It all depends on when you were interviewed. If it was the darkside Diane Sawyer who worked for the evil Lord Milhouse who interviewed you, then you are obviously simply a press hating Republican. If it was the older, CBS blonde-bombshell-news-babe Diane Sawyer, rumored in some circles to be Dan’s “Kenneth”, then you are obviously a running dog lackey of the liberal hegemonistic mainstream media.

Dugger, ‘Though “bother it” I may occasionally say, I never use a big, big D’

In one swift, incisive blow, Quaker establishes that Schieffer cannot be liberal.

Dugger, Who Once Ate at a Table next to Dianne Sawyer and Ed Bradley and Therefore, Something or the Other – i bet nobody reads this far down anyway

Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. President. If we could be one-one-hundredth as great as you and Hillary Rodham Clinton have been together in the White House, we’d take it right now and walk away winners.–Dan Rather to Bill Clinton, who offered his congratualtions on Connie Chung’s co-anchor appointment at a meeting for CBS affiliates, May 27, 1993.

Not even worth more comment than that.

It seems as if Conservatives rarely mean what they say.

Yeah, Jade. I know. Fake but accurate. (Hmm. I’ve heard that before…)

Frankly, no self-respecting news organization should give a tinker’s dam about what the WH thinks.

Let’s see. Les Moonves is quoted,  That s not the end-all, be-all, but obviously the White House doesn t hate CBS anymore with Schieffer in the chair.

Yep. CBS MUST have gotten approval from the White House before they picked Schieffer. Sounds like a pretty strong endorsement of CBS by W himself. HA!

You call that a concrete example, BinkyBoy?

“Well, I don’t hate the Red Sox anymore now that they won the World Series, but I still think they suck.”

*ding*

“I don’t hate CBS anymore now that Bob Schiefer is at the desk. But that’s only because Dan Rather is GONE! They still suck though.”

*ding*

White House plaudits. Right. LOL.

And QITB- Are you saying that brothers (or even business partners for that matter) automatically have the same political views? Are you saying that I can’t be friends or associate with liberals?

Maybe you’re not a golfer or a baseball fan. If your brother was business partners with, let’s say, Mitt Romney, and owned the Mets, and he invited you to go to a game or to play golf with he and Mitt, D’ya think you would pass because of politics?

(Gosh- I better not call my mother tonight like I was planning. She’s a total liberal and I’m not. Oh no- what do I do?)

The same Bob Schieffer whose brother was GWB’s partner in owning the Texas Rangers baseball club? The same Bob Schieffer who used to attend ballgames and play golf with W?

Damn that liberal bias.

I notice you put “forged” in quotes. Why? Is there still any question that the doc was forged? I thought we already dealt with that.

Additionally, we know Killian’s secretary and several colleagues believe the docs are bogus–but say the content is accurate.

You miss what really was Ratherand CBS’s sin–that they could not firmly establish the provenance of the docs. Not that the story itself was false. IOW, you can’t frame a guilty man.

I suppose you’ll drag out the “forged” memo now, and you’ll also point us to the link where the person that reports on how the person the forged the memo was arrested and is awaiting trial?

That and there just wasn’t enough of a post for him to come up with a really pithy judgemental response other than “lamest”