depose him in such a civil suit.  Were someone to share that with Joe, I doubt he&#8217;d be so gung-ho on this particular legal action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9702</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9702</guid>
		<description>Billmon says
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billmon says</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9701</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9701</guid>
		<description>well, Billmon also says:

Stare Decisis
I&#039;m guessing that this time we won&#039;t hear a lot of Republicans harrumphing about the fact that &quot;no man is above the law.&quot;

In an interview yesterday, Wilson said that once the criminal questions are settled, he and his wife may file a civil lawsuit against Bush, Cheney and others seeking damages for the alleged harm done to Plame&#039;s career.
If they do so, the current state of the law makes it likely that the suit will be allowed to proceed -- and Bush and Cheney will face questioning under oath -- while they are in office. The reason for that is a unanimous 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that Paula Jones&#039; sexual harassment suit against then-President Bill Clinton could go forward immediately, a decision that was hailed by conservatives at the time.

The real question is: What &quot;good for one use only&quot; legal doctrine will Roberts, Miers, Scalia and Thomas adopt this time.

Miers: Executive privilege is so &quot;cool&quot;!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.billmon.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.billmon.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.billmon.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Posted by billmon at 08:54 AM
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, Billmon also says:</p>
<p>Stare Decisis<br />
I&#8217;m guessing that this time we won&#8217;t hear a lot of Republicans harrumphing about the fact that &#8220;no man is above the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>In an interview yesterday, Wilson said that once the criminal questions are settled, he and his wife may file a civil lawsuit against Bush, Cheney and others seeking damages for the alleged harm done to Plame&#8217;s career.<br />
If they do so, the current state of the law makes it likely that the suit will be allowed to proceed &#8212; and Bush and Cheney will face questioning under oath &#8212; while they are in office. The reason for that is a unanimous 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that Paula Jones&#8217; sexual harassment suit against then-President Bill Clinton could go forward immediately, a decision that was hailed by conservatives at the time.</p>
<p>The real question is: What &#8220;good for one use only&#8221; legal doctrine will Roberts, Miers, Scalia and Thomas adopt this time.</p>
<p>Miers: Executive privilege is so &#8220;cool&#8221;!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.billmon.org/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.billmon.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.billmon.org/</a><br />
Posted by billmon at 08:54 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buma</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9700</link>
		<dc:creator>buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9700</guid>
		<description>Depends on how you use the word.
Why does Bushco continue to criminalize the executive branch? How much more of this GOP-sponsored criminalization will the American people tolerate? Power corrupts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on how you use the word.<br />
Why does Bushco continue to criminalize the executive branch? How much more of this GOP-sponsored criminalization will the American people tolerate? Power corrupts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/16/everything-is-beautiful-in-its-own-way/#comment-9699</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=725#comment-9699</guid>
		<description>It just all depends on whose ox is being gored.

Is it a coinkidinky that the same feckless promoters of the conservative agenda had their own interests foremost in mind when they had the power(sans the right) to take full advantage?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just all depends on whose ox is being gored.</p>
<p>Is it a coinkidinky that the same feckless promoters of the conservative agenda had their own interests foremost in mind when they had the power(sans the right) to take full advantage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
