If Karl has done something wrong, I hope he gets it good.

OW- might want to wait til there is a conviction, or maybe an indictment
before you label him a Perp.

Another question for Jade-

Now that Sandy Berger has pled guilty to stealing and destroying those documents, are you going to stop defending the Clinton administration?

Now that Air America has admitted to misappropriating funds meant for needy children, are you going to denounce them?

Have you ever noticed that there is enough bad behavior on both sides of the aisle that neither side should be allowed to fingerpoint?

Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty?

Also, while you sneer at W and improperly label him as AWOL, I wonder
do you hold similar contempt for Bill the Draft Dodger?

Let it be known that I too would of dodged the Vietnam draft, I do not judge Bill for that, my point being you seem to have selective outrage
and a faux respect for the military.

[Miller] said [Libby] did not reveal Ms. Plame’s name.

Dugger

I can see it now: Dugger: ‘Convictions mean nothing. This was politically-motivated. They jailed Nelson Mandela, you know.’

Let’s review the facts, shall we? We know at least Rove has lied to AWOL George. We also know AWOL George stated he would punish anyone in his illegitimate admin that was found to have leaked on this subject; we know Rove leaked.

Well yes. I like Rusert and even as a partisan Democrat, would hate to see him do the ol Joe Wilson perp walk.

Russert and Wilson indicted? Sure. Right after you say, “Thanks Ms. Alba, that was even better than last time.”

But before you wake up.

So was the OJ jury and look how bright they were.

After waht I’ve been reading about Fitzgerald, he doesn’t waste time on a case that requires a lot of fishing. He’s brilliant and a workaholic. Indictments will come. But whose?

“Here s the question to Dugger: if there are indictments, will you continue to defend this illegitimate admin? After all, their campaign was all about honesty and accountability. ”

That doesn’t even meet your typically low standards. You can get an indictment of anything. It is not a finding of guilt. And the administration is completely legitimate. So other than the asinine, factually challenged question, howzwe it goin.

Semant, Well you’re allowed your guess too. I think every special prosecutor wastes time and feels his performance will be measured solely on the basis of getting indictments and then (more work!!) convictions. They are incentivized that way.

Quake,

“Already with the excuses?”

Well yes. I like Rusert and even as a partisan Democrat, would hate to see him do the ol’ Joe Wilson perp walk.

Dugger, “my object, so sublime, which I shall achieve in time, to let the punishment fit the crime “

One possibility is nothing on Plame but some finding against somebody who forgot something they wrote three decades ago.

Already with the excuses?

Here’s the question to Dugger: if there are indictments, will you continue to defend this illegitimate admin? After all, their campaign was all about honesty and accountability.

My guess is that Rove’s fate has been decided before this date; the likely purpose of today’s proceeding is for Rove to cut or not cut a deal.

Dugger