More Adventures In The Liberal Media
Tweet
The allegedly liberal L.A. Times urges Democrats to vote for John Roberts because we wouldn’t actually want to have spines on anything, seeing as how great that’s worked out so wonderful for our party and America.
>> The Case For a ‘No’ Vote on Roberts
>> Feminist Bloggers Say No to John Roberts
6 Responses to “More Adventures In The Liberal Media”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Fromthe article:
It will be a damning indictment of petty partisanship in Washington if an overwhelming majority of the Senate does not vote to confirm John G. Roberts Jr. to be the next chief justice of the United States.
We wouldn’t want to dispense with our petty partisanship, would we?
Is there anyone who can say (with a straight face) that corporate america is a bastion of liberal ideology. latimes and wapo are the latest print media to lose their reportage autonomy. Now that everyone is rejoicing about NYTIMES supporting Judith Miller they can also rejoice over the recent financial reverses and downsizing at same.
It is a victory for truth and justice everywhere, that the final arbiter on social issues will rest with the bean counters .
Frank;
We are ready to dispense with partisanship. Are you?
If the answer is yes I hope you don’t mean in ihe sense your Leader does.
‘Work with me’ generally means ‘do it my way’ to the Shrub.
Bi-Partisanship usually means ‘I need you help on this one’ to republicans.
When In the name of the Republic, when?
Well, the President DOES get to nominate Supreme Court Justices. Says so right there in the Constitution. And the amount of consideration shown Senate dems has been “unprecendeted”, so your characterization of “do it my way” is off the mark as well.
When In the name of the Republic, when?
When the Shrub gets Raptured, I guess