<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1,380</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mostly Muppet Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Muppet Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-540</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Osama Clock&lt;/strong&gt;

Spurred on by Oliver Willis  post on Friday, concerning the number of days that have passed since 9/11, I thought I d write a nifty little clock script.  You can visit the  Osama Clock  and see just how much time has passed sin...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Osama Clock</strong></p>
<p>Spurred on by Oliver Willis  post on Friday, concerning the number of days that have passed since 9/11, I thought I d write a nifty little clock script.  You can visit the  Osama Clock  and see just how much time has passed sin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-539</guid>
		<description>actually, evergreen, you're the one posting at midnight.. I have two sons that keep me home. What's your excuse?
You want to read my blog?
Which one?
&lt;a href="http://www.condipundit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;CondiPundit&lt;/a&gt; (which isn't actually "mine" -- I co - write it with Mick Wright) OR

&lt;a href="http://militaryhistory.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;He That Shall Live This Day&lt;/a&gt; OR

&lt;a href="http://mftfamily.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Family Ties That Bind&lt;/a&gt;

Be warned: They're not anti - Bush, or anti - Republican. There's no T &#038; A, no Washington Redskins, and no DC Comics -- in other words, nothing that would interest any of Oliver's fans.

Don't bother to comment -- you might say something intelligent, and I'm not sure my heart could stand it..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, evergreen, you&#8217;re the one posting at midnight.. I have two sons that keep me home. What&#8217;s your excuse?<br />
You want to read my blog?<br />
Which one?<br />
<a href="http://www.condipundit.com" rel="nofollow">CondiPundit</a> (which isn&#8217;t actually &#8220;mine&#8221; &#8212; I co - write it with Mick Wright) OR</p>
<p><a href="http://militaryhistory.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">He That Shall Live This Day</a> OR</p>
<p><a href="http://mftfamily.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Family Ties That Bind</a></p>
<p>Be warned: They&#8217;re not anti - Bush, or anti - Republican. There&#8217;s no T &#038; A, no Washington Redskins, and no DC Comics &#8212; in other words, nothing that would interest any of Oliver&#8217;s fans.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother to comment &#8212; you might say something intelligent, and I&#8217;m not sure my heart could stand it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aterranova95</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>aterranova95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-538</guid>
		<description>You are new  to politics if Dean has the support of 1/2 of america. I'm not sure if he would carry Vermont in an election. He's chairman as a distraction, as long as he talks no one noticies anyone else. If you want to post numbers, try posting the amount of civilians that died in Japan, because of the two big bombs we dropped. Imagine if Bush tried that. Everyone wants to make reference to WW II and Vietnam, when it's convenient for them. If you use the numbers, use them all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are new  to politics if Dean has the support of 1/2 of america. I&#8217;m not sure if he would carry Vermont in an election. He&#8217;s chairman as a distraction, as long as he talks no one noticies anyone else. If you want to post numbers, try posting the amount of civilians that died in Japan, because of the two big bombs we dropped. Imagine if Bush tried that. Everyone wants to make reference to WW II and Vietnam, when it&#8217;s convenient for them. If you use the numbers, use them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evergreen</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>evergreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank...someone said you had a blog....which one is it...? someone said that the turnout was a little low. no worry...just tell me which one it is and ill come over and fire up the troops. that'll give you twice the opportunity to blow steam at me.  I know its friday night and you're probably feeling like ....i dont know...driving to Montreal and choking a socialist or something....and you know what?...i say do it! if it'll get it out of your system, do it. ill vouch that you were here the whole time bitchin me out with crazy ramblings. We're in this together, you and me. And much as i can't stand you...there is no way, NO WAY , i'd rat on you for choking a Socialist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank&#8230;someone said you had a blog&#8230;.which one is it&#8230;? someone said that the turnout was a little low. no worry&#8230;just tell me which one it is and ill come over and fire up the troops. that&#8217;ll give you twice the opportunity to blow steam at me.  I know its friday night and you&#8217;re probably feeling like &#8230;.i dont know&#8230;driving to Montreal and choking a socialist or something&#8230;.and you know what?&#8230;i say do it! if it&#8217;ll get it out of your system, do it. ill vouch that you were here the whole time bitchin me out with crazy ramblings. We&#8217;re in this together, you and me. And much as i can&#8217;t stand you&#8230;there is no way, NO WAY , i&#8217;d rat on you for choking a Socialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 03:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Evergreen was just being a wiseass. Was I supposed to be diplomatic? Why?

