NARAL’s Boy

2:09 pm EST September 21st, 2005 | Politics | 8 Comments

Lincoln Chafee is voting for John Roberts. Explain to me again why the hell NARAL is supporting Republican candidates?

Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

8 Responses to “NARAL’s Boy”

  1. neoconsrloopy says:
    September 21, 2005 at 2:09 pm

    Wow, sure is good we saved our filibuster rights, so we could use them when a Supreme Court nominee comes up, huh?

  2. Quaker in a Basement says:
    September 21, 2005 at 2:09 pm

    Uh, Pat Leahy is voting for him too.

    Now what was your point again?

  3. Oliver says:
    September 21, 2005 at 3:09 pm

    That its just as dumb for Leahy to be voting for him too, and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future.

  4. Quaker in a Basement says:
    September 21, 2005 at 3:09 pm

    and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future.

    OW, in the past, you’ve made this a party-solidarity issue. If NARAL is justified in cutting off a Dem who supports an anti-abortion judge, why aren’t they equally justified to support a pro-choice Republican?

  5. Oliver says:
    September 21, 2005 at 4:09 pm

    A pro-choice Republican doesn’t help choice. A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.

  6. TrueBlueDem says:
    September 22, 2005 at 1:09 am

    A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.

    Then they wouldn’t be pro-life…know would they…..
    This is the same lie Kos and Armando are perpetueating.

  7. middleamericachron says:
    September 22, 2005 at 4:09 am

    Opposing Roberts only hurts the Democrats. If they can be portrayed as obstructionists, imagine what kind of loon the president will nominate for O’Connor’s seat.

    Don t Bork Roberts

  8. neoconsrloopy says:
    September 22, 2005 at 2:09 pm

    Free clue: The right could nominate a loon anyway. For that matter, Roberts could be a loon too- since he has no experience and won’t answer questions, we don’t know.

    Should we really send someone with only a year of experience to the highest judicial position in the US?

    The Bork comparison is interesting- he actually told us he was a loon. That taught the cons NEVER to tell people what they really think, because the public will summarily reject this.