<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Brown: Fired?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6190</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, back on the thread, we await JD&#039;s response to the General Shinseki argument; does it support Jadegold&#039;s contention that Mr. Brown was politely shunted aside?  Or does it support the conservative notion that since the Bush administration does no wrong, Mr. Brown continues to be a vital part of the FEMA team?

The world awaits with breath barely bated.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, back on the thread, we await JD&#8217;s response to the General Shinseki argument; does it support Jadegold&#8217;s contention that Mr. Brown was politely shunted aside?  Or does it support the conservative notion that since the Bush administration does no wrong, Mr. Brown continues to be a vital part of the FEMA team?</p>
<p>The world awaits with breath barely bated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6189</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6189</guid>
		<description>A sideways polemic. Partially guilty as charged.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sideways polemic. Partially guilty as charged.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6188</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6188</guid>
		<description>Dugger;

The thread calls......John Edwards.......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger;</p>
<p>The thread calls&#8230;&#8230;John Edwards&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does this mean you reject the whole chickenhawk argument being made by the left?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not sure what this has to do with the topic at hand.  You wouldn&#039;t be trying to change the subject, would you?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does this mean you reject the whole chickenhawk argument being made by the left?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what this has to do with the topic at hand.  You wouldn&#8217;t be trying to change the subject, would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>Mouse,

&quot;The fact that you did serve in the USAF does not necessarily make his assessment less accurate.&quot;

Does this mean you reject the whole chickenhawk argument being made by the left?  I mean, I agree with you, but the left routinely uses the derogatory chickenhawk term to describe certain republican policy makers.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mouse,</p>
<p>&#8220;The fact that you did serve in the USAF does not necessarily make his assessment less accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does this mean you reject the whole chickenhawk argument being made by the left?  I mean, I agree with you, but the left routinely uses the derogatory chickenhawk term to describe certain republican policy makers.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6185</guid>
		<description>Alright JD, let&#039;s talk abou Shinseki:

According to a Guardian story:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This erupted over the Crusader mobile artillery system, which Mr Rumsfeld has scrapped. Gen Shinseki told Congress a year ago it would have saved lives during Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan. By then he had already been turned into a lame duck (&quot;castrated&quot;, according to the same Pentagon source) by the apparently &lt;b&gt;unprecedented Rumsfeld decision to announce his successor 18 months in advance&lt;/b&gt;.

I&#039;ll post the link in a subsequent comment, in case it becomes stuck in &quot;awaiting moderation&quot; limbo.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright JD, let&#8217;s talk abou Shinseki:</p>
<p>According to a Guardian story:</p>
<blockquote><p>This erupted over the Crusader mobile artillery system, which Mr Rumsfeld has scrapped. Gen Shinseki told Congress a year ago it would have saved lives during Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan. By then he had already been turned into a lame duck (&#8221;castrated&#8221;, according to the same Pentagon source) by the apparently <b>unprecedented Rumsfeld decision to announce his successor 18 months in advance</b>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post the link in a subsequent comment, in case it becomes stuck in &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221; limbo.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6184</guid>
		<description>Here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,925140,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian story&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,925140,00.html" rel="nofollow">Guardian story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6183</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6183</guid>
		<description>Mouse : Let us continue with the General Shinseki example.  Were your description to be applied to that situation, then I would agree with you.  However, it happened in the exact opposite way, ie.  General Shinseki announced his retirement, and then the substantive issues were delegated to the people that would actually be still working there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mouse : Let us continue with the General Shinseki example.  Were your description to be applied to that situation, then I would agree with you.  However, it happened in the exact opposite way, ie.  General Shinseki announced his retirement, and then the substantive issues were delegated to the people that would actually be still working there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>JD: Time after time, rightie commenters such as yourself deplore the tone of progressive commenters on this site.  You usually end your self-righteous indignation with word along the lines of &quot;...but that&#039;s what I would expect of the left&quot; or &quot;...typical of the far-left&quot;.  However, I appreciate your mea culpa, as backhanded as your subsequent statements make it seem.

As to your own assumption that I didn&#039;t read what you had responded nor your response to it, you are simply wrong.

Jadegold offered his/her opinion that you did not seem to understand the military and how some civilian employers work.  The fact that you did serve in the USAF does not necessarily make his assessment less accurate.  In my experience of the corporate world, removing meaningful responsibility from executives is usually a first not-so-subtle nudge out the door.