Yes, M'sieu Loopy, calling me "Frankie boy" isn't an &lt;i&gt;ad hominem&lt;/i&gt; attack; it's a reasoned argument.

By the way, did you challenge me, or are you just playing "Wyatt Earp" on this thread?

&lt;i&gt;Heh.&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evergreen was just being a wiseass. Was I supposed to be diplomatic? Why?</p>
<p>Yes, M&#8217;sieu Loopy, calling me &#8220;Frankie boy&#8221; isn&#8217;t an <i>ad hominem</i> attack; it&#8217;s a reasoned argument.</p>
<p>By the way, did you challenge me, or are you just playing &#8220;Wyatt Earp&#8221; on this thread?</p>
<p><i>Heh.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-535</guid>
		<description>This post is more proof that Democrats would &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; politicize 9/11 or the War on Terror, unlike those dirty Republicans.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is more proof that Democrats would <i>never</i> politicize 9/11 or the War on Terror, unlike those dirty Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-534</guid>
		<description>If you think that the people rooting Dean on represent one - half of the population, you don't anything about US politics. Try to square that statement with the fact that he couldn't get nominated by a 100% Democratic convention.
As to pretending "to have a direct line to Jesus," you're just exposing your own anti - religious bias. Bush did no such thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think that the people rooting Dean on represent one - half of the population, you don&#8217;t anything about US politics. Try to square that statement with the fact that he couldn&#8217;t get nominated by a 100% Democratic convention.<br />
As to pretending &#8220;to have a direct line to Jesus,&#8221; you&#8217;re just exposing your own anti - religious bias. Bush did no such thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evergreen</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>evergreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Frank... I'm not talking about yesteryear...im talking about today. I don't care about carter, clinton, or last year's election. I'm talking about today. and today, Dean has the full support of the left....which is = to around  1/2 of america. Which by your logic means that 1/2 of today's america hates america.  Get it? And as far as what clinton did to get elected ...whether he acted liberal or conservative...I don't know ... but i know he didn't pretend to have a direct line to Jesus just to swing a few votes. Now that's blasphemy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank&#8230; I&#8217;m not talking about yesteryear&#8230;im talking about today. I don&#8217;t care about carter, clinton, or last year&#8217;s election. I&#8217;m talking about today. and today, Dean has the full support of the left&#8230;.which is = to around  1/2 of america. Which by your logic means that 1/2 of today&#8217;s america hates america.  Get it? And as far as what clinton did to get elected &#8230;whether he acted liberal or conservative&#8230;I don&#8217;t know &#8230; but i know he didn&#8217;t pretend to have a direct line to Jesus just to swing a few votes. Now that&#8217;s blasphemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoconsrloopy</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>neoconsrloopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-532</guid>
		<description>That's right Frankie boy, whenever someone challenges you, call them names, call them stupid, all the usual ad hominum attacks.

You impress all of us with your ranting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Frankie boy, whenever someone challenges you, call them names, call them stupid, all the usual ad hominum attacks.</p>
<p>You impress all of us with your ranting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-531</guid>
		<description>evergreen: How "Durbinesque" of you! Pick out a couple of words, hang your hat on it, and ignore the rest.
It was your ida that 1/2 of America supported the likes of Dean, et al, but ask yourself, who got nominated? The guy who opposed the war and bragged about it, or the guy who said he had a better way to win it?
And ask yourself this: Did Clinton win two elections by pretending to be liberal, or pretending to br conservative?
Even Carter turned out to be more liberal in office than he was during the campaign, and Ford was no competition in 1976

