Lincoln Chafee is voting for John Roberts. Explain to me again why the hell NARAL is supporting Republican candidates?
Yeah, I didn’t think so.
Lincoln Chafee is voting for John Roberts. Explain to me again why the hell NARAL is supporting Republican candidates?
Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Contact
Email: owillis@gmail.com
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
AIM: oliverwill
Huffington Post Columns
Media Matters Blog Entries
Wow, sure is good we saved our filibuster rights, so we could use them when a Supreme Court nominee comes up, huh?
Uh, Pat Leahy is voting for him too.
Now what was your point again?
That its just as dumb for Leahy to be voting for him too, and NARAL shouldnt help him out in the future.
OW, in the past, you’ve made this a party-solidarity issue. If NARAL is justified in cutting off a Dem who supports an anti-abortion judge, why aren’t they equally justified to support a pro-choice Republican?
A pro-choice Republican doesn’t help choice. A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.
A pro-life Democrat in a Democratic majority will help choice.
Then they wouldn’t be pro-life…know would they…..
This is the same lie Kos and Armando are perpetueating.
Opposing Roberts only hurts the Democrats. If they can be portrayed as obstructionists, imagine what kind of loon the president will nominate for O’Connor’s seat.
Don t Bork Roberts
Free clue: The right could nominate a loon anyway. For that matter, Roberts could be a loon too- since he has no experience and won’t answer questions, we don’t know.
Should we really send someone with only a year of experience to the highest judicial position in the US?
The Bork comparison is interesting- he actually told us he was a loon. That taught the cons NEVER to tell people what they really think, because the public will summarily reject this.