Of course, this does not mean that all such actions mean the same thing, particularly in the Bush administration where incompetence is usually rewarded.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD: Time after time, rightie commenters such as yourself deplore the tone of progressive commenters on this site.  You usually end your self-righteous indignation with word along the lines of &#8220;&#8230;but that&#8217;s what I would expect of the left&#8221; or &#8220;&#8230;typical of the far-left&#8221;.  However, I appreciate your mea culpa, as backhanded as your subsequent statements make it seem.</p>
<p>As to your own assumption that I didn&#8217;t read what you had responded nor your response to it, you are simply wrong.</p>
<p>Jadegold offered his/her opinion that you did not seem to understand the military and how some civilian employers work.  The fact that you did serve in the USAF does not necessarily make his assessment less accurate.  In my experience of the corporate world, removing meaningful responsibility from executives is usually a first not-so-subtle nudge out the door.</p>
<p>Of course, this does not mean that all such actions mean the same thing, particularly in the Bush administration where incompetence is usually rewarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6181</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 05:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6181</guid>
		<description>Mouse : had you bothered to read what I responded to, you would have noted that jadegold made large and completely inaccurate assumptions about me, in order to attempt to make his point.  Sorry, should not have used the words I did.

Additionally, I suppose you just quit reading, because despite my poor choice of language to address jadegold, I did address his comments in a substantive manner after that.

Sheer gall?  You say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mouse : had you bothered to read what I responded to, you would have noted that jadegold made large and completely inaccurate assumptions about me, in order to attempt to make his point.  Sorry, should not have used the words I did.</p>
<p>Additionally, I suppose you just quit reading, because despite my poor choice of language to address jadegold, I did address his comments in a substantive manner after that.</p>
<p>Sheer gall?  You say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6180</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Go fuck yourself.
Listen, you little shit. Let s just use one of your bullshit examples. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I suppose civil discussion goes out the window when you have no valid argument to make?

Considering that Jadegold did not descend to calling names and using abusive language, it&#039;s the height of hypocrisy and sheer gall to demand an apology.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Go fuck yourself.<br />
Listen, you little shit. Let s just use one of your bullshit examples. </p></blockquote>
<p>I suppose civil discussion goes out the window when you have no valid argument to make?</p>
<p>Considering that Jadegold did not descend to calling names and using abusive language, it&#8217;s the height of hypocrisy and sheer gall to demand an apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6179</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6179</guid>
		<description>Now that your erroneous assumption that I have never served my country has been debunked, I shall await your apology.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that your erroneous assumption that I have never served my country has been debunked, I shall await your apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6178</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6178</guid>
		<description>Listen, you little shit. Let&#039;s just use one of your bullshit examples.  General Shinseki.  He announced his own retirement after a long and distinguished career.  Subsequently, since he was retiring, new and ongoing responsibilities went to people that might actually be around to see the project through.  I call it retirement.  You call it firing.

Your condescending attitude really wears on me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, you little shit. Let&#8217;s just use one of your bullshit examples.  General Shinseki.  He announced his own retirement after a long and distinguished career.  Subsequently, since he was retiring, new and ongoing responsibilities went to people that might actually be around to see the project through.  I call it retirement.  You call it firing.</p>
<p>Your condescending attitude really wears on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6177</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is a fundamental difference between resigning and being fired. &lt;/i&gt;

Again you&#039;re betraying your lack of understanding of the military and even most civilian jobs.

Let&#039;s take a real life example; take the skipper of the USS GREENVILLE.  He was relieved of command after the incident with the Japanese training vessel.  Was he fired?

Not in the semantical sense you seem to demand; after all, he continued to draw a paycheck, he was transferred to some non-job job and his career in the Navy was effectively over.  Yet, he stayed in the Navy for nearly two more years.

IOW, the way &quot;firing&quot; works in the military is that you&#039;re stripped of command, responsibilities and any hope of advancement is gone.

But even in the civilian world, many jobs won&#039;t actually kick you out the door. Instead, they create an atmosphere where you&#039;ll leave on your own. It&#039;s kind of telling you&#039;d stay in a job because you got a paycheck even though all your duties are gone and there&#039;s no hope of advancement.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is a fundamental difference between resigning and being fired. </i></p>
<p>Again you&#8217;re betraying your lack of understanding of the military and even most civilian jobs.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a real life example; take the skipper of the USS GREENVILLE.  He was relieved of command after the incident with the Japanese training vessel.  Was he fired?</p>
<p>Not in the semantical sense you seem to demand; after all, he continued to draw a paycheck, he was transferred to some non-job job and his career in the Navy was effectively over.  Yet, he stayed in the Navy for nearly two more years.</p>
<p>IOW, the way &#8220;firing&#8221; works in the military is that you&#8217;re stripped of command, responsibilities and any hope of advancement is gone.</p>
<p>But even in the civilian world, many jobs won&#8217;t actually kick you out the door. Instead, they create an atmosphere where you&#8217;ll leave on your own. It&#8217;s kind of telling you&#8217;d stay in a job because you got a paycheck even though all your duties are gone and there&#8217;s no hope of advancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6176</guid>
		<description>Semantics, my ass.  There is a fundamental difference between resigning and being fired.

Go fuck yourself.  I served in the USAF as an Arabic cryptological linguist for several years.