I find it interesting that so many people know how inactive my blog is, without going there. If you do go there, why do you go? Just to see how many people are going there? You're not commenting. Why not?
Can't understand all the big words? They're only newspaper stories. I know that's above Oliver's "See Bush lie" style of writing and linking, but you should be able to handle it. Call your "lifeline".
And you think &lt;i&gt;I'm&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; bored!
If you're not going to comment, don't visit...
Who needs a bunch of "Willis Wannabes" over there with nothing to say? Not me...&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evergreen: How &#8220;Durbinesque&#8221; of you! Pick out a couple of words, hang your hat on it, and ignore the rest.<br />
It was your ida that 1/2 of America supported the likes of Dean, et al, but ask yourself, who got nominated? The guy who opposed the war and bragged about it, or the guy who said he had a better way to win it?<br />
And ask yourself this: Did Clinton win two elections by pretending to be liberal, or pretending to br conservative?<br />
Even Carter turned out to be more liberal in office than he was during the campaign, and Ford was no competition in 1976</p>
<p>I find it interesting that so many people know how inactive my blog is, without going there. If you do go there, why do you go? Just to see how many people are going there? You&#8217;re not commenting. Why not?<br />
Can&#8217;t understand all the big words? They&#8217;re only newspaper stories. I know that&#8217;s above Oliver&#8217;s &#8220;See Bush lie&#8221; style of writing and linking, but you should be able to handle it. Call your &#8220;lifeline&#8221;.<br />
And you think <i>I&#8217;m</i><i> bored!<br />
If you&#8217;re not going to comment, don&#8217;t visit&#8230;<br />
Who needs a bunch of &#8220;Willis Wannabes&#8221; over there with nothing to say? Not me&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Yes, but FDR and Truman got the job done, instead of diverting energy and resources into unrelated wars. If only conservatives would apply *that* standard today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but FDR and Truman got the job done, instead of diverting energy and resources into unrelated wars. If only conservatives would apply *that* standard today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, if one were to judge Roosevelt and Truman by the same standards that today's "progressives" use to judge George W. Bush, they would come out looking a lot less like heroes.

Consider:

Roosevelt did not oppose the US and British fire bombing of Tokyo and Dresden, therefore he is a war criminal who is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians

Roosevelt did not personally correct the intelligence failures that occurred after the Normandy landing and which allowed Germany to mount an major offensive during The Battle of the Bulge, therefore he is an incompetent bungler personally responsible for the needless deaths of thousands of Allied soldiers

Roosevelt did nothing during the 1930's to prepare us for war; our military was so pitifully equipped that it took two years before we put anything into the air that could match the Japanese war planes, and we lost thousands of men on the ground in Europe because our light tanks were blown to bits by the German heavy tanks and artillery, therefore he is an incompetent bungler personally responsible for the needless deaths of thousands of Allied soldiers

Truman gave the order to nuke Japan, therefore he is a war criminal who is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians

Truman did not oppose the execution - by hanging, certainly an inhumane and cruel punishment - of Nazi and Japanese leaders.  In doing so, he gave his tacit approval to cruel, violent vigilante justice of a sort that would never be acceptable today

Neither Roosevelt or Truman ever admitted to the serious policy mistakes made by England, France, or the US during the 1920's and 1039's, and neither offered an apology to the German people for the way they were treated by the French and British after WWI, which was probably the single-most important root cause of WWII

Sixty years later we STILL have troops in Europe!  And we still have troops in Japan!  Obviously Truman had no exit strategy and therefore was a colossal failure at foreign policy; otherwise all our troops should have been home by Christmas 1948

See my point?

