Comments on: NY Is For… Democrats http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:56:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: JK http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8629 JK Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:10:18 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8629 >>So she can continue tack right, say  scr*w you to the Kos wing of the party, and have a shot at the big kahuna. Let the left-wing conspiracy begin: ABC is effectively innoculating the country to the idea of a woman President with "Commander in Chief" starring Gina Davis. Dugger's worst nightmare: President Hillary Clinton. Please God. Make it be so. I'll be good. I promise. JK >>So she can continue tack right, say  scr*w you to the Kos wing of the party, and have a shot at the big kahuna.

Let the left-wing conspiracy begin: ABC is effectively innoculating the country to the idea of a woman President with “Commander in Chief” starring Gina Davis.

Dugger’s worst nightmare: President Hillary Clinton.

Please God. Make it be so. I’ll be good. I promise.

JK

]]> By: DannyYeager http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8628 DannyYeager Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:10:36 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8628 Pataki and Bloomberg are not what I would call traditinal conservative Republicans. Both are pro-chioce on abortion and Bloomberg was once a Democrat but switched parties out of political convenience. You can't deny that, statewide, NY is pretty much true blue. DY Pataki and Bloomberg are not what I would call traditinal conservative Republicans. Both are pro-chioce on abortion and Bloomberg was once a Democrat but switched parties out of political convenience.

You can’t deny that, statewide, NY is pretty much true blue.

DY

]]> By: neoconsrloopy http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8627 neoconsrloopy Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:10:28 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8627 Moving the goalposts again I see. Moving the goalposts again I see.

]]> By: neoconsrloopy http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8626 neoconsrloopy Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:10:26 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8626 Yea, NY votes only for Democrats- that's why they've had a Democratic governor and the city of NY has had a Democratic mayor for 12 years. And all the congressional delegation is Democratic, also. Oh, wait a minute. Never mind. Yea, NY votes only for Democrats- that’s why they’ve had a Democratic governor and the city of NY has had a Democratic mayor for 12 years. And all the congressional delegation is Democratic, also.

Oh, wait a minute. Never mind.

]]> By: DannyYeager http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8625 DannyYeager Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:10:22 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8625 NY is a Democratic stonghold? Who knew? Oh yeah, Hillary knew. Because NY was one of the few states she could relocate to where she would be assured of a Senate seat. NY is a Democratic stonghold?

Who knew?

Oh yeah, Hillary knew. Because NY was one of the few states she could relocate to where she would be assured of a Senate seat.

]]> By: dugger1 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8624 dugger1 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:10:27 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8624 This works out well for Hillary. NY would vote for her even they found out she blew the New Orleans levees. So she can continue tack right, say 'scr*w you to the Kos wing of the party, and have a shot at the big kahuna. Dugger, You Have my Permisssion to use this Analsyis as if it were your own This works out well for Hillary. NY would vote for her even they found out she blew the New Orleans levees. So she can continue tack right, say ’scr*w you to the Kos wing of the party, and have a shot at the big kahuna.

Dugger, You Have my Permisssion to use this Analsyis as if it were your own

]]> By: Frank_D http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8623 Frank_D Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:10:23 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8623 Did you say New York was for Democrats? You mean the fact that New York's Electoral votes, with a few exceptions, went to New York, since about 1960, was not a Dems - Diebold conspiracy? Who would have guessed? Did you say New York was for Democrats?

You mean the fact that New York’s Electoral votes, with a few exceptions, went to New York, since about 1960, was not a Dems – Diebold conspiracy?

Who would have guessed?

]]> By: Semanticleo http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/10/04/ny-is-for-democrats/#comment-8622 Semanticleo Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:10:56 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=664#comment-8622 Another corrupt prosecutor to dog the poor, wrongly maligned conservatives? Another corrupt prosecutor to dog the poor, wrongly maligned conservatives?

]]>