Comments on: NARAL’s Boy http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:01:33 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: neoconsrloopy http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7249 neoconsrloopy Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:09:33 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7249 Free clue: The right could nominate a loon anyway. For that matter, Roberts could be a loon too- since he has no experience and won't answer questions, we don't know. Should we really send someone with only a year of experience to the highest judicial position in the US? The Bork comparison is interesting- he actually told us he was a loon. That taught the cons NEVER to tell people what they really think, because the public will summarily reject this. Free clue: The right could nominate a loon anyway. For that matter, Roberts could be a loon too- since he has no experience and won’t answer questions, we don’t know.

Should we really send someone with only a year of experience to the highest judicial position in the US?

The Bork comparison is interesting- he actually told us he was a loon. That taught the cons NEVER to tell people what they really think, because the public will summarily reject this.

]]> By: middleamericachron http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7248 middleamericachron Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:09:12 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7248 Opposing Roberts only hurts the Democrats. If they can be portrayed as obstructionists, imagine what kind of loon the president will nominate for O'Connor's seat. <a href="http://middleamericachronicle.blogspot.com/2005/09/dont-try-to-bork-roberts.html" rel="nofollow">Don t Bork Roberts</a> Opposing Roberts only hurts the Democrats. If they can be portrayed as obstructionists, imagine what kind of loon the president will nominate for O’Connor’s seat.

Don t Bork Roberts

]]> By: TrueBlueDem http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7247 TrueBlueDem Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:09:44 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7247 <i>A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.</i> Then they wouldn't be pro-life...know would they..... This is the same lie Kos and Armando are perpetueating. A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.

Then they wouldn’t be pro-life…know would they…..
This is the same lie Kos and Armando are perpetueating.

]]> By: Oliver http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7246 Oliver Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:09:18 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7246 A pro-choice Republican doesn't help choice. A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice. A pro-choice Republican doesn’t help choice. A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7245 Quaker in a Basement Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:09:44 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7245 <blockquote>and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future. </blockquote> OW, in the past, you've made this a party-solidarity issue. If NARAL is justified in cutting off a Dem who supports an anti-abortion judge, why aren't they equally justified to support a pro-choice Republican?

and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future.

OW, in the past, you’ve made this a party-solidarity issue. If NARAL is justified in cutting off a Dem who supports an anti-abortion judge, why aren’t they equally justified to support a pro-choice Republican?

]]> By: Oliver http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7244 Oliver Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:09:12 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7244 That its just as dumb for Leahy to be voting for him too, and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future. That its just as dumb for Leahy to be voting for him too, and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7243 Quaker in a Basement Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:09:47 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7243 Uh, Pat Leahy is voting for him too. Now what was your point again? Uh, Pat Leahy is voting for him too.

Now what was your point again?

]]> By: neoconsrloopy http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/21/narals-boy/#comment-7242 neoconsrloopy Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:09:08 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=588#comment-7242 Wow, sure is good we saved our filibuster rights, so we could use them when a Supreme Court nominee comes up, huh? Wow, sure is good we saved our filibuster rights, so we could use them when a Supreme Court nominee comes up, huh?

]]>