No, I have not been fired.  Might not be the greatest working environment, but I am still drawing a paycheck.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semantics, my ass.  There is a fundamental difference between resigning and being fired.</p>
<p>Go fuck yourself.  I served in the USAF as an Arabic cryptological linguist for several years.</p>
<p>No, I have not been fired.  Might not be the greatest working environment, but I am still drawing a paycheck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6175</guid>
		<description>JD:  You wish to argue semantics because you understand you can&#039;t argue the issues.

Was GEN Shinseki fired?  Not in the terms that someone gave him a pink slip.  But certainly--within DoD--that&#039;s what happened.  It&#039;s difficult to explain to folks who have never served and think the military is like working at WalMart.

WRT Powell, something similar happened.  Basically, his power was subsumed by DoD and he became a lame duck.  You can make an argument and say that&#039;s not being &#039;fired&#039;--but you understand it&#039;s the same thing.

I don&#039;t know if you have a job or not, JD--but let&#039;s assume you do.  Suppose one day, you tick the boss off.  But the boss doesn&#039;t tell you to pack your desk and get out.  Instead, he takes away all your duties and responsibilities.  You&#039;re basically ignored but you&#039;re still drawing a paycheck.  You have no hope of promotion or further advancement or even a lateral transefer.  Are you seriously arguing you haven&#039;t been effectively fired?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD:  You wish to argue semantics because you understand you can&#8217;t argue the issues.</p>
<p>Was GEN Shinseki fired?  Not in the terms that someone gave him a pink slip.  But certainly&#8211;within DoD&#8211;that&#8217;s what happened.  It&#8217;s difficult to explain to folks who have never served and think the military is like working at WalMart.</p>
<p>WRT Powell, something similar happened.  Basically, his power was subsumed by DoD and he became a lame duck.  You can make an argument and say that&#8217;s not being &#8216;fired&#8217;&#8211;but you understand it&#8217;s the same thing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you have a job or not, JD&#8211;but let&#8217;s assume you do.  Suppose one day, you tick the boss off.  But the boss doesn&#8217;t tell you to pack your desk and get out.  Instead, he takes away all your duties and responsibilities.  You&#8217;re basically ignored but you&#8217;re still drawing a paycheck.  You have no hope of promotion or further advancement or even a lateral transefer.  Are you seriously arguing you haven&#8217;t been effectively fired?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6174</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6174</guid>
		<description>Dugger : Have you noticed that when it comes to the Democrats, Nagin and Blanco, they are willing to sit back and wait on the facts to come in, but they just sit back and indiscriminantly call for every Republican&#039;s scalp?

jadegold : Keep saying it, and you might start to believe it.  The simple fact is that the federal government was not in charge of the entire emergency before it even happened.  I know that makes your partisan sniping more difficult, so you choose to ignore that inconvenient fact, but it does not change things.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger : Have you noticed that when it comes to the Democrats, Nagin and Blanco, they are willing to sit back and wait on the facts to come in, but they just sit back and indiscriminantly call for every Republican&#8217;s scalp?</p>
<p>jadegold : Keep saying it, and you might start to believe it.  The simple fact is that the federal government was not in charge of the entire emergency before it even happened.  I know that makes your partisan sniping more difficult, so you choose to ignore that inconvenient fact, but it does not change things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6173</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6173</guid>
		<description>jadegold just cannot keep from flat out lying.  Sec. Powell was not fired.  Gen. Shinseki was not fired, etc ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jadegold just cannot keep from flat out lying.  Sec. Powell was not fired.  Gen. Shinseki was not fired, etc &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6172</guid>
		<description>Dugger&#039;s MO: When pure denial doesn&#039;t work, attempt to share the blame.

Again, even if Nagin and Blanco had performed flawlessly (and, in fact, their performance was much better than Giuliani&#039;s before and after 9/11)--the state and local resources would have been--and were--swiftly overwhelmed by the magnitude of the disaster.

Of course, what is inescapable is the fact the Fed Govt had taken control and responsibility of the emergency &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; a single teaspoon of water came over the floodwall.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger&#8217;s MO: When pure denial doesn&#8217;t work, attempt to share the blame.</p>
<p>Again, even if Nagin and Blanco had performed flawlessly (and, in fact, their performance was much better than Giuliani&#8217;s before and after 9/11)&#8211;the state and local resources would have been&#8211;and were&#8211;swiftly overwhelmed by the magnitude of the disaster.</p>
<p>Of course, what is inescapable is the fact the Fed Govt had taken control and responsibility of the emergency <i>before</i> a single teaspoon of water came over the floodwall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dugger1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/09/09/mike-brown-fired/#comment-6171</link>
		<dc:creator>dugger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=521#comment-6171</guid>
		<description>Quaker,  Read earlier. We collectively call on them to RESIGN. Nagins and Blanco cost lives.  They must resign.  Don&#039;t be hypocrites progressives.  Lets do the right thing.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,  Read earlier. We collectively call on them to RESIGN. Nagins and Blanco cost lives.  They must resign.  Don&#8217;t be hypocrites progressives.  Lets do the right thing.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