If George W. Bush did the same exact things that these two "heroes" did during WWII, would you consider him to be a hero too?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, if one were to judge Roosevelt and Truman by the same standards that today&#8217;s &#8220;progressives&#8221; use to judge George W. Bush, they would come out looking a lot less like heroes.</p>
<p>Consider:</p>
<p>Roosevelt did not oppose the US and British fire bombing of Tokyo and Dresden, therefore he is a war criminal who is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians</p>
<p>Roosevelt did not personally correct the intelligence failures that occurred after the Normandy landing and which allowed Germany to mount an major offensive during The Battle of the Bulge, therefore he is an incompetent bungler personally responsible for the needless deaths of thousands of Allied soldiers</p>
<p>Roosevelt did nothing during the 1930&#8217;s to prepare us for war; our military was so pitifully equipped that it took two years before we put anything into the air that could match the Japanese war planes, and we lost thousands of men on the ground in Europe because our light tanks were blown to bits by the German heavy tanks and artillery, therefore he is an incompetent bungler personally responsible for the needless deaths of thousands of Allied soldiers</p>
<p>Truman gave the order to nuke Japan, therefore he is a war criminal who is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians</p>
<p>Truman did not oppose the execution - by hanging, certainly an inhumane and cruel punishment - of Nazi and Japanese leaders.  In doing so, he gave his tacit approval to cruel, violent vigilante justice of a sort that would never be acceptable today</p>
<p>Neither Roosevelt or Truman ever admitted to the serious policy mistakes made by England, France, or the US during the 1920&#8217;s and 1039&#8217;s, and neither offered an apology to the German people for the way they were treated by the French and British after WWI, which was probably the single-most important root cause of WWII</p>
<p>Sixty years later we STILL have troops in Europe!  And we still have troops in Japan!  Obviously Truman had no exit strategy and therefore was a colossal failure at foreign policy; otherwise all our troops should have been home by Christmas 1948</p>
<p>See my point?</p>
<p>If George W. Bush did the same exact things that these two &#8220;heroes&#8221; did during WWII, would you consider him to be a hero too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.Y.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>O.Y.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-528</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;evergreen: shove it!&lt;/i&gt;

This says pretty much all you need to know about Frank D.

I suggest all us ignore his posts from now on.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>evergreen: shove it!</i></p>
<p>This says pretty much all you need to know about Frank D.</p>
<p>I suggest all us ignore his posts from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-527</guid>
		<description>"The left handed their testes in during the Viet Nam war"  And the right handed in their brains and their integrity during the Iraq war. Seriously, have fun fighting those strawmen, Frank. I don't know any Democrat who has a " Why can t we all get along?  approach to fighting al-Qaeda.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The left handed their testes in during the Viet Nam war&#8221;  And the right handed in their brains and their integrity during the Iraq war. Seriously, have fun fighting those strawmen, Frank. I don&#8217;t know any Democrat who has a &#8220; Why can t we all get along?  approach to fighting al-Qaeda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evergreen</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>evergreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Frank ... i'd like to 'shove it'. but since im unemployed i consider everything 'shovable'...'pawnable'.... and i might need the cash.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8230; i&#8217;d like to &#8217;shove it&#8217;. but since im unemployed i consider everything &#8217;shovable&#8217;&#8230;&#8217;pawnable&#8217;&#8230;. and i might need the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-525</guid>
		<description>You know, the sad thing is that there are lots of conservatives out there on the lunatic fringe, much more than there were before Rush and the modern movement. People who thought held demented beliefs such as FDR selling out Eastern Europe were rightly marginalized -- it's sure not the part of Eisenhower any more. It's not even the party of GHW Bush.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the sad thing is that there are lots of conservatives out there on the lunatic fringe, much more than there were before Rush and the modern movement. People who thought held demented beliefs such as FDR selling out Eastern Europe were rightly marginalized &#8212; it&#8217;s sure not the part of Eisenhower any more. It&#8217;s not even the party of GHW Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zappa</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Zappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I am with O.Y.E.
Frank only shows up because no one posts on his blog and he gets bored.

At least Dugger has a sense of humor!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with O.Y.E.<br />
Frank only shows up because no one posts on his blog and he gets bored.</p>
<p>At least Dugger has a sense of humor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-523</guid>
		<description>That's *party* of Eishenhower, even.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s *party* of Eishenhower, even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevorwells</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>trevorwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-522</guid>
		<description>22,507 The minimum number of civilian deaths reported in Iraq.
25,499 The maximum number of civilian deaths reported in Iraq.

&lt;a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.iraqbodycount.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

The gipper's namesake eloquently stated of this administration,  Politicians will stretch the truth. They'll exaggerate their accomplishments, paper over their gaffes. Spin has long been the lingua franca of the political realm. But George W. Bush and his administration have taken "normal" mendacity to a startling new level far beyond lies of convenience. On top of the usual massaging of public perception, they traffic in big lies, indulge in any number of symptomatic small lies, and, ultimately, have come to embody dishonesty itself. They are a lie."

This administration's fraudulent rationales for this unjustified war culminate in broken bodies, broken spirits, and broken lives. The DLC crowd would have us to believe they could prosecute this imperialistic and hegemonic quest for petroleum supremacy better. It is a shallow and craven boast that needs to be vociferously denounced. As Democrats, we should stand for justice, which ultimately means we need to stand up for a complete withdrawal from Iraq, Globalization, the WTO, NAFTA, GATT and the whole racist framework of the new world order.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22,507 The minimum number of civilian deaths reported in Iraq.<br />
25,499 The maximum number of civilian deaths reported in Iraq.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.net" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.iraqbodycount.net</a></p>
<p>The gipper&#8217;s namesake eloquently stated of this administration,  Politicians will stretch the truth. They&#8217;ll exaggerate their accomplishments, paper over their gaffes. Spin has long been the lingua franca of the political realm. But George W. Bush and his administration have taken &#8220;normal&#8221; mendacity to a startling new level far beyond lies of convenience. On top of the usual massaging of public perception, they traffic in big lies, indulge in any number of symptomatic small lies, and, ultimately, have come to embody dishonesty itself. They are a lie.&#8221;</p>
<p>This administration&#8217;s fraudulent rationales for this unjustified war culminate in broken bodies, broken spirits, and broken lives. The DLC crowd would have us to believe they could prosecute this imperialistic and hegemonic quest for petroleum supremacy better. It is a shallow and craven boast that needs to be vociferously denounced. As Democrats, we should stand for justice, which ultimately means we need to stand up for a complete withdrawal from Iraq, Globalization, the WTO, NAFTA, GATT and the whole racist framework of the new world order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pionar</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2005/06/24/1380/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>pionar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=90#comment-521</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Days elapsed since Pearl Harbor and the capture of Tojo and Hitler: (23,210) days and countring.

That liberals see the GWOT as simply a manhunt for one guy (Osama) shows just how right Karl Rove was. &lt;/i&gt;

You're stupid.  Please tell me you're either 8 years old or mentally retarded, so I can feel some sympathy for you.  Otherwise, you're just plain stupid.  Tojo was defeated on V-J day.  Hitler died in the final days of WWII.

The AWOT (it's Asian, not global, no matter how much cons like to delude themselves) is not a manhunt for one dude.  But I remember this president saying, "The people who knocked down these buildings will hear from all of us soon!"  I actually had a tear in my eye when I heard that.  It was a rallying cry all of us could get pumped about.  What happened?  Well, we chased the people who knocked down those buildings around the desert for a year, installed a puppet government, declared that war done and went after someone who had nothing to do with knocking those buildings down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Days elapsed since Pearl Harbor and the capture of Tojo and Hitler: (23,210) days and countring.</p>
<p>That liberals see the GWOT as simply a manhunt for one guy (Osama) shows just how right Karl Rove was. </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re stupid.  Please tell me you&#8217;re either 8 years old or mentally retarded, so I can feel some sympathy for you.  Otherwise, you&#8217;re just plain stupid.  Tojo was defeated on V-J day.  Hitler died in the final days of WWII.</p>
<p>The AWOT (it&#8217;s Asian, not global, no matter how much cons like to delude themselves) is not a manhunt for one dude.  But I remember this president saying, &#8220;The people who knocked down these buildings will hear from all of us soon!&#8221;  I actually had a tear in my eye when I heard that.  It was a rallying cry all of us could get pumped about.  What happened?  Well, we chased the people who knocked down those buildings around the desert for a year, installed a puppet government, declared that war done and went after someone who had nothing to do with knocking those buildings down